In rural areas, the most serious fear is the demolition of land. Many farmers have spent their whole lives guarding a few acres, large huts and a fruit tree, working hard to feed their families。
In reality, however, the vast majority of the peasants are losing ground. For reasons of economy, many conscripts and village cadres are directly entitled to “one-size-fits-all compensation”: regardless of the open land, the seedlings, the vegetable fields, the fruit trees, the high standard huts, all of which are paid in accordance with minimum standards。
Many farmers have carefully managed orchards, invested in tens of thousands of sheds, which were finally settled at low prices, without any justification for their heavy losses。
Today it is clear to all farmers that the new law of 2026 prohibits low-cost compensation
I. Authority rumours: no village-wide minimum price for packing
Many people have been misled by the phrase “one village-wide standard, no one special”。
This is the greatest area of error in the expropriations and the most typical low-reimbursement formula。
In accordance with the land administration act, the most recent rules on compensation for expropriation clearly state:
Land expropriation compensation is divided into four blocks of land compensation, settlement assistance, seedling compensation, land attachment compensation, sub-assembly assessment, sub-registration and sub-compensation, with a strict ban on consolidation and distribution。
To put it simply:
Others are idle and can only pay for their land
In your home, you grow crops, build huts, grow fruit-bearing trees over the years, with higher inputs and higher output, and compensation must be much higher than the open land standard。
There is no way that a single low price can be consolidated across the village。
Ii. Three low-pressure compensation packages for the worst-off farmers
Many farmers have stepped on these three traps to avoid them in advance。
The first one, a one-size-fits-all. Full harmonization of minimum seedling standard payments, regardless of cash crops, food crops, mature crops and seedling crops, will directly reduce the value of seedlings。
Second, the sheds are centrally paid under the sheds. A large number of farmers have built large-cost steel sheds, hot sheds and greenhouses, which are settled in a uniform manner on the basis of common simple film sheds, with a significant difference。
Third, fruit trees are flat and low regardless of age. The flat prices of fruit-bearing, high-yielding tree trees and newly planted seedlings, with total disregard for farm households ' multi-year conservation inputs, seriously damage farmers ' interests。
All three of these operations are in the form of non-compliance compensation and farmers have the right to refuse to sign the agreement directly。
Iii. Types of land attachments, formal standard of lawful compensation
To teach you the proper standard of payment and never be fooled again:
Compensation for seedlings: cash crops, such as vegetables and medicinal products, are much better than ordinary food crops, based on the seasonal crop varieties, maturity and annual value。
(c) compensation for fruit trees: strict distinction between seedlings, primary fruits, fruits, and old fruit trees, with the highest compensation for fruit trees in the fertilizing period, several times the amount of seedlings。
(b) compensation for large sheds: distinguishing between ordinary arches, steel-mounted standard sheds, smart greenhouse sheds, assessed on the basis of cost of construction, number of years of use, precise configuration of facilities。
(b) compensation for vegetable land and gardens: higher than the standard of compensation for ordinary arable land, in the category of quality arable land。
All assets on the ground must be counted, photographed, signed and confirmed, and all missing, missing and packed items are invalid。
Iv. Improper compensation and a holistic approach to farmers ' rights
First, early retention of evidence. On the first day of the expropriation, a video photograph of the status of the land, crops, sheds and fruit trees was taken in all directions and the original evidence was retained。
Secondly, there is a strong rejection of oral agreements. All compensation, unit price, total amount of compensation must be written into the agreement in writing, and no verbal undertaking shall be counted。
Thirdly, low-cost compensation for packing was found and the signature was refused directly. As long as the counterparty does not follow the sub-criteria and imposes a one-size-fits-all refusal to sign, the signature is a default low price loss。
Fourthly, an application for reassessment of the review. A third party may be requested to re-evaluate the count from the office of natural resources and extortion。
Fifth, collective legitimate rights. The multi-household villagers ' compensation is not reasonable and can provide joint feedback for the re-accounting of the compensation programme in accordance with the law。
V. The truth is: once in a lifetime, don't be dumb
Land expropriations and demolition compensations are available to many farmers only once in their lifetime。
Every crop in the earth, every fruit tree and every hut is the bottom of the home of the peasants, day after day。
Remember the law of the land rally in 2026: free land, seedlings, sheds, fruit trees, no packing, no distribution, no cutting
Unjustifiably low-cost compensation, uncompromising, unsigned, unacknowledged and legally secure their entire lives。
