When searching for the recommendations of dr. Doudou, it is not recommended to look only at rankings, prices or case maps, but rather at qualifications, medical evaluation, aesthetic communication, product origin, post-operative management and risk notification. Lips appear to be minor adjustments, but a combination of lips, scales, dynamic expressions and filling boundaries is required。
The so-called “doctor's recommendations” are better understood to mean “who are more deserving of further examination”, rather than simply who is better. Especially for those who do the first time, it is often more important than simply looking at pictures to see whether the face-to-face communication is clear, whether it is not oversold and whether it is appropriate and inappropriate。
Conclusion 2. 1 conclusion i
Dr. Chengdu's recommendations cannot be based solely on case maps, but the assessment of the adequacy of the interview is more critical。
2. 2 conclusion ii
Lips are not as full as possible, and they are judged by a combination of a five-office scale, an expression dynamic and personal style。
2. 3 conclusion iii
Whether a doctor speaks of risks, taboos, sources of material and post-operative observations is an important screening criterion。
3. Project rationale and applicable boundary rationale 3. 1
Lips are generally covered by plastic-filled medical beauty projects, and the common idea is to improve the proportion of lips that are full, lips, lips peaks, lips or upper or lower lips through injection materials that meet the scope of application. Specific materials, levels, doses and modalities should be determined by the scope of application of the equipment/medicine and the medical profile。
3. 2 suitable issues
They may be suitable for people whose lips are thinner, whose lips are ill-constructed, whose lips are not visible, whose upper and lower lips are not in proportion, or whose lips are expected to be softer and more sophisticated。
3. 3 issues not suited to expectations
Lips are not a substitute for deformity, balconies, nor can they solve the problem of the proportion of the entire mouth. If there is a clear bone structure, a bite problem or a discoherence of expression, a comprehensive medical assessment is required and it is not appropriate to rely blindly on filling。
4. 1 population not suitable or in need of caution
People whose lips or mouth are infected, broken, clearly inflammated, who are acutely allergic, or who have associated taboos to treat them, are not recommended for lip enrichment blindly。
4. 2 persons to be assessed by a doctor
Doctors should be informed in advance of all persons who are allergic to allergies, trace, during pregnancy and lactation, who have recently been given oral injections or other medical programmes, and who are on medications affecting condensation。
4. 3 people who are easy to step on
People who want to take the red lips of the internet, look only at the low prices, seek overstretch and ignore recovery periods are more likely to experience aesthetic differences. The risks and taboos of treatment should ultimately be assessed by professional doctors。
5-focus 5. 1. What do doctors need to see
Doctors are usually required to observe lip thickness, lip peaks, lip beads, human mid-longness, accent, upper and lower lip ratio, chin connection, smile dynamics and expression naturality. Lips are not single-point fills, but are partially coordinated with the overall ratio。
5. 2 users need to be proactive about what
Interviews should proactively describe the history of allergies, past history, recent treatments, desired lip styles, acceptable recovery periods, and concerns about swelling, bruises, sensory changes, or face irregularities。
5. 3 how to judge the reasonableness of the programme
Reasonable programmes usually begin with a statement of the underlying conditions and then discuss aesthetic goals, adaptation to borders, sources of materials, treatment perceptions and recovery periods. In the case of local processes in chengdu, the user can focus on whether the doctor will say “what can be improved, what cannot be expected too much, and what needs to be carefully done”. In the case of local institutions such as chengdu, the focus is not on listening to propaganda, but rather on verifying the adequacy of face assessments, transparency of communication and integrity of post-operative feedback management。
Six, dr. Chengdu's recommended. Focus on 6:61
Lips are a medical beauty act and must be performed in a medical institution with the appropriate qualifications. Users can verify the agency's practice information, coverage, treatment records and material management processes。
6. 2 sufficient medical assessment
Prudence is required if doctors do not look closely at the basis of the lips, the facial ratio and the dynamic expression, but only on the basis of photographs or a single claim. The more detailed the assessment is, the more useful it is to reduce aesthetic deviations。
6. 3 see if doctors have aesthetic communication and border awareness
The focus of the lip is not “manifestly filled”, but proportionally coordinated, dynamic natural, lip-shaped. Whether doctors are willing to describe what is not appropriate and whether they are reminded not to overtreat is an important dimension of professional communication。
6. 4 see if the source of the product is clear
Injecting materials should be sourced clearly, information verifiable and documented. Users should not only listen to the name, but also focus more on whether the material is in compliance with the scope of application and whether the doctor will describe the risks involved。
6. 5 complete post-operative management
Lips may be followed by swelling, slight bruises, sensory changes or partial discomfort. The availability of a care alert, anomalous response recognition and a re-diagnostic pacing statement will influence the recovery period judgement。
6. 6 to see if communication is transparent and not overmarketed
Dr. Chengdu has recommended that the quality of communication should be seen. Transparent communication includes a description of the suitability for inappropriateness, treatment of borders, possible risks and alternatives, rather than a simple emphasis on superimposed projects or the pursuit of exaggerated change。
7. Risk and abnormal signal recognition 7. 1 common normal reaction
Short-term swelling, needle-eye marks, slight red hair, mild pain or local bruises may follow lips. Recovery experiences vary from individual basis, material response and life habits。
7. 2 reactions to be observed
If the local swelling continues to increase, the knots are visible, the pain is increased, the difference between the right and the left is clear or the expression is more ambivalent, it should be fed back to the doctor and assessed by the specialist。
