In february, ms. Cheng, close to the water company, found “a statement on the use of the water bill paid by the household housekeeper” on the back of the water bill card, according to which ms. Cheng paid for the water bill on a mobile phone to the household housekeeper platform and praised the water billing method, which had been paid by the water company. Who knows that in may she saw an important tip on the water billing card of the water company: “our company has never commissioned a housekeeper to collect the water bill, and the user's contribution from the channel has resulted in a self-inflicted loss”. How can the contribution platform recommended by the water company change? Did the water bill to the housekeeper go to the water company? Ms. Cheng began a series of inquiries。
Ms. Cheng was told by the staff of the water company's office that the “statement for the payment of water by the housekeeper” on the back of the billing card was printed by the media company without the consent of the company, and that the water company had recovered all of it, and that it had printed a reminder on the subsequent billing card, one because it had no commissioning relationship with the housekeeper and the other because the housekeeper's contribution system was inadequate and could not pay for the water. As to ms. Cheng's request to check whether the water bill that had previously been paid for the housekeeper's platform had been paid to the water company, the staff member advised ms. Cheng to check with her business site. Ms. Cheng arrived at her business site at 3 p. M. And the station was closed. Ms. Cheng also called the housekeeper and told her that the housekeeper platform could pay for water and that there were no system deficiencies and that she could check the status of contributions through the telecommunications wing。
Ms. Cheng stated that she was very dissatisfied with the company's arbitrary changes to its contribution platforms, arguing that the company was acting so recklessly and disrespectful to its users and causing trouble to them。
Journalists then learned from the director of the housekeepers that there was no real partnership between the housekeepers ' contributions platform and the water company, and that the platform's water payment system was working with the telecommunications wings, which allowed the paying families to check the status of water contributions by telephone number 4008-011888. According to ha wenlong, water has advised it to stop collecting water bills, but more users are now paying for water through its platform, which, on average, is close to 6,000 a day in the new city alone, so that the housekeeper platform is still collecting water bills。
An employee of the office of the waterworks company, ma, told journalists that, as of 1 july 2015, the water company had opened multiple channels to pay fees in order to facilitate the payment of fees. Citizens (non-intelligent card users) can pay their contributions in the following ways: one, cash contributions through the counter of the bank of china, online banking, mobile banking and telephone banking. 2. Cash contributions through the counter of the china construction bank, atm self-help contributions, online banking, mobile banking, telephone banking self-help payments. 3. Payment of fees for self-service fees at the water and sewerage company limited. 4. Payment of mobile phone contributions through telecommunication wings and self-help contributions through online contributions. In addition, residents and casual users can pay fees across the network, or at any point in the city. The water company has not commissioned the housekeeper to collect the water charges, and the users are advised not to pay for the water on the platform in order to prevent the loss of advocacy difficulties. With regard to the user's challenge that the water company's random change of the platform was causing trouble and irresponsible, the staff member indicated that the “statement for the use of the housekeeper's fee” on the back of the water billing card by the water company had been printed by the printing plant without the consent of the water company。
In response, the law firm yingko (hoo and hot) of beijing city, lawyer zhao ping, stated: under article 377 of our law on contracts, the client may specifically entrust the trustee with one or more matters or, in general, all matters with the trustee. As a result, the water company may commission other agencies to collect water charges through a commissioning contract. The law on contracts also provides that contracts are agreements between natural persons, legal persons and other organizations that are equal subjects, establishing, modifying or terminating civil rights and obligations, and that the person who terminates the contract may terminate it if the parties agree or the conditions for its termination are met. The water company changed its contribution platform, effectively releasing its trust contract with the client, which it naturally could no longer use. However, the water company has commissioned other agencies to collect water bills for the benefit of the population, which should be relatively stable, otherwise it will not be in the hands of the population。
(reporter zhang maple)
