How can you ignore the law if you're lying about shipping
Zhang
It was reported that a “after-90s” young man, after discovering a lacuna in the rules of freight insurance for internet buying platforms, had fraudulently filed more than 4,800 orders, fraudulently receiving more than $73,000 in the form of freight insurance for goods that were subject to freight insurance and then applying for return. The man was recently sentenced by the court to three years ' imprisonment, suspended for three years and a fine of $20,000 for insurance fraud. It's a simple reason to tell us that not all wool can be swollen。
The risk of freight costs in net purchases is that buyers can obtain freight security when there is a need to return the goods, and that sellers can increase the volume of their goods, which is an easy shopping service to transfer the risk of reimbursement of the freight costs, but is targeted and exploited by the outlaws as a “law treasure” to enrich the household, not just a breach of the rules, but also a disregard for the law。
Freight insurance, although low in cost, is also a form of insurance, using the platform's freight insurance payout gap to run the return process, to make up for unaccomplished freight insurance accidents, to obtain freight insurance compensation to meet a higher standard and to constitute insurance fraud under article 198 of our criminal code. It will be a heavy price to pay for the short-term gain. At the same time, the large number of false transactions behind such operations has directly led to an increase in the number of false sales from web-based trading platforms, which has a negative impact on the development of integrity systems in the electricity sector and the healthy development of the internet economy。
In recent years, the development of the digital economy on the internet has led to the creation of the “shell-back” community, which uses a variety of preferential marketing policies, such as “return” of merchants, to reap a certain amount of revenue, as well as the use by some, in order to obtain greater economic benefits, of the concessions offered by merchants as a profit-making tool, using loopholes in the rules and techniques of merchants, making profit from fraudulent transactions, the illegal use of other people's identity information, the use of off-site software technology, etc., and even creating a specially arbitrated chain of the grey industry. Such operations have caused considerable losses to businesses, both against their original intent and at the same time at the bottom of the law。
The incident raised alarms among many businesses. The internet operator, as the subject of the transaction, needs to further enhance its own preventive capacity in terms of rule-making, risk monitoring, etc. Market regulators also need to continuously update and improve their regulatory mechanisms, cut the chain of industrial interests in a timely manner and help internet enterprises to cover their gaps. At the same time, the public sector must promote the sound and orderly development of the internet economy by vigorously promoting the development of the integrity of the network and the timely publication of typical examples, leading to rational and legal use by consumers。
(by the people's procuratorate of tunzhou, beijing)
