The biadi taxi, which cost $410,000, was supposed to be operational, but the person who actually owned it came in。
Liaoyang city's gold-carrying taxi company, known as 20 taxi owners, recently encountered the same problem, when they suddenly “evaporated” the procedures for operating their own taxis。
410,000 for piadia
“i spent $410,000 a year on taxis, and i had all the paperwork i had agreed to, so why is the car only mine?” liayang's brother wang yong sold the agreement with the taxi。
Wang yong introduced a man named wang tao, who had a car licence plate no. Kt1612 to sell, who said that he and a friend had had $410,000 to pay for it, and had signed a taxi sale agreement with wang tao to buy it。
However, in 2014, when the taxi required an annual check, the head of liayang city finance taxi limited, where the taxi was located, stated that the taxi was owned by wang yong, but that the taxi operation procedures (road transport certificates) were owned by the company, that as of 15 june 2014, the contract for the operation of the car with the taxi company had expired and that if the company was to be rented, it would have to be re-contracted and over $100,000 in collateral。
“when i bought the car, i said, well, it was $410,000, which is more than 60,000, more than the audi's new car, which was equivalent to $350,000 in taxis, and now it's a company.” wang ying is very confused about this: "sell me a cab, is it a car? Shouldn't taxis include formalities?"
At around 11 a. M., the day before yesterday, liaoyang city had gathered in front of the golden taxi company ltd. For more than 10 car owners, who suffered more or less the same treatment as wang yong, with the cost of purchasing taxis being different, the highest of $410,000 and the lowest of more than $50,000. “now that we have been arrested by the shipping authorities, we have no formalities and confiscated my license yesterday.” a taxi driver said。
Operating procedures at the expense of the united nations
Qilong , a journalist from the north network and liao shen evening newspaper, found the head of liayang city's gold rental car company. It's a time when tyrone's face is full of shame." i am the true owner of all the taxi procedures in the name of liayang city, through the legal formalities of 12 december 2013 and the acquisition of liayang city finance taxi ltd., which also includes, of course, all the taxi procedures in the name of the gold industry.” “liaoyang city finance taxi limited”。
It produced a 2013 contract between the company and the contractor for the contractual operation of the liayang city gold rental car, in which a was liaoyang city gold transport car, ltd. And b was the taxi driver. The contract shows that the parties were contractual “to operate under the name of party a during the period of the contract and to provide operational formalities for party b to use during the period of the contract”. The rental operations were owned by party a, i. E., owned by liayang city finance taxi company limited ... The period of contract expires on 15 june 2014.” “the contract was clearly written and the operation was owned by the company, and the taxi driver at that time agreed to sign it, and i now have the right to take it back. If they wish to continue the business, they may renew the contract with me, but they do not accept the need for a risk mortgage.” according to tyrone, it was a gold shipping company that had acquired it on loan, and now taxi drivers do not agree to enter into new contracts and do not pay their own rent and management fees。
Arbitration: validity of contract
The taxi drivers did not agree with the letter of contract for the operation of the liayang city golden taxi, presented by tyrone, and stressed that the contract had been concluded under duress and not by their will。
According to zhao xiao, the former head of liayang city finance taxi limited, “twenty years ago, the formalities for each taxi were 15,000 yuan, which i personally paid for, not related to the taxi driver. All these years, i rented it to them (a taxi driver), never said anything about selling it to them, and they never paid me to buy it from me, and i had nothing to do with the personal business between taxi drivers. All contracts were signed on the voluntary basis of both parties and never were forced.”
On 22 september 2014, the liayang arbitration commission rendered its award that the 2013 contract for the contracting operation of the liayang city finance taxi was valid。
Transport control service: no problem with attribution
Yesterday, at around 3 p. M., deputy director-general han of the road transport administration of liayang city made it clear that the matter had been decided by the liayang arbitration commission that, on the basis of various contractual contracts from 1996 to the present, the operating procedures for the 20 taxis belonging to the company were to be owned by the company. The lack of a clear description of the operating procedures provided by the taxi drivers was a subjective assumption by the drivers. “the department of transport, the public security bureau and the department of letters and visits have all been involved in the investigation, and the government is actively addressing the matter and advising taxi drivers to recover their losses by legal means.” deputy director han stated that all taxis must be operated with operational formalities and, if not carried with them, be fined between $20 and $200 in accordance with the relevant regulations。
Counsel: original owner suspected of fraud
According to mahitu, the attorney-in-chief of liaoning long wind, “the 50,000-dollar biadi sold to $410,000 and the price difference was so wide that it must have included the price of the operating formalities, but ultimately there was no operating formalities, which was a clear fraud”
He analysed the case, which involved the operation of a rental company, depending on the length of the contract between the original owner and the rental company, which, in the case of a year, was certainly not worth the price. If, as the taxi driver said, the former taxi company manager had promised to rent the operating formalities for good, then the former taxi company manager and the original owner were both suspected of false promises and should pay civil compensation to the current owner. At the same time, when the original owner deals with the current owner, the sale agreement entered into between the two parties is ambiguous and the current owner has not discovered it in time, and there is also a certain fault. He's the chief reporter of the north net, liao shen evening
Yesterday, taxis bought at high prices were not operated. The driver believed that his taxi operation procedures were “evaporated”。
Wang di, a journalist with the north net and liao shen evening
