In response to the above questions, suggestions for improvements include strengthening the institutional awareness, the fact that three readings cannot be reduced to three readings, and the fact that the third reading system is an interlocking, incremental reading system, which should improve the overall quality of readings in publishing units through a continuous process of upgrading and experience. It is recommended that the system of incentives and constraints be streamlined, that the division of labour and responsibilities between readers at all levels be clarified, that the responsibility for review and final adjudication be further clarified, based on the maintenance of responsibility for editorial responsibility, that the system of incentives and restraint be divided into material and reputational aspects, that the remuneration for revision be divided into basic and floating remuneration in material terms, and that consideration be given to listing reviewers, final reviewers and duty editors on the copyright page respectively. At the same time, attention should be paid to realism, increasing the review power, selecting reviewers should adopt a combination of internal and external approaches, selecting highly competent and highly motivated senior editors within themselves, hiring external experts from older editors who have retired or from other fields outside the industry, making sure that they become full-time review editors, paying attention to the professional composition of reviewers covering as much as possible the main publication areas of the organization, making arrangements for review missions that ensure that professional counterparts are effectively given the right to review。
