Vehicle comparison
For $100,000, what car would you choose? In the current wave of suvs, would you choose a small joint venture suv? Or an autonomous suv? Actually, we have a third option -- a camery-class car, an autonomous class b car. They all have a “face” that meets the standards of national aesthetic standards, as well as a "b" class car, which, with just over 80,000, can be bought in a relatively less expensive hand-cargo. Now it's time to see who's worth it
With regard to the size of the car, which is 820 axes longer and the length of which is also the crown of the three cars, and which is more in tune with the current appearance, he considers that the three cars are the most durable and more atmospheric. In terms of overall car safety, tsang z500 became the bright spot, and five years or 150,000 kilometres of ultra-long quality security made consumers more comfortable when buying it。
For engines, motors 820 and biadi g6, respectively, use home-grown engines, and power parameters are similar. The use of the mitsubishi engine by tsar z500 would lead to better natural power performance, which is supported by data. After all, it's an autonomous brand, and tomatoco recommends that you buy a more sophisticated manual block。
On the hanging structure, the 820 and the biadi g6 are at least stand-alone suspensions, while the use of the back-twisted non-independent slabs as a class b vehicle by the z500s is a little overstretched, with the cosmopolitan 820 and biadi g6 winnings. But the z500 is not nothing, and the use of more advanced electric power and electronic hand brakes is a little bit thicker than the competition。
There is only two airbags in the main/co-pilot slot of 820, and there is a lack of good faith in passive safety, while the z500s are lazy in their active security configuration and are not equipped with a body stabilization system. By contrast, biadi g6 seems more sincere. In other configurations as well, biadig6 is richer, and there is no doubt that biadig6 won in this configuration。