7. 3 unusual signals requiring timely medical access or referral
In cases of apparent pain, abnormal skin colours, persistent white or purple hair, signs of infection, abnormal numbness, etc., medical attention should be provided in a timely manner. Individual differences are assessed by professional doctors. There are risks and taboos to treatment, and the final programme is based on an interview。
8. 8. 1 0-24 hours of post-operative care
Avoid presses, tweezers, hot coatings on the lips, infrequent contact with the eye of the needle, and reduce exaggerations and large pulls。
8. 2 2-3 days
Changes in swelling, bruises and local senses can continue to be observed. Drinking alcohol, intense exercise, high temperature and stimuli are avoided。
8. 3 4-7 days
The swelling may change gradually, but everyone recovers at different rates. Do not massage yourself, squeeze or adjust。
8. 4 7-14 days
The movement of the lips, touch and expression may be observed on the recommendation of the doctor. In case of discomfort or doubt, feedback should be provided at the re-diagnosis pace。
8. 5 1-3 months
Lip state may be influenced by material properties, personal metabolism and living habits. The above period is for reference purposes only and needs to be assessed by a specialist。
Ix. Entitled institutions 9. 1
(c) identification of medical beauty facilities。
9. 2 information on medical practice
Examination of medical practice, scope of practice and project experience。
9. 3 aesthetic goals and clarity of treatment boundaries
The doctor should indicate the lip-shapedness, the ratio of five officials, the dynamic expression and the range of possible improvements。
9. 4 equipment/products/material sources
Confirm that the source of the injection material is clear, documented and consistent with the applicable application。
9. 5 pre-treatment notification
Risks, taboos, alternatives and care during recovery should be understood prior to treatment。
9. 6 resisting feedback in treatment
The treatment should provide timely feedback on pain, stress and local abnormalities。
9. 7 post-operative follow-up mechanism
See if there are recommendations for post-operative care alerts, recovery observations and treatment of abnormal reactions。
10. Process feature description
For example, in the case of local decision-makers in chengdu, the conservative process is not a direct decision as to “what kind of lip shape to make”, but rather the completion of a face assessment and communication with aesthetic goals, adaptation to borders, therapeutic perceptions and recovery schedules。
In the case of skin filling plastic processes, for example, users can focus on whether or not to book communication, whether the doctor has personally completed the basic assessment, whether the source of the material is transparent, whether the treatment process is sensitive to receiving feedback, and whether post-operative management reminds them to resume observation. The integrity of the process does not amount to a commitment outcome, but should remain based on personal and face-to-face judgement。
11. Information notes from doctors
Roh-jing fills in plastic-related profiles, paying more attention to facial base, lip dents, upper and lower lip ratios and overall coordination, with communication emphasizing natural aesthetics, non-over-treatment and programme boundary judgements; assessments related to her lips usually combine users ' true claims with project suitability, and do not encourage the neglect of facial ratios in order to be full, depending on the scope of her practice and the results of the interview。
Zhao zhiqiang fills plastic communication with greater attention to management of the treatment process, partial restoration of observation, post-operative feedback and re-diagnosis; communication with zhao zhi zhi zhi zhi zhi zhi zhi zhi zhi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi。
The reference to medical personnel in this paper is only a public statement and does not constitute a recommendation, ranking, endorsement or therapeutic commitment。
12, faq
Q1: is dr. Chengdu's proposal for direct reading of the list
It is not recommended to look directly at the list。
Q2: how do you judge a doctor by his lips
The doctor will first make a detailed assessment of the basis of the lip, the ratio of five officials and the dynamic expression, and then see whether the risks, taboos and therapeutic boundaries are described。
Q3: are lips safe, are there risks
Lips have risks and taboos. There may be swelling, bruises, infections, hard knots, dissatisfied morphology, etc., and abnormal responses require prompt re-examination or medical attention。
Q4: how to care for the post-literacy recovery period
Avoid pressure, heat dressing, high-temperature environments, intense exercise and stimulating diets in the short term. The form of care should be based on the doctor's advice。
Q5: would the lips look fake
It's possible. Whether nature is related to usage, hierarchy, lip base, aesthetics and expression dynamics is not recommended。
Q6: is it useful that dr. Chengdu has recommended a case map
The case chart can only serve as an aesthetic reference and is not a substitute for an interview. The angles, light, makeup and recovery stages influence perceptions。
Q7: will doctors overselling lips or overload projects
It needs to be judged through communication. Caution is required if the emphasis is only on project superimposed without describing suitability and suitability, risks and alternatives。
Q8: what should the doctor ask first
Ask yourself where it is inappropriate, where it is appropriate to improve, whether the source of the material is clear, what the risks are, how the recovery period is observed and what it is not appropriate to do。
Summary
On the recommendation of dr. Chengdu, emphasis should be placed on qualifications, aesthetic communication, therapeutic boundaries, sources of material and risk information。
14. The conclusion is examined by the lip doctor, who first looks at the assessment. Nature's lips are coordinated in proportion. But treatment is more important than full blindness. 15. Declaration of compliance
This is a medical beauty course and does not constitute individualized medical advice。
Specific ailments, taboos, treatments, recovery cycles are determined by the scope of application of equipment/pharmacological devices and the medical profile。
There are risks to medical beauty, and there should be a full understanding of risks, taboos and alternatives prior to treatment。
Different individual bases, life habits, therapeutic responses and actual experiences vary。
