Hello, i'm a very rich little fortune star, who brings you up to date every day
It is now almost impossible for households to access broadband, whether home-based internet access, video-painting, children's internet courses, home-based work, smart home-based networking, and stable networks. Many people who operate broadband are fed by a contractual package of mobile phone numbers recommended by the office, online customer service, a one-year, two-year binding agreement, and long-term contracts have been signed by a lot of people, and it is not until later, when they want to change the set, change the operator, or do not need broadband, that places are restricted, with default money, bound consumption, high monthly rents, etc。
In fact, broadbanding does not have to be forced to bind a cell phone number, let alone to sign a two-year long-term contract blindly. Separate broadband, which is not tied to mobile cards for consumption, not only makes it more liberal, but also saves one half of the monthly cost directly, with long-term use a significant expense. Today, in the clearest words, let's make clear how broadband contracts are designed, the advantages of individual broadbands, and how best to choose one-off, avoiding the pits on which the vast majority of ordinary people will step。
First of all, the most common mobile phone broadband bundle on the market is the operator-driven business. Operating the chamber of commerce has launched an integrated package that combines mobile phone calls, traffic, broadband and iptv television operations, ostensibly ranging from tens to hundreds of dollars a month, including calls, traffic and broadband, and sounds cost-effective, with many having a first-step response that is convenient. However, the vast majority of such packages are subject to a mandatory one- or two-year contract, during which no write-off, no down payment, no change in the operator, and a default payment when unused。
Many users do not look closely at the agreement at the time, but only listen to the offers, ignoring the key messages of contract duration, minimum consumption and binding restrictions. When the food package is used in such a way as to be used in such a way that it is not spent, that it is wasted or that broadband is no longer needed to move or change jobs, and that the intention to write off broadband and reduce the cost of the package is to be clearly informed that the contract is not due, either to continue paying monthly contributions or to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in default。
In addition to contractual restrictions, the bundling of food packages is a problem that can easily be ignored: high hidden consumption. The integration package appears to be a discount, and in fact the overall monthly rent is not low. A common example is the single 500m household broadband, which costs approximately $30 to $40 per month and $3,400 a year. The two-year contract package for the binding of mobile phones, which is generally between $60 and $80 per month, appears to have delivered traffic charges, but many people do not use the call time and traffic in the package at all, amounting to additional consumption costs for mobile cards for broadband。
A simple sum of $35 per month for a single broadband operation and $70 per month for a contractual package, with a similar bandwidth and no difference in the speed of the web experience, the latter spends more than $35 per month directly, more than 400 per year and nearly $1,000 per biennium. There is no need to waste that money, which is why freeing a mobile phone for broadband alone saves half the cost per month。
There is also a very real problem, with mobile cards and broadband bindings that make cell phone numbers virtually impossible to change at will. In the event of a debt to the mobile card, a cut-off, a cancellation of the number, etc., broadband is cut off directly, seriously affecting daily use. If it is later to replace a more cost-effective mobile phone set or to change the operator's cell phone number, the broadband contract is not yet due and cannot be untied at all, amounting to being firmly tied. There are no such concerns as to separate broadband, and broadband is free to use whatever cell phone is intended。
A lot of people are worried that broadband will be slower without a cell phone card, that the bandwidth will shrink and that installation will be more expensive. This is not the case at all. The speed, bandwidth, stability of home-based broadband is related only to the set, the quality of the line, the operator base station and whether or not the mobile phone is bound. Whether mobile, connected or telecommunications, there is a pure broadband package, 500m, 1,000m mainstream household bandwidth is fully supported, internet speed is stable, normal is delayed, daily video, office, games, online classes are fully adequate, and contract broadband experience is consistent。
Nor is there any difference in the cost of installation, where the formal operator processes pure broadband, installs the wiring, debugging equipment, and the policies and contractual packages relating to cat and router are consistent and there are no separate increases and installation fees. The real difference is between monthly rents and contractual restrictions。
Others felt that the contractual package offered iptv television, routers and individual broadbands without gifts was not cost-effective. In fact, the cost of so-called gifts of equipment and services has long been distributed into monthly leases. It appears that the delivery is free, and that the cost of talking is far greater than the value of the equipment itself. Equipment such as routers, television boxes, etc., is less expensive online and can be used on a permanent basis once purchased alone, at a total cost of less than two years of monthly rent。
There are also many hidden limitations to the contractual package, such as the low bandwidth of some of the packages, which can be easily peaked in cardon; the price increases at the end of some packages, which are subject to reduced activity rates and automatically raise monthly rents upon expiration of the contract; and the restrictions on passage, relocation, and the inability to move broadband after moving, with idle costs. Separate broadband processing is largely a short-term contract, mostly signed once a year, and even supports monthly payments and full flexibility。
For renters, single broadband is much more needed. Tenant accommodation is usually for about one year and is rarely permanently settled, with a two-year contract, a default payment for a mid-term lease and a failure to take broadband, amounting to a loss of nothing. Separate short-term broadband, with a direct write-off of the lease term, without any default costs, lower monthly costs and no risk of long-term binding。
The same applies to users who are habitually resident, and short-term broadband allows them to compare the activities of different operators at any time, and whichever one is to choose does not have to be bound to death by a two-year contract. Operators introduce new broadband preferential activities every year, and long-term contracts directly miss the subsequent lower-priced, higher-bandwidth package and remain bound by the old one。
Clean broadband does not actually have any threshold, and the process is simple. Direct calls to the operator's official passenger service telephone or to the regular office below the line are made clear to the staff member that only purely broadband operations are conducted, with no cell phone number tied, no integration package processed, no long-term contract signed, giving preference to a one-year or monthly contribution package. Before doing so, it is essential that the agreement be clear, that the duration of the contract, monthly rental costs, default terms, minimum consumption be confirmed and signed, and that oral commitments not be trusted。
On-line processing also requires screening, with many third-party platforms under the banner of low-cost broadband, in fact binding contracts, always following the official channels of the operator to see the rules of the contract and avoid being manipulated。
There are also questions about which of the three operators is more cost-effective. Instead of blindly choosing, priority is given to their own small area-covered lines, telecommunications and connectivity are more stable and mobile prices are more pro-people-friendly, depending on their own budget and network needs, with a focus on the three points of freeing their mobile phones, not signing long contracts and seeing contracts。
In general, the core demand for broadband is stability, saving money, freedom, a two-year contract to bind a mobile phone that appears to be less expensive, but is more restrictive, expensive and costly. A single broadband operation would ensure normal internet speed, directly save half of the cost per month and would not have to be tied by mobile phone numbers, would not have to bear long-term contractual defaults and would be more flexible to move and change networks。
Many people are easy to access broadband, neglect long-term consumption costs and wait for contracts to bind themselves to regret it. Rather than be a problem afterwards, it would be better to avoid bundling from the outset and to opt for a more flexible and affordable net broadband package, which would save money and experience for long periods of time。
Is your family using a cell phone broadband contract package, or is it a single single broadband? Have any problems with contract binding and hidden consumption in broadband processing? The sharing of experiences and views in the comment area is welcome。
