In the previous period, 100 stationmasters had published an article entitled " there is no 100 degrees of pagerank and weight in the world " , which described how 100 degrees of appreciation of a website was dynamic and comprised of hundreds of strategies. This scoring strategy of the value of the website has to be quite rigorous. For the 100-degree search engine, it can judge, and for us to stand? How can we judge the value of a website?
Based on a record?
I know that many station chiefs exchange friendship links with others, using third-party tools to check some of the indicators on the site before doing so. For example, if we do not use a third-party tool to search, we can only use a site command to look for a single whole of the site, and this site is just a reference, and we can't see the true index of the other, and we can only look at the index of the site with a third-party tool, such as a station header. If we don't have 100 weights, it's not fair for us to judge the value of a website by simply taking the count. You know that the number of pages recorded does not mean that they are valuable, so it is not advisable to judge the quality of a website by simply taking the count!
An external link?
We used to look at each other's external links when exchanging friendship links or analysing competitors. A few years ago, the outsider had been the tacit “rule” of seo personnel. So when you analyze your competitors, you focus on the external links to each other's websites. A 100-degree external chain tool can be used to analyse the external chain of competitors, but sometimes the dates are incomplete and the full external chain of the counterparty is not necessarily checked. Using the domain command is only a reference value. So, when we judge each other's websites, the outside links are not enough to show the quality of each other's websites。
With 100 degrees?
In the past, special attention has been paid to snapshots of each other's websites when exchanging links, and many still believe that the websites are not up to date and that they are not well served by the search engine, thus making website snapshots impossible to update. This is a reference to a 100-degree official article, entitled " notes on the 100-degree snapshots " , which contains some of the 100-degree snapshots. One of the best sites to show that 100-degree snapshots will not affect the ranking of the website is the blog of luzonson. A search of luzonson's blog shows that his website's snapshot date is still in 2013, but it's still not down, and the keyword rankings are still good. So a 100-degree snapshot doesn't indicate the quality of a website。
We really need a hundred weights
Of course, we can't judge the quality of a website if we export individual indicators such as the domain age of the site, the link on the first page of the site, or the quality of a site! How do we judge? Indeed, we really need a “100 weights”. Because, according to google’s pr values, 100% weight is the composite indicator of the quality of a website, and without 100% weight, we cannot judge the good or bad of each other’s website。
We can't get each other's traffic statistics account codes, we can't understand the real traffic on each other's websites, and the tools we use, or some of the indicators we use for command queries, are estimates. And we can only use third-party tools for reference! And the methods of measuring the quality of the pages mentioned in the white paper on the quality of the 100-degree search engine pages are only appropriate for optimizing people's ability to adjust their websites, and we believe that we have the right to repeat it!
