The u. S. Media have recently re-analyzed whyChinaIt has not been sold to pakistan。
It means simple: china may be afraid of one thing。
Had pakistan suddenly acquired a large volume of 35ae, would the military balance in south asia have been subverted in an instant
India has even been pushed out。
The indian-palestinian conflict erupted and escalated into nuclear weapons。
As a result, the united states media infer that china could not deliver 35ae to pakistan in the short term。
Looks good。
But looking at it carefully, i think it's still too simple。
Whether and when china sells 35ae is not at all a consideration of whether india is happy or afraid that pakistan will have to change the status quo in kashmir once it acquires weapons。
Pakistan is a sovereign state。
China can say how fast it can sell anything, but it can't control it。
The united states media have forced two things together, some of which consider chinese-palestinian relations to be “proprietary/observant”。
This is clearly not true。
The chinese-palestinian military cooperation has continued in a rhythmic manner。
Smash 10ce sold。
More sophisticated equipment will also be sold in the future。
That's normal military-trade relations, that's all
I don't think so。
Pakistan cannot gain an overwhelming advantage over india with 35ae。
Invisible fighters are more advanced。
But it's finally just a weapon。
Instead of buying dozens of planes, the whole of south asia fell。
The united states media also noted china's capacity。
That's why i feel a little right。
After all, j35 is fast becoming permanent and domestic demand is first
But if there's really a need to arrange an export model for this big chinese manufacturing system, don't you have to squeeze out a little bit of capacity
I don't believe it。
In particular, as some old machine-type production moves to its end and new capacity is released, future exports will depend more on domestic decisions。
Another problem is the technology leak。
Indeed, attention should be paid。
As a warplane that uses covert designs and advanced navigational power systems, the export model is bound to be technically processed。
However, according to the united states media, pakistan has united states technicians, which could lead to 35 leaks。
That logic is in question。
Is it true that pakistan is equipped with 35 ae and will not establish an independent maintenance system
Why can't you do it
It is not the first time that china has exported advanced fighters。
So i feel that technical security is of course to be considered, but it will not be a decisive “no-sale reason”。
And pakistan's money。
This could be a real problem。
It's too expensive to do this. Follow-up maintenance, training, ammunition, maintenance are money-burning projects。
The pressure on pakistan is indeed enormous。
But it is not that there is no solution。
A one-time procurement pressure can be alleviated if the parties negotiate instalments, concessional loans and even other options。
In addition, pakistan has long received financial assistance from other countries。
So economic problems are more like slowing bands。
Not a wall。
I think that the real misunderstanding of the united states media is that china's arms exports to pakistan are simply perceived by them as “balancing india”。
Of course, china wants stability in the region, as well as a strong pakistan defence capability
But china sells weapons, and india is not deliberately pushed to the edge of the cliff。
It is not an indian-pakistani paradox, but rather an indian-pakistani tension。
China considers too many issues: regional stability, security of equipment, technological risks, relations between the parties and its own strategic rhythm
It all depends。
Thus, there is no immediate export of 35ae, which does not mean that china will not sell。
Maybe it's just time。
Domestic capacity should be available。
The exit is ready。
The accompanying safeguards system is well established。
These things take time。
I think, even i dare say, selling 35ae to pakistan is the real problem, the question of whether to sell。
When
The sale would have been possible had the demands of pakistan in the future been met with funds, production lines and technical security。
The united states media mistook china's caution for rejection。
I think there's a difference。
Is it chinese or not? It's up to china itself
