In recent times, the owners of electric cars in a number of sub-districts in the country have been throwing up an absurdity: electric cars are becoming more expensive to charge, and the problem is not electricity at all, but service costs have risen dramatically for no reason。
Many of the owners of chinan and tianjin show real billing, which makes it particularly difficult. The cost of electricity is more than 50 cents, the cost of services is $2. 6 per person charged, and the cost of services is less than half the rate, which is five times the cost。
Although the state strictly controlled the cost of electricity, the cost of electricity was kept at a low rate for the people, who thought that charging power was a way to save money. As a result, the high service fees, which are not well understood and not well described, are being harvested and spend a greater amount of money than was expected。
Numerous car owners on the network have made a collective outcry to challenge the misalignment of charging charges on chargers, a controversy over charging service charges that has completely triggered the resentment of their friends。
It is true that it is not spending money that is most painful to the people, it is spending money and being held to death by hidden charges。
The first reaction, after the two billings were all over the internet, was that many of the car owners had been complaining about the first time, saying that the chargement stakes in their own neighborhood were the same set, and that half of the charge was spent on service charges at a time, which was more painful。
A number of people came up and called the operators of the chargers black and felt that they were making hard money from their equipment. But we can't kill all the operators in the first place. The industry has published measurements, set up a set of charging stations, and spends money on equipment, on-line platforms, and regular maintenance, even when cars are running large human-flowing equipment. After deducting expenses, the cost of electricity services is only four cents net. In the event of equipment failure, most of the year's money is spent on water. The cost of charging two-wheeled electric vehicles is naturally higher when they have low capacity to charge a few vehicles all night, and when they are distributed to each degree of electricity, the service costs themselves do have a reasonable reason to increase in terms of industry operations。
But the real anger of internet users is that the operator never earns a little maintenance money, but that the bill is never clear. The state has made it clear that charging stakes must be separated between electricity and service charges, with a clear indication that they are attached to small programs and equipment online, and not only to a general total price. But running through the sub-regions shows that there are few chargers that actually separate the publicity, and that many of the equipment is priced at one total price, and ordinary people have no idea where the money is spent。
Another key point that can be misinterpreted is the introduction in 2025 of a national harmonization requirement for charging charges for chargeable stakes on the basis of actual use of electricity, most of which were paid on time and long. As soon as the rules were changed, many of the drivers compared their previous spending, unconsciously felt the charge price had increased. It's just a change in the way the billing was made, which used to include service charges, but it's not listed separately, the information's running out, and everyone's fire is leaking to operators and the industry。
The internet is also divided into two distinct voices, one who understands the rising costs of the industry and feels that a modest charge for services is not excessive; another large number of car owners simply say it is unacceptable that the state has kept electricity prices low, resulting in an increase in the price of the middle layer, and only ordinary people who cycling. There are two things that need to be distinguished: the end of the industry's capital subsidy, the return of service costs to real costs, and normal adjustment; and the surreptitiously excessive collection of consumer money by using vague rules。
Few are aware of the division of property within it, which is also the key hidden factor in raising the cost of services. Many small-area properties have space rights and the operator has to pay 30 per cent or even half of the cost of the service, which is ultimately fully added to the charge and borne by the owner, if he wants to enter the site to install the chargement. This was preceded by a series of incidents in which small-area properties and operators, in disagreement over the division of the site, were able to launch a high-value kickback. It is simply not possible to reduce the operator's price, and this part of the water extracted from the industry is not squeezed and the charge price is difficult to reduce。
There is also a widespread problem of resupply in old neighbourhoods, where the grid sells electricity to the property, which is then transferred to the charging pillar operator, and where an additional layer is added. If the subdistricts are able to complete the electrical grid for immediate renovation and skip the property chain, the cost of electricity can be settled directly at a low cost to the inhabitants, saving a considerable amount of money。
Even more worrying is the security problem. If the overall charge price continues to be high, many people find it uneconomical to settle their bills, and they re-plug their power lines and push their electric cars home to charge them. Previously, there had been frequent news of fires caused by the charging of wires, which the government had laid in large quantities, with the intention of eliminating fire safety hazards in high-level residential homes, and all previous security repairs had been in vain if the charges were unsanctioned。
Compared to the price of electricity for residents abroad, the domestic price of electricity has always been subsidized by the state, and the price is very pro-people, and the welfare of the population should have been in the hands of the population. Unfortunately, in the last ring, which is recharged in small areas, there are various kinds of non-transparent service charges, layers of property, concessions granted by the state, which are completely invisible to ordinary people. In addition to charging stakes, there are similar problems with secondary water supply, elevator protection and gas retrofitting in the sub-districts. Public services reach the end of the sub-district, which can easily create information-intransparent fee closed loops, and residents can only make passive payments。
Many people feel that all problems can be solved by controlling the pricing of chargeable stakes and keeping the cost of services to a minimum, but it is not that simple。
From the point of view of the station operator, a voice was expressed that the input of equipment and daily maintenance were all cost-effective, that the two-wheeler had a low turnover rate, that insufficient service costs could not be sustained, and that once large areas were closed off, the last victims were ordinary households travelling on daily bicycles。
But more car owners do not agree with this statement, and the high cost should not be unilaterally paid by consumers, and the hidden costs of high property shares and higher prices on the power floor are at the core of the cost hike, and no pressure can be passed on to the people。
What you really want is never completely free charge, but every spending item is clear, the price addition that should not have been made clean up, and the price benefits that the state gives to the population will fall on ordinary people。
It is difficult to find a balance between the real difficulties of the survival of the industry on the one hand, and the real cost of living pressures on the population on the other, and the legitimate demands on both sides。
I don't know if your friends who ride electric cars day after day, are paying a charge for a charge? Do you think the first way to address the cost of charging services is to fix the division of property or to regulate the operation of trademark prices
# on the headline, hotter #
