The test of originality is, to a large extent, a self-deception trick. The effect on the seo is by luck. In fact, it is known to all that it is a pseudo- or semi-initiative and a purely speculative method. Especially when the original detection threshold is 100 per cent higher, the consistency and readability of the article is poor, which greatly reduces the value component, because the originality of the article is based on the results of the test rather than on the user's reading and demand。
One of the main features of original value is integrity。
A full original article would reflect the elements of value from the bottom, and, without uniform modifications and corrections, the risk of editorial forgery would lead to faulty and deviating statements in the content of the article, such as incomplete consistency in the content of the article, difficulties in re-altering it, and the need to have more extensive writing skills or re-adaptation by the original creator, the simple point being the degree of consistency of the article。
But original testing is simply a simple analysis of whether there are similar titles and articles on the internet, and there are significant errors, which can be found in different original detection tools. So if there is a flaw in the integrity of the article, even the original, there is nothing seo can do。
In fact, original testing is a tool for making money。
How exactly can we detect the originality? Can a third-party website tool have the ability and ability to identify the original origin of all web content on a short-term basis? It's impossible to think about it with a small brain, but it's also a recognition of originality, with a high difficulty factor and input cost。
So original tests are all tools for making money, and they specialize in data integration for people who rely on speculative seos。
Why do many seo-related websites access web content
The simplest technical logic is to record the titles and texts of other website content, and then match the combination of synonyms, related words, words, words, paragraphs, symbols, etc., to give the original level。
The fact is that the original test is a false one, but it's a few words that increase the original value, and it's a copy of another's article, and then it's sent to see if it can be faked。
Conclusion: if you're a seo or a clerk doing an original test to get the seo-related work, then you're a failure, and you're a dead end, because you're just a tool。
