
On 3 december, in response to the exchange of goods, kyoto had recently upgraded the current process and introduced a “price-for-money” feature to address the problems of the exchange of goods by users who had no goods and the flow of goods back to users who were dissatisfied with the exchange。
It was suggested that the “trade-off” function could provide consumers with more flexible options for exchanging goods, i. E., when consumers applied for exchange at the kyoto app, they could choose different amounts and categories of goods for which the difference was partly supportive and help traders to become more efficient in handling the exchange。
"performance swaps" are platform generic support functions that do not require commercialization and are not closed; this function applies to self-employed and pop businesses. It was stated that the range of consumer-replaceable goods was within the platform. On the side of the user side, the selected commodities are presented by the same spu, the same store, the platform's recommended goods, and the shopping car. In this way, the “pay-for-money” service can also provide vendors with an increase in orders and opportunities to break circles and reach new users。
In terms of service flow, the whole can be divided into three stages of return, transfer payments and production of new orders. In the exchange chain, when the consumer chooses the price differential for the new commodity, the commodity may be replaced by the original or other commodity within the platform; after identifying the commodity to be replaced, the consumer is required to submit an order and pay the price difference. (the difference = the amount of money that the original order could have been transferred in payment - the amount due at the time of submission of the new order, the result being that the positive number is refunded to the user, and the negative number is offset by the user.) the consumer can then view the order number, service schedule, etc. For the change of the new order in kyoto app。
It has been learned that, when consumers choose new commodities to be replaced, the “difference-for-price” function currently does not support the vendor's designation of the goods recommended for the same store, nor does it support commercial users' applications for the replacement of the goods in the store。








