During these years, the head of the notary office in chang ning, li sun min, was “problemed”。
The municipal department of justice has explicitly promoted the `four-one-one' service mechanism for lees, which is “one window, one team in one area, one enterprise, one block list” and requires that questions be asked about the `last mile' of integration of notary services into the market。
But how? “who are we looking for, who needs us?” the notaries, who used to sit down and ask for needs and documents from businesses, used to laugh at themselves。
Later, through a bridge between the chang ning district judicial department, the chang ning notary office found a “broker” — a law firm to take over corporate law work. On the one hand, they are legal practitioners, and on the other hand they have the most direct knowledge of business needs。
On one occasion, the chang ning notary and the legal team of a gaming company introduced the self-established platform of certificates, which is more legally effective than the one that is documented in a marketized platform, in case of tort litigation, and directly in a notary's own platform。
However, this game company is unable to work together with determination because of concerns about the risk of leakage of data stored in clouds. In the exchange, one programme was born: without uploading raw data and simply storing hashi values, i. E. Document characterization values, it would be possible to retain hard evidence for post-incident tort disputes while preserving business secrets。
Cooperation was achieved in this regard. Later, the game company successfully went online with its original product, black myth goku, and blew up the global market。
The efforts of the office of the notary for the changning are not an example of an innovative service model, ranging from “stand-in-the-door” to “active attack”, or an enhanced service capability, with a positive digital transformation, which has been shared by notaries in shanghai in recent years。
On the road to digital transformation, a number of notary institutions have been keen to “protect innovation in innovative ways” and to build a platform of evidence with block chains as the bottom-up technology. The city's nord notaries' office has taken the lead in the construction of the “pujiang notary chain” project. The notaries' offices, such as the united pudong, peilin bank and chang ning, have jointly built a notary digital trust infrastructure that is non-removable, retroactive and permanently preserved on the basis of the zone chain, introducing technical modules such as human face recognition and ca certificates, and has served nearly 100 enterprises. The one-stop electronic data-collection platform “rainprint” developed autonomously by the new rainbow bridge notary office was hailed as a “24-hour notary”, providing self-help forensics and preservation services throughout the process, such as video, voice, photographs, documents and web browsing。
More aggressive corporate service stances have been reversed and better service platforms have been put in place, but there have been instances of “hot-faced cold-ass”. “you know what we're important, but you don't know what we can do” is the thing that bothers notaries most。
Li sun min-jin and the lawyer joked that, although they all went through the test and counted half of their peers, the questions of notarization in the original examination paper might have been one or two points, so even some law-related practitioners did not necessarily know what could be resolved by notarization。
In response to this problem, the shanghai notary institutions have addressed the problem of “showing a sense of presence” and moving the service positions to the enterprise's “doorway” to improve the availability of notarized services。
In recent years, the allocation of notary resources in the priority areas has continued to be optimized, with the zhang gang park, the xinjiang bridge development zone, the port-au-prince new zone, the lu jiakou finance city, and the city's north high city zone adding five cooperative notary institutions to focus on the new economy, new areas and new business practices, providing precise and exclusive services。
For example, the xu seki notary, which was accredited by the ministry of justice as the “national model institute of intellectual property rights”, has established branches in the river development area where the demand for intellectual property protection is growing. The new rainbow bridge notary has an exclusive window in the bay zero science, technology and innovation source functional area, focusing on high-frequency requirements such as intellectual property protection, technical contracts and the provision of specialized teams to respond quickly to requests and shorten service cycles。
It is crucial to build long-term partnerships from the point of view of individual services, starting with one partner, to promote a consensus on the recognition that notary services can protect intellectual property throughout the chain of “creation-flow-management-protection”。
For example, in the process of transforming scientific and technological results, there is often a cost-financing modality whereby intellectual property rights, such as patents, trademarks, are valued and invested as capital in companies. However, such pledges are often difficult to accurately value because of their frontier, intangible nature, and financial institutions are afraid to accept them. The role of the notary “security lock” is reflected, in due course, in the ability of the notary to verify the status of the right to pledge, to document the signing and registration of a pledge contract in respect of intellectual property, to ensure the legal validity of the pledge act and to reduce the legal risk of the pledge。
In the rights relief phase, notary services are equally effective. The office of the public prosecutor of xu seki has established relevant facts for the collection of evidence in the case of the undisclosed breach of business secrets in the context of the "face-turkish games" and has issued a certificate for the preservation of evidence, which was ultimately successful. This case is a typical case of intellectual property of the supreme people's court。
At every meeting with the corporate law firm, li sun-min prepares a collection of materials and a long series of presentations, and she has only one thought, from hesitating to “does this notarize” to “does this notarize me” and, over and over and over again, trying to increase the influence of notary institutions。
