When it comes to sound headphones, many people's first reaction is expensive. But over the years, i've been using them, and i've found that even-handed headsets have actually improved more than flagship ships. There is no need to stare at high-end models as long as they are not particularly demanding, listening to songs, commuting or flying occasionally。
Many of the cost-friendly headphones are now no longer the “low-frequency, in-depth” level of the past, and are becoming more and more like wearing, renewing and reducing noise. The first ear of some products is not necessarily amazing, but it is more suitable for ordinary people to use it for long periods of time, given the fact that the two hours on the subway can contain most of the noise and power。
Of course, cheapness and profitability are not the same thing. Sony, beats have brands and tone accumulations, and brands such as soundcore and earfun are more willing to set up in good faith, but there are still obvious trade-offs for each product. I'm more concerned about not how beautiful the table of parameters is, in combination with the low-cost headphones that i've been exposed to over the years, but about the fact that i've been wearing a long list of uncomfortable, insatiable voices, and whether the noise reduction and the continuation of the voyage can cope with real commuting. These are the two models that i've screened and thought are more interesting。
Best parity headphones: beats studio pro
Beats studio pro just released, i didn't think it was worth it. Two thousand different prices, and it's hard to convince me that beats is on the outside and apple ecology alone。
What really changed my mind was its subsequent price reduction. If it comes to activities up to and down to $1,500, or even lower, the headset is completely different. It is not a particular exaggeration, but it is something that is basically needed every day: noise, sound tolerance, folding, apples and andre's mobile phones. It's really important that it doesn't take half a day to get it back。
Studio pro's appearance is not new, it's the typical beats. Some feel a little old, others like this simple, highly visible design. Personally, i don't mind, at least it's not as heavy as some headset, folding it up and stuffing it in a bag. It is not a problem to wear a soft ear pad and normal commuting for one or two hours, but the beam still has a bit of a trap, and it would be better for the larger person to try it first than to read it on the internet。
The sound is different from that of the beats. The low frequency is still strong, but it is no longer the feeling that when the drums come out, the other voices are covered. The sound of popular, rock and electronic music is more pleasurable than the sound of humans. It did not give users too much space for balancing devices, which i felt at first was a disadvantage, and then found that for most people it would be more economical — without making a fuss, the default voice had been more stable。
Noise reduction is sufficient and clearly felt. The metro, air conditioning and low-frequency noise on the aircraft are all under pressure, but do not expect it to erase the sound of the next person and the impact of the construction. It's better than the noise, and sony and bose's flagships. Studio pro's advantage is not here, it's more like a headphone without obvious bias。
I like it better if it doesn't work on andre's phone. When iphone is used, rapid connection, spatial audio and system set-up are easy; in exchange for an android cell phone, it can also be adapted through beats, and leave iphone without basic play, as is the case for some apple parts. Added to the usb-c cable is a real relief for people who often switch between mobile phones, tablets and computers。
So the headphones can't be priced. The original price, i would hardly choose; down to about $1,500, it came out attractive. Its sound quality is not the least expensive, and noise reduction does not make it into the first ladder, but it is easy to go out, sound is not bad, two platforms are compatible and there are no significant gaps in functionality. For those who do not want to spend much time studying headphones, this “buying back is not easy to regret” product is more recommendable。
Headphones with more acoustic headphones in 700 dollars: umelody
When i saw the umelody and the ux ldac edition, i first noticed not the appearance, but the price of 639 dollars, which was inserted into a configuration that was not very common at the same price。
There's not much of a $600 headphone right now, but a lot of the ideas are the same: make the noise reduction, write the continuation numbers nicely, and have a shell that looks like a flagship. The ux ldac version does not follow this route, and it is clearly more willing to spend on chips, audio coding and connection。
This ldac version uses the high express qcc 3095, the third generation s3 audio platform, to support ldac, aptx lossles, aptx hd, aac and sbc. The deal looks like a lot, but it depends on the cell phone. It is easier for andre users to take advantage of it, especially when the mobile phone itself supports the ldac or aptx code, the upper limit for bluetooth transmission is higher. The value of this high-level code is not so obvious in the words of iphone, mainly aac。
On the contrary, i think that this is much more true than simply promoting “flagged sound”. As many of the flat-cost headphone units are not bad, they end up sounding boring, low-frequency, often transmitted and modulated poorly. The ux ldac version uses 40 mm diamond plating amplitudes, while the exclusive app provides 10 equalizers, which can be moved from 32 hz to 16 khz, with a larger range of adjustments per frequency band。
In other words, it does not necessarily ensure that everyone likes to open the box, but at least leaves room for their own voice. You like low frequency, you can dive a little bit; you can hear a lot, you can push the medium. For me, this adaptability is more useful than writing a bunch of acoustic terms that sound powerful, practical and difficult to sense。
The noise section is also interesting. Instead of relying entirely on high-utensor control, it added separate digital noise reduction chips from analog devices. The official noise depth given is 35 ±3db, with the four tiers of self-adaptation, lightness, standards and depth available within the app. I don't think it's necessary to draw conclusions too soon, because noise reduction is not just a chip, but it's just as important to seal ears, mic positions and algorithms。
However, the independent noise-mitigation chip at least indicates that its anc is not a subsidiary function that goes hand in hand. Continued noise, such as metro running, low-frequency air conditioning and engine booms, should be part of its better-fitting capability. It is not realistic to expect the whole world to be quiet when someone talks next to them, or when a keyboard rings in the office。
It really makes me feel good about ux, or three ways to connect. The day-to-day outing allows direct use of blue teeth; access to the dac mode via usb-c when connected to a mobile phone or computer; and 3. 5 mm interface is maintained. These functions are placed on detailed pages, which seem to have little impact and are actually used with great ease。
It weighs about 259 grams and does not belong to a lightweight headphone that can hardly be felt at once, so that it can be rotated in the earband and folded. For long periods of time, it is important not only to look at weight, but also to see whether the head beams are clinked, the ear mask space and whether it is hot. Especially for those with glasses, the feeling after the ear pads are pressed into the mirror leg tends to affect the experience more than a dozen grams。
The continuation of the voyage did not play a particularly exaggerated number. 600mah batteries, with 50 per cent volume and open noise reduction, the official data are about 40 hours full of approximately two hours. Forty hours is not currently the longest price, but enough to cover normal commuting. Listening two or three hours a day can be used for almost a week or two without always thinking about charging。
The ux ldac version is not the kind of headphones that can be recommended to everyone with their eyes closed. It is not necessary to spend $639 to buy a cheap headphone to brush a video; it is also difficult to fully use the value of ldac and aptx in the long term。
It is more suitable for andre users or for people who often switch between mobile phones, computers and cable equipment. You don't just care if you don't have no noise, but you want the blues to be too perfunctory, and you need the usb dac and 3. 5 mm interface, so the headphone has its reasons。
I will not call it the “standover of the thousand flagship”, which is too convenient and easy to overstate expectations. It's more like a product that spends more on money: brand name, design, but sound protocol, double chip noise and three ways of connecting. A $639 purchase is not a particularly loud brand, but a more realistic configuration。
