AnnualI'm going to writeAfter the launch, many people began to comment on the high-level examination, which was the result of the high-level examination. The presentation by the high court led to a popular carnival, and it seems that everyone can say a few words, but often end up scratching their boots. Nothing. However, many felt that they were right and had a say, so that they were part of the flow。
Each year, there is a pool of high-level examinations, which, after all, are organized by the state. They can be selected or eliminated. There is no better way to examine talent if the annual examination is on schedule. Educational development is still lagging behind, in a more monolithic manner, and even in farces where the people selected are not talent. The high examination itself is not necessarily fair and equitable, because there are many subdivisions, local protectionism and even the use of insider trading to interfere with the fair and just attributes of the high examination. Your son has the right to register in remote areas, to study in the interior, to take examinations in remote areas at the time of the examination, to be considered as a remote area, and to enter key universities with slightly lower scores. Immigrants in high school are always the exclusive preserve of the noble, and ordinary people cannot do that. The vast majority of candidates are children of ordinary families, who do not have the same access to advanced examinations as powerful children, nor are they able to follow mentors from an early age, but rather do so with their own efforts. After the education for all (efa) coverage, a large number of people took the high test, and even dreamt of it in their dreams. It was very tense, either to throw away their learning tools, or to feel that there were a lot of things left to do, and they were about to hand over their papers. There are people who dream repeatedly, dream about high school and sweat. It seems that the examination is an important juncture in their lives, after which they can go to college and be eliminated. Although a number of repeaters continue to take the baccalaureate and even 58-year-olds continue to take the baccalaureate, this does not explain the fairness and fairness of the baccalaureate。
It's a bit difficult to get a higher examination, especially in mathematics. Language is relatively difficult, and even a large number of people can comment on the language test and on the high examination. It appears that the value of writing in the examination is high, but in no way can it be fully equated with the language of the examination and with the other subjects of the examination as a whole. However, people in society tend to rush to the high examination level and to judge the language of the examination, even if it is useless and the mouth of the donkey is not right, and it seems that they have the right to speak freely. In fact, most of the koc's writings are positive, and there's some philosophy. Although childish, the philosophy derived from it is generally higher and candidates for higher education are expected to be positive and to produce thought-provoking papers. In addition to reciting many factual and rational arguments, high-level candidates are good at watching things around them, watching the news, commenting on some hot events, and seem to be able to take a positive view, and always correct, and some of the arguments cited are still positive and do not imply the opposite, or use ironic grammaticals, which could result in low scores. High-level candidates refused to make fun of their own future, or dared to write randomly, or to open their pens. Even if there were high-level candidates who used to write in oracle, it would only prove that he has a good knowledge of language and writing, but it does not represent that all his disciplines are better. The entrance exam is full-fledged and ambitious. However, the social truth has not been told, nor has it been told. It is just rhetorical rhetoric, more arguments, more persuasive and more structured. If there were high-level candidates who imitated the rue tact, with the utmost irony, they would probably score low or even zero。
After the presentation, many of the candidates felt that they had written well, but tended to ignore the way in which the papers were presented. If the majority of the candidates, from the point of view only, were to draw a certain philosophy from a positive point of view, it would be essentially good to write a dissertation along those lines. The writing of the article requires that the text be coherent, that factual and reasoned arguments be used, and that the views be clear, identical and strong. The higher the score, the lower the value, if not the point of view, and the logic of the argument. If you want to write your essays, you have to write in the clouds, you still have to quote some classical poems or phrases, you still have to have a certain style, you have to be emotional, you have to be intellectual in order to get high marks. It can be said that it is not easy to write in high school, not only for candidates to have some ability to use words and words, but also for some philosophical knowledge to see the world around them from a philosophical point of view, which must be marxist philosophy, not that of other philosophers, in order to avoid bias. If candidates prefer to write essays, which are not strictly written, then such essays must also maintain the correct perspective, be consistent with marxist philosophy, and not promote something that is heartless, let alone something that is corrupt. With this perspective, and with such criteria, it seems that everyone can write a high examination and everyone can evaluate it。
In the era of traffic, not only did the high examination become a meeting point for the flow, but the high examination writing became a gathering point for the flow. The language education of the nation's people begins at an early age and seems to reach everyone's consciousness. Most of the knowledge of ancient students taking the exam is that the exam is only for one article and that the rules of winning and losing are stated in one article. Although the era of educational progress has passed, with one article to win and lose, many people still have the passion to write articles and evaluate articles, believing that they can be better mixed, even if they are talented. When the gacchi writing comes out, it seems that one can say a few words, and some people can even scratch their hands, writing an article on the ground and getting it to a wide range of online users. It will last for a few days, and when the degree of heat decreases, there will be other behaviours that will replace it, and there will be less interest in the examination and in writing. The papers for the examination were simply an article for the examiner, which, despite certain modus operandi and requirements, was not entirely opened up and did not allow the examiner to write. The evaluation criteria are based only on the evaluation criteria of the essay, not on the evaluation criteria of the print media, but of course on a more uniform or single evaluation criteria. It is impossible to publish it in the press because the articles published in the press are not the same as those written in the university, especially when they have different starting points, different writing methods, different requirements and different evaluation criteria. People are more inclined to read articles in the press than to read essays in high school, because the starting point for writing in high school is so high that it seems to draw the essence from the phenomenon, to set up a certain picture, to produce some philosophy, and to be childish. Although it is also ridiculous to have a hard-on from a high examination, this is how it is set up, which is how it is promoted and how the evaluation begins。
The presentation by the high court has given rise to enthusiasm for universal participation, and even everyone can say a few words, which, of course, meet the requirements of the dominant ideology. There will be no truth, neither will there be a deep search for truth within society, nor will it solve specific social problems. Perhaps the gacchi writing is a scheme that, apart from examining loyalty, is examining the ability to lie, does not fully examine creativity and the ability to look into the truth. It's more like a lie and a lie that's the result of an essay review of the cv。
