"uploadid": "v02a62g10003d97iljtqh3g8mbg", "duration": 275. 152, "sourceprovider": "readtt", "contanttype":1, "extra": ""audio text": "this is what we are talking about right now because of this so-called false information. That's what caused thisKim su-hyunAnd this agency he's run byAdvertiserHigh-value claims. Yes, now that the case has been brought to trial because of the fact that the rumours have been brought to justice. There have been new developments in this case, so let's start. Okay, the first point is this advertiser. The amount claimed for kim su-hyun and his brokerage company was significantly reduced. Yes, and now they are only asked to return, and the rest of them are represented. Yeah, what happened in the middle of it? The thing is, this outdoor brand eider they were last year because kim su-hyun called it. In the event of a social dispute, they filed a complaint against kim su-hyun and his broker, gold medalist. As much as 2. 5 billion won in damages. But on august 8, this year, when the seoul central district court was sitting. Eder changed their claim. And the reason for the reduction of the sum to 400 million won was simply to ask for it back. The representational fee for the part of the contract that has not yet been fulfilled. So, what does the court think about this eder motion to change the claim and reduce the claim? The court held that eder had adjusted their claim. It was because they themselves felt that the high amount of damages claimed at the beginning was the same. It was very difficult to be supported by the court, which, yes, had noted it in particular. Eder is now demanding the return of the remaining representational fee, and whether or not it has a legal basis. There is controversy. Well, how does the court tend to settle this case now? The judge was of the opinion that this eder kim su-hyun and his broker company had suffered losses as a result of this allegation by kim seok. Oh, so the judge advised them. It would be preferable to retain the advertising contract and then withdraw the action. The parties each bear their own costs, and that is why this case is. For the first time since kim se yi was taken into custody for prosecution, there were advertisers. The substantive withdrawal of this large claim left only the dispute over the final payment of the contract, which was considered an important turning point in the entire case. All right, let's talk about this ai fake evidence, and this process of qin seok's detention, um, at the time. How did you get kim soo-hyun to the center of this controversy through youtube live broadcasts and press conferences? That's right, he started in march of 2014. On his youtube live broadcast and at a number of press conferences, he said that he had control of kim soo-hyun and the late star kim saiyan. Evidence of a minor's relationship, well, then he even directly accused kim su-hyun of being responsible for the death of kin sai-hyun. Ah, so he's made some public. The recording and the kakaotalk conversations and so on as evidence. And since this happened, kim su-hyun has not only lost his image. Even his new show, knock off. How did the police investigate the evidence that was made public? The police verified his recording and found that it was evidence that it was faked by a generating ai. And then the chat records of kakaotalk were completely made up. It's a scandal for spreading false information and stalking. He was investigated for spreading illegal images, attempted intimidation, etc. In the end, the court also held that he was at risk of being denied a warrant and running away, so he was detained and charged. The last question is, what else does jin su-hyun haveProceedingsIn person? And what will be the next point of concern in this case? This is the case, that is, even though it is. Eder's claim has been reduced a lot, but the fact is that kim su-hyun is facing it now. Besides eider, frombio, classys, cuckoo electroNics and trendmaker and so on. And then the total amount of litigation by these companies has exceeded 10 billion won. Wow, so many corporate claims. When's the next trial? Uh, eider, the third trial in this case is scheduled for august 26th. Will this suit be a key node for the rehabilitation of kim su-hyun? Will there be some change with the inclusion of other similar cases. We're actually talking about this case about kim su-hyun. The key evidence was convicted of forgery, followed by an update of the dramatic change in winds. This case is not just a substantial reduction in the amount claimed; it is in fact a similar dispute. It provides a very important reference. Well, that's all for today, and thank you for listening to us next time. ", "ttts m"https://tosv. Byed. Org/obj/tos-tingtoutiao/ai podcast m== sync, corrected by elderman == @elder man
