The fish just published a book called "twilight sandpots under $500." not to scare you, but to drink the article of the diarrhea, and then the comment section has an online friend who says i'm bragging about the price
Brother, let's not rush to conclusions. You're right, it's true that within 500 years there's a real mud, but the real mud is not the same as a good pot, much less the same as a good mineral. Now i'm going to start with the cost book of a pot in ie hing, and i'm going to figure out what this price is going to buy, what it's not going to buy, and don't let it get the wrong idea。
I. First-in-first-in-first-in-first-out costs: an account to be taken
The sum of $225-330 is a base cost line, which does not include hidden costs such as design, sub-productivity, equipment, etc!
It's true that within two or 500 years there's real mud, but it's all these types, and you have to see it clearly:
First: extreme mud (market price 100-300)
The material is indeed a purple alluvial mine, but the source of the mine is not desirable, mostly from anhui, zhejiang and even from outside the country. The composition is similar to that of the mine, but scarcity, oil and the sense of quality after burning are often less than the quality of the mine at the yellow mountain. It's often called "painting mud" within the line -- it's true, but it's not true。
Second: low-grade primary mines (market price 300-500 yuan)
It may indeed be a fungible mine, but it uses surface or tailing mines, or more impurity and heavy transfer of mud. The made pots of sand are weak, the colour is gray, the water is poor, tea is not easy to wear and the effects are limited。
Third category: “little defects” or inferiors (market price: $200-400)
It may be the base of the original mine + semi-manual, but it is treated as defective because of the cracking of the kiln, the crooked mouth, the tight cover and rough work. Buying back may leak, be adhesive, be a plaque, and be of much less practical value。
The price does have a “mute mud”, but either the place of origin is wrong, or the quality is poor, or the taste is defective — you paint it cheap, and it gives you the “worst match”。
Iii. Analysis of the live chat: listen to the sound of the string
Four, let's think about it peacefully
If you want to discuss this more rationally, you can understand this:
Within $500, the purple sandpots are often given priority for “materials”. But the “real” of the price is essentially a resonance of excavated mud, low-grade or defective minerals. Just like the leather shoes we usually buy, they're skin-skinned and synthetic, and there's a quality ladder inside the real purple sandal。
The word "real" highlighted during the live broadcast is often a word game with a broad concept of material. So, at this price, we expect to get a semi-articular canteen with a piece of mud, a crafted, well-satisfied mine
In any case, within $500, “real” purple sand can be bought, but it's hard to get a better purple sandpot。
"the real mud" can be bought within 500, but "good pot" cannot be bought
We can find the leaks, but we can't find the "excellents."
It's true to call "the real thing" in the air, but "the real thing" is in 369s, and you get cheap, and he gives you "the real worst."。
If you don't believe in evil, tear down the original purple sandpot that you stole from 199 and test it for mud, and if it's the yellow dragon mountain mine plus semi-manufacturing, i'll recycle it and send you a full hand。
Wanna play
I told you not to pay for it
