I. Equivalent competitions and investments: budget increases and disruptions? It's all here
Many bosses have plans to fill all peer competitions, resulting in a very high percentage of system uncontrollable flows, with a self-defined consumption ratio of less than 40 per cent。
The lower the budget, the more the system deals with similar flows; the higher the budget, the greater the volume, the direct collapse, the absence of a split plan in the preceding period and the lack of space for later adjustments。
The best and the best
1. Batch operations: 15 competitions split into two plans, one with a batch, staggered competition and avoiding cross-border traffic
2. Prioritization of plans
- first tier: competitive advantage goods + self-defined competition (account weights are unlocked for best results)
- second platoon: similar commodities + custom competition
- third platoon: same commodity + custom competition
3. Plan failure and split, no frequent creation of new maps, no fissionable competition of the same kind, only staggered group operations for long periods
4. The breakdown is focused on the precise counterpart, does not run unconnected flows, and preserves its price and human advantage
Ii. Is the lead going to work? It's the exclusive matching rule
Your store has been able to settle the crowd assets, and it's possible to start a small trail, and it can be tested with a single budget of $100:
1. The previous period was marked by a high level of traffic consumption, and the previous period of consultations were extremely effective
2. Long-term lead will slowly consume l3-l5 high-quality assets, leading to high levels of consultation and poor client quality
3. Data overlaps need not be confused and the overall cost of the questionnaire should not be discontinued
4. Looping: a week off for a period of time, with rotations on, to avoid long-term dilution of labels by the l1 and l2 low-priced population
5. Multi-channel non-conflict: straight-through truck space, similar goods and inputs, full station, clues, break-in of search + recommended traffic
Iii. Low-priced peer-to-peer hits. The truth isn't someone else's. It's a different combination of channels
You see a few bucks for each other's hits, not a straight-through:
- low-cost peers = full station + clues + crowd promotion multi-channel mix, down to full-channel average ppc
- purely straight through to maximize the cost of a hit, same as you
- if you don't get high-priced, high-quality people's merchants, you'll be able to take over high-value customers
- the bottom of your store itself is better than that of your colleague
Iv. Trend star hf response cold start, matchup, choice of words, plan package solution
1. Trends are accurate without consulting
Directly abandon the trend and turn the card slots into permeability, either the subject matter does not work, or the headings do not fit the trend, and the asterisk term is deleted directly。
2. Trends control hits are effective and no additional budget is maintained
Avoiding generalization of flows, stabilizing the ranking is sufficient, and not blindly raising the budget to disrupt the label。
3. Planned cold start-up cycle
All smart plans are launched in a two-day cold, trend stars look at the five-day long-term data and determine the retention or replacement theme。
4. Can you drive a card
Yes, trend after card. Trends can be effective without high prices, and trends cannot be replaced by bottoms。
5. Is trend star class useful
For reference purposes only, low-star precisions can pop the list and high-star trash is not consulted。
6. How to rationalize budget allocations
The daily maximization of 80 per cent + 20 per cent of the harvest, with small shops giving priority to breaking down small budget plans and making it easier to eat new daily flow pools than a few large budget plans。
7. How does the ppc continue to fall
If you look at the ranking first, the ranking normally increases the daily limit directly; the ranking drops first, locks first, then increases the budget flow。
8. Trend unswerving additions, conversions
The lock is accurate and the price is still not valid, and the control clicks are simply abandoned and replaced by the maximum harvest plan。
What if there's no trend theme
Do not randomly select unrelated themes, use standard planned keywords, make small sales, and so on, automatically match exclusive trend words。
V. Core thinking for the entire year on the list
1. Build solid crowd assets, then match clues and provide a full-stop feed
2. The competition will never be a pot of stew, with a series of plans to defend and maintain the ranking
3. Not blindly and cheaply, pc. The list of visitors is based only on the quality of the consultation, the price of the customer unit, and long-term production
4. Trends, maximization, card cycling, data cannot be changed immediately, and no single plan is used
5. Shop weights do not fall off the cliff without dealing with short-term fluctuations and making data transitions
Being a top-notch consulter has never been more expensive than who, but has been more logical than the plan, with no crowd bias and no competition。
