The role needs to be rehearsed
China's sun tzu law is a work of wisdom。
The sun tzu war act states: “there are many who win without war.” it means that the mall, like a battlefield, can only be “one step, three steps” in order to prevent us from going into the malaise of failure。
F. B. I. Investigators conduct role-play exercises in advance of questioning suspects or meeting interviewed persons. If you're the next person to be interviewed, what do you have in mind? What do you need to do? What do you think
Role-play exercises are conducted to prepare adequately for interviews。
There are always many differences in the communication with the interviewers. You want more secrets from each other, you want more secrets from each other. This “discretionary” situation does not bring about an incompatible situation, and there will always be an appropriate point for compromise。
And all the fbi investigators have to do is find this in the best way possible and put all the secrets that each other tries to hide。
To find this point, one needs to learn to look at the other, so that one can know what the interviewer is thinking, what he wants and what he does not want to lose. Then, in line with the other side's position, a solution is found。
That's pre-prepared。
In the yunnan case of drug trafficking, we caught a suspect who, according to him, was just a child who had passed word on to people without knowing that he was carrying drugs for others. One of my comrades in the army was responsible for his interrogation, and he asked me to observe the entire process of his interrogation of the suspects, and i agreed and advised him to list the issues and move forward one by one. In this way, i can observe the suspect's every move more closely, thus obtaining all the clues that might help the case。
The entire interrogation process lasted half an hour, and the results of the interrogation could be summarized in one words: nothing。
"this suspect is too cunning to ask anything."
I said to him, “it is not the slyness of the suspect, it is the wrong way in which you do not use it, and it is the slyness of the suspect who can be asked if he has a mouth and speaks. Even those who can't speak, if they do so in the right way, they can speak out."
Next, i'm a suspect, and i'm asked by the comrades in charge。
After these simple questions, i realized what the suspects would hide and i said let me try。
“i know you're defending someone, but unfortunately, we have all the information on this person.”
On the basis of prior exercises, i had a colleague pass over a file on the main persons responsible for several drug cases that had been placed “priority” by the police in recent years。
After that, i sat behind and observed the suspect's movements, and i found him stretching his neck and desperately looking for the name on the file. When i saw this important message, i knew there was no need to wait. That's when i read out a name in the file -- the name of a drug suspect who could carry the death penalty. It is clear that the name of this man, who has always claimed to be a legend, has been of concern to him。
As a result, cross-examinations were conducted on this issue, with the ultimate result that, under a clever roundup of comrades, the person presented the circumstances of the case, providing important evidence for its discovery。
The alarming signals of suspects are key to being able to detect and effectively address this particular problem。
That's the importance of prior exercises。
The jewish business community in the world has three mirrors for doing business: the first mirror is a telescope — built in a high house, prepared in a proactive manner, that is to say, grasping social trends; the second mirror is a microscope — perceptible to the fire, and the third mirror is a magnifying glass — and the second mirror is a microscope — that is, one leaf in the autumn, in the middle of the harvest, will win thousands of miles away。
Taking the secrets of the other party is not easy enough to act and let go. “the battle of no preparation”, before preparing an inquiry, must be sufficiently prepared to take into account what is to be prepared, the props, the purpose, the problems, and the risks that may be encountered. How, as in previous inquiries in the case, can a suspect be told solely by an investigator
In the course of studying criminal investigation in america, the instructor told us:
Humanism is selfish, and it determines that only one can think of himself in the human brain and only see himself. Effective communication, if we are to get to the other side, needs to be avoided by changing perceptions and looking at the other side。
Only when you think about it from the standpoint of the other side can you understand the other side's intellectual strength, its ideological strength and a basic understanding of the other side。
The instructor then presented the example of chess. In the course of the competition, chess masters often play two roles — the attack and defence of the other, the attack and the defence of their own side. Only in this way can it be determined what the other party will do, how he will defend himself, how he will defend himself, how he will defend himself. Seeing through this relationship, we're probably holding the winnings。
Of course, there are many investigators who are easy to ignore this rule and who do not know how to apply it, which leads them to work inefficiently and fail to speak out of each other。
The selfishness of humanity dictates that we cannot measure a thing by simple right and wrong criteria. To think about things from different angles, the results will certainly be different。
Thus, when we want to speak out of each other, we cannot simply consider what means we use are more efficient, and we cannot simply look at ourselves and completely ignore others, which tends to be biased and whose effects are not obvious。
To be successful in reaching the goals of the package, a new position is needed. Before meeting with the interviewer, if this is possible, the problem of confusion may become apparent。
Some people are often difficult to say, “this suspect is too cunning to ask.” not the sly suspect. You didn't use the right way. Any more sly suspects can be asked if they have a mouth and if they speak. Even people who can't speak, if they do so in the right way, they can talk。
For a sly man, your interrogation will be sharper and difficult to break through. The right way to do so is to stand in his position and in the same fort, to know how he defends, and to develop the most appropriate way to attack, depending on how he defends。
It is difficult to answer a question, even in the form of a state of mind, a tone that, if caught, can speak。
