JiangsuI've been walking around a lot
If you look at the results, many people will think that jiangsu is just..EducationYou're lucky, you're rich, so you're always trying out new ways
But when you put 20 years of change together, the taste changed. Jiangsu didn't stand next to it, but put himself in it. Lee
In this case, it's not the number of changes, it's every change, it's the average candidate
Jiangsu students often feel that it's not "policy coming," it's "date coming back."
In 2000, jiangsu enteredReform of the baccalaureatePilot, starting with “3+x”, when the idea was not complicated, to move the examination from a single score to a sorted selection, giving students some space
Immediately thereafter, jiangsu moved towards a "3+small", followed by a "3+small" and then to "3+1+1", the path has been changing
Behind the change, it's not random, it's reality that pushes every set of options aside. Let's go
A way to do it, not to read the papers, but to see if the school can schedule, if the students can learn, if parents can accept, if they can acceptEquity
The “3+ big consolidated” of 2002 is a part of jiangsu's reform history that cannot be avoided
Six classes are placed in a volume, in addition to languages, mathematics, foreign languages, and combined physical, chemical, biological, historical, geographic, political, with the idea of reducing segregation barriers and making students more knowledgeable
But reality is a direct feedback, nine classes together, stress on the students, and the school's schedule is messed up
It was only a year away, and it stopped
It's not a simple failure, it's a clear confirmation. Examinations are designed not only for ideality, but also for basic education
This kind of experience has since entered the national perspective of reform
The real value is not because it tried it once, but because it marked the pit on the road
From 2003 to 2007, jiangsu introduced “3+1+1” in addition to the number of languages, students picked two out of six, 15 in combination
Sounds like the choice is open, but it's not. Shun
Schools need to take care of a large number of different combinations at the same time. Class organization has become complicated. There are no candidates for cold subjects
Students are chosen and schools bear the costs of moving
At that point, the other side of the reform came out, the system was free, but the system didn't necessarily follow
Jiangsu felt a crucial fact in this sectionElectoral sectionIt's not just for students to pick, but to follow the curriculum, teachers, career paths, professional requirements
It's hard and realistic
It's not just a score, it's connected to the middle school teaching order, it's linked to the university admission logic
In 2008, jiangsu changed its approach to “3+academies + comprehensive qualitative assessment”, with a total score of 480 and an elective section classified by grade
The system is still designed to reflect the differences between students and provide a buffer for basic education
But a new paradox soon emerged
If you don't have enough grades, you'll get stuck out of some schools
It's not a simple fraction change for candidates, it's a different way of evaluating, and the results have changed in order
On the face of it, the grade system stopped the scores and actually replaced one ruler with another
Changed the ruler doesn't mean it's fair
In those years, jiangsu parents and candidates discussed the system very intensively, focusing on the relationship between the results of the basics and the results of the electives
The experience of this phase was later written into the idea of national reform. Lee
One thing is clear: freedom of choice requires boundaries, evaluation is clear, admission rules are clear
If the system can't be understood, anxiety will come first
Before and after 2010, jiangsu adjusted the original scheme by planning, wiring and taking it separately
This step suggests that jiangsu has admitted one thing in practice, and that it is not easy to get away with it completely. Land
It's not a bad idea, it's a reality structure that doesn't support it
Students have to choose, schools have to teach, universities have to accept, and society is looking at professional prospects. Head
This experience of jiangsu has left a clear signal for the subsequent reforms, which must not only seek apparent openness, but also consider operational costs
Reform itself and as part of governance capacity
By 2018, jiangsu had entered the “3+1+2” model pilot and officially landed in 2021. This round of designs drew on several previous experiences
Language, mathematics, foreign language common examination, physical and history one, political, geographic, chemical, biological, two, and initial and grade scores together into total achievement
The point of this structure is that it takes two things together
On the one hand, the country needs to select people suitable for professional studies, and on the other hand, students need relatively clear choices
Physics or history as the preferred subject, which is to bring the literature back to the main line, with the latter two being treated in a hierarchical manner to avoid direct hard comparison between the different subjects
It's not going back, it's going back to the bends around the front
For 20 years, jiangsu has been doing something that's not mysterious
Put it right here. It's a big deal
Because reform of the examination is never a paper design, and the cost of any deviation is on candidates, teachers, schools
Jiangsu is often sampled not only because he has enough resources, but also because he has enough internal differences, which are clearly different at the tertiary level, in the industrial structure, and in the conditions of teaching staff
In the same province, there are both developed regions and areas with relatively weak foundations, a structure that makes the results of the reforms more visible
If a system can work in jiangsu, the provincial capital is more willing to study it
If jiangsudu lives, the rest of the world will be cautious
After the new high test, the new paradox didn't disappear, it just changed shape
Physics has become a key option in the eyes of many students, and the heat of history has changed. Fine
Students see more choices, schools see more running costs
No one can relax
Ordinary families are particularly sensitive, because they don't care about institutional terms, but about how children choose not to lose
There is an extension of the reality that many provinces later faced with a similar situation, with a strong physical examination, a relative concentration of literary and historical examinations, and that schools can only replace teachers, change curricula and change evaluations in order to adapt to new models
Jiangsu's path is not just his own
It turns "how to change" into "how to live after reform."
It doesn't sound, but it does
In the jiangsu sample, there's also an irreconcilable topic, the difference between urban and rural students' access to resources
The comprehensive quality evaluation, which would have taken into account the full development of students, could have been asymmetrical in terms of competition opportunities, social practices and platforms of activity for some rural candidates
This is why, at the policy level, special programmes for rural areas will be maintained, and part of the quota will be allocated to quality higher education institutions in the provinces, especially for candidates from rural and poor areas
It's not decorating, it's recouping
The system has to move forward, and no starting point differences can be considered non-existent
The value of jiangsu koko reform is not that every step is beautiful, but that it spreads many hidden contradictions ahead of time
Why the big whole thing stopped, why the hierarchy was controversial, why the freedom of choice brought about a new division, why the shift came to school
These feedbacks are not just in-provincial experiences, but also constitute an important reference for the new national examination
If you look at these 20 years together, jiangsu's handing over not a perfect volume, but a record that will make it less crooked
The most important thing in this record is that it doesn't describe reform as a matter of ease
Change always costs money
The costs fall on students' choices, on teachers' classes, on school management, on parents' anxiety
But if we don't change it, the old conflict will keep pressing
The special thing about jiangsu is that it's always in the middle of this shit
One is to make the system more flexible, the other is to make the results more stable, the other is to take care of individual interests, and the other is to keep it fair. Line
These three things never happen easily
What is really left of jiangsu gacau reform is not a single model, but a set of practices that have been tried, changed, pressed, readjusted
It's not easy or easy
But it turns a lot of abstract policy words into reality for students every day
That's why it's been discussed
Now, if you look at it, it's not just the test itself
It shows that education reform is not a one-off move, but a long-term fix
There are places to let go, places to tighten, places to acknowledge reality, places to preserve ideals
The differences will continue
Some value the choice of space, others value the fairness of the exam, some feel that physics should be stabilized, and others think that children should not be locked in the direction too early
These voices will not be unified in a short time
And jiangsu just put these voices on the same table