It is called a “human cell production plant” that has a strong repair, antioxidation, etc. And can also divide into other cells with different functions。
The medical industry is also focused on this "high technology", "dry cell injection", "dry cell culture", "dry cell filling"..
There are a wide variety of advertisements and “cop-ups” on the internet, which make it look as if the challenges of youth, instant beauty and health improvement are within reach。
So, is this "high technology" really universal in medical surgery? Is it really your stem cells? On 13 may, the simens ming district court reported on such a case。
Xiao mei, introduced by a friend, came to the beauty and plastics (alias) of the beautiful people and wanted to carry out a breast-raising project. Although ordinary prosthetic filling operations took tens of thousands of dollars, xiao mei, on the recommendation of the client service, opted for “dry cell” fillings and paid $450,000 for surgical services。
After the operation, mei, who felt that her chest was not well, went to the beauty clinic and asked for an invoice and found that the procedure had been turned into a “self-fat combined with urea acid filling chest surgery”. She requested access to the sos form and found that the procedure recorded on the table was “cell breast”。
In view of the discrepancy between the material and the actual use of the medically well-known materials and the large difference in the cost of the two operations, xiao mei complained to the health and safety board. After investigation, xiao mei's surgeon did not meet the conditions of the attending physician and admitted that the so-called "cell breast" in the sos form was a cytophate breast, and that the beauty of the beautiful woman was ordered to be overhauled and fined. On this basis, xiao mei appealed to the court for reimbursement of the cost of the operation。
The company considers that the failure to fill out, maintain medical records and comply with medical and medical norms is a problem in the management of the shop, and the health service has imposed administrative penalties, which require the company to modify and fine it. Moreover, it was a dispute arising from medical beauty activities and should not be reduced to three in accordance with the relevant provisions of consumer protection law。
The court found that the decision to impose administrative penalties issued by the department of health, which had established that the medical doctor had failed to fill out the required medical records, forged medical records and, in conjunction with her surgeons, admitted that the “cell breast” was a urea acid breast, and found that the pre-operative promotion of “dry cell breast enlargement” was not consistent with the actual implementation of “self-fat in combination with urea chest filling”. The court upheld the claim of xiao mei for refunds and corresponding compensation。
The morning report is available at the district court
Blasts, rights channels: use the market to download the “morning video” client, search the “help” key to the “morning help” platform; or call the hotline 0731-85571188. Government content service, 1917699651。
