The quality of tristar tv is disappointing! When the new room chose tristar tv, the idea was that big brands could be good. As a result, 65 inches of three-star television were purchased in a variety of brands, and after all the new house had to be refurbished and had not been occupied for a long period of time, it was unexpected that a particularly visible yellow vertical line had suddenly appeared on the screen for less than two years, and that, although the purchase time had exceeded the quality assurance period, the real use time was less than two years, and the problem arose and the quality of the three-star product had been questioned. There are many similar problems on the internet that have been experienced by three-star television users, which is a problem on the screen through door-to-door testing, which is not artificial, and which requires $6363 to replace three-star television screens. The price is perfectly good enough to buy a brand-new 65-inch television. I've concluded that three-star televisions are not only more expensive than their own, but also more expensive after they are sold. If you're going to buy samsung tv, think about other brands! I've barely seen this tv, but it's too late for quality assurance, but it can't just go bad. Is it so bad now? Sansung's official offer to pay consumers for their own high maintenance and spare parts on the basis of the quality bond period! There's a door-to-door fee, a test fee, a maintenance fee and a replacement fee! A high-priced screen can buy a new one! There can't be any quality problems for the consumer to pay for it! I'm so disappointed in samsung! I hope the platform will help consumers deal with this in a timely manner
