"uploadid": "v02a62g3d97k9haljht3ib4i36q0, "duration":315. 559, "sourceprovider": "readtt", "contanttype":1, "extra": ""audio text":""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""Kim su-hyunI don't know. Because of this so-called false rumour, it led him to..AdvertiserThis dispute between us. There have been some new changes, including the amount claimed by the advertiser. It's a big contraction. It could end in two waysReconciliationThe way it is. Yeah, it's been pretty hot lately, too, so let's just start. All right, let's just look at this hot, hot one, between kim soo-hyun and this adProceedingsAh, what's new now? And this case, because he was previously the representative of the youtube channel because he was suspected of spreading it. This false information by kim soo-hyun, then taken into custody for prosecution, changed the course. Oh, that's it. The amount of the original claim has changed, too? Yeah, this eder and it was supposed to be. Kim su-hyun and his broker company paid about 2. 5 billion won. Well, now it's down to 400 million won. And then the reason for its action became that of a request for return. The part of the representation contract that had not yet been fulfilled was a matter of representation, and the court also suggested that both parties could resolve it by way of conciliation. Okay, so, what's the reason for this eider dropping this claim from 2. 5 billion won to 400 million won? That's the eider when it started. Because of this social dispute, kim su-hyun claims damages its brand image. Two and a half billion won, but then it just dropped the reason. The equivalent amount of the representation fee for the outstanding part of the contract was reduced to 400 million won. So what did the court think of eider after he changed his claim? The court actually held that eider was just because the original set of damages was untenable. That's why it changed, um, but the court also said. Even if it were to become the remaining cover of the return, it might not be possible to establish it. Well, how does the court recommend that the parties settle this dispute? The court held that the three parties, eder, kim su-hyun and his brokerage firm were in fact the same. The victims of kim's allegations, um, were advised. One way to deal with this could be to retain the advertising contract and then withdraw the lawsuit, each paying its own costs, which the media also considered to be this time. Advertiser's initiative reduced the claim. It was an important turning point in this series of cases by competing only for the balance of the contract. If they really reconciled, it could affect the rest. A similar lawsuit totalling over 10 billion won. Okay, that's what we're gonna talk about. This al-ai fake evidence of kim see-yi, and the fact that he's being prosecuted, yes, he is. How did you use this network platform to blow it up, and what kind of wind did he start with? It started in march 2002. He's on his youtube live and there's a press conference. Repeatedly claiming that he had evidence of his dealings with kim su-hyun and kim sai-hyun, he even publicly denounced them. Kim soo-hyun said he was responsible for the death of kin saiyan. Well, at the same time, he published some recordings and this kakaotalk conversation, which is actually. This image of kim su-hyun has been severely affected in a short period of time, including a new play by kim su-hyun. It was supposed to be released because it had to be suspended. So how did the police investigate the so-called evidence, and what was the last charge of this kim seok? This korean police station was specifically identified with the evidence he published. And then it turns out that this recording was actually faked with a generator ai. Including this kakaotalk chat record is also completely fabricated. It is a violation of the law on information and communication networks, which is a violation of the reputation for spreading false information. There are also provisions in the act on the punishment of stalking offences, which are investigated by the police. In the end, the court also considered him to be suspected of incriminating and fleeing. He was formally charged with detention. I see, then what we have to focus on is the case of kim soo-hyun, a rehabilitation. What the hell is this? What's the big time point behind this eider case? Following his detention, kim su-hyun's brokerage company also issued an official statement. Appreciation was expressed to all those who cooperated with the investigation. And then the other thing is, uh, eider's case. It's scheduled for august 26th, the third time. Oh, is jin su-hyun facing any other lawsuits besides this eider? Yeah, except for eder, and this, uh, frombio, classes, cuckoo electronics, and trendmaker. In any case, he was sued by a number of companies for damages, which, taken together, exceeded 10 billion won. Well, that's what the outside world is saying about this eder movement that's going to happen. What's the point in these later cases? All right, we're putting this kim su-hyun on the wave today. From the outbreak of this controversy to the forgery of this evidence, to the turning of the case, the whole thing was cleaned up. This case is a real one. And let us see some of the legal games behind this entertainment. That's right. That's where we're going. Thank you for listening. ", "ttts m"https://tosv. Byed. Org/obj/tos-tingtoutiao/ai podcast m== sync, corrected by elderman == @elder man
