"uploadid": "v03a62g10003d91e85iljt0ts4g42m0, "duration": 543. 116, "sourceprovider": "readtt", "contanttype": 1, "extra": ""audio text": "let's talk today about the circumstances in which owners can legally comply to request a reduction in property fees. Yes, and what needs to be noted during this process, and what evidence needs to be preserved. Yeah, well, that's a concern of many owners, so let's just start. All right, let's start by looking at the criteria for the court's decision on property deductions. Ok, for example, some owners would choose to refuse to pay property fees because they are not satisfied with property services. What would the courts normally do in such cases? In actual cases, there's a lot of owners who don't think the services are in place. Or, occasionally, the elevators fail and they refuse to pay for their property. But when the property is finally brought before the courts, it is basically required to be fully replenished. It is not sufficient to justify the owner's refusal to pay property fees. Does that mean that only when the property is subject to more serious violations will it be possible for the owner to pay less? Yes, it is true that the defects in the court's general requirement for such services are persistent. It was also a breach of the contract agreement, and then the owner had complete evidence, such as photographs, review of records, reply to complaints, etc., so that the court could decide on a percentage reduction in property costs depending on the circumstances. I see, then i'd like to ask, if there's a serious breach of duty in the property industry in terms of fire protection facilities and the management of fire corridors, can the owner claim a reduction in the property fee? Of course, if it's like a fire-fighting facility, like a fire extinguisher that's out of service, the fire-fighting bolts are empty, and then the fire-fighting tunnel is blocked by vehicles for a long time. In such a case, his in-kind business was a serious breach of his legal obligations. If so, the owner has made repeated visits or complaints, but they remain unresolved. In the event of a security incident, where the consequences are not conceivable, the ordinary court will award a 30 to 50 per cent reduction in property costs. What evidence does the owner need to retain in order to be successful in this case, and what are the property deductions required in the case? The key is to keep it safe. Every time you report, there's your reply to your complaint, as well as a photo or video of the scene, which takes time, place, details, so that if you really go to court, these are very strong evidence. All right, if the control of the sector is broken, the system of door closures is broken, or there is a clear security gap that leads to the theft of property belonging to the owner. In such cases, does the owner have the right to claim property deductions? Yeah, it's like, like, the unit door, or the block door was broken for months. The security guards are then often absent from their posts and outsiders are free to enter or leave. The surveillance broke a big piece and couldn't get the video. If you can prove that you lost something because of the security leaks, you can apply for a property deduction. The percentage of the deduction will be judged by the time of their negligence. I would also like to ask about the sanitation of the public areas in the sub-region, the greening, and the maintenance of some facilities and equipment, if not the estate, how can the owners defend their rights? For example, buildings, basements, main roads of the park, which have been inundated for a long time. Or the greening is all dead and left unattended. The sewers were blocked, and then the stench spread. Cleaning and greening of public areas did not take place and, for example, elevators were often broken and emergency calls failed. There's no one to fix it. The drainage facility was blocked and the area of the road was watered. All of this belongs to the fact that the property did not perform maintenance of the facility as contracted. If you were to say that after a number of written studies, they did not do so for months. Then you can claim a discount on property costs during this period. It turns out that property, without the consent of the owner, increases property costs. In other words, some charges have been added. What about the owner? In this case, the owner has nothing to worry about, because the standards for property fees are written in the contract. If it's the property, you're gonna have to raise the unit price. Or, uh, what else do you charge? There are no costs in these contracts, so you can refuse to pay, and the court will support you, that is, the part that goes beyond the contract. I see. And if the house is vacant for a long time, can the owner apply for less property fees? This is a subdivision, and there is a place where he has a clear legal provision that empty houses can be reduced by property fees. Where there's no such policy, you usually just tell the property in writing. Then there's the relevant, empty proof. For example, electricity and gas, which have been virtually non-used for months, the courts will, depending on the circumstances, reduce their harvests by 10 to 30 per cent, but if you fail to report, it will be difficult to get support. That means public revenue in the neighborhood, like elevator advertising and parking space rent. Who does this money belong to? Then, if the property had never been made public, how would the owner defend it? In fact, these revenues, elevator advertising, rental of ground spaces and operating income from public areas are shared by all owners. The property is subject to quarterly or annual disclosure. If he were to say that he had been hiding the money, and had not given it to anyone, nor had it been used to offset property costs. The owner would be able to go to court and claim a reduction in property costs while recovering his share of the public proceeds. I would also like to know if the property, the water, the electricity, or the restriction on the use of the door, is used to induce owners to pay for the property. What can the owner do about it? This is a clear violation, since it is expressly prohibited under the civil code, and the property is subject to water and electricity outages, and the elevator door is restricted in order to charge for the property. And if that happens, the owner must keep the evidence, the video, the chat, and the cut-off of the notice. Then you can go to court and ask for a reduction in property costs, and you can get property to pay for your losses. Well, if there's a breach of construction in the neighborhood, or some other disturbance, and the property doesn't act, can the owner demand a discount on the property? If there is an owner, there is an unincorporated construction, or the noise disturbs the neighbour, or even the irregular piles of dangerous goods. The property, which was discovered, was neither stopped nor reported to the relevant authorities. If this continues, it is the property that has not done its job. It would also be appropriate for the court to reduce property costs according to specific circumstances. Well, if this property is concerned, there is no formal service contract with the developer or the commission. Or did the owner pay for all his work? If there is no effective property service contract at all, or property, with its own cleaning, security and equipment maintenance, all of it is subcontracted to a third party and then it does nothing for itself. The owner can, request, make a substantial reduction in property costs. In extreme cases, it may even be possible to avoid paying property fees for that period. I see, then let's see, that's a few of the most vulnerable losers in the property waiver. Yes, but what are the reasons why the court will not accept it at all? The most common, for example, is a leak in their own homes. Neighbors are too noisy. The family lost something small and there was no way to prove direct responsibility for the property. And that means that there's no room for a short time. These are the things that the court would hardly support. That's why we don't use them. Well, that means if the owner is really going to go, with property rights, and ask for a reduction in property costs, is there any better way to go? Then what do you have to notice? First of all, take a picture of where you feel the problem. Then it must be written. And i'm going to file a complaint with the building department and one, two, three, four, five, and i'm going to leave them all. If that is not the case, then go back to the law. It is important not to refuse to pay property fees directly because of dissatisfaction with the service, which would probably result in default payments. We understand that today, we are in the process of refreshing the situation in which owners can demand a reduction in property costs. The key then is to preserve the evidence and follow a formal process。all right, that's it, then. Thanks for listening to us next time. Bye-bye. ", "ttts m"https://tosv. Byed. Org/obj/tos-tingtoutiao/ai podcast m== sync, corrected by elderman == @elder man
