Two ideas
On behalf of the members of the commission, the year when the “155” began
The editor's five years to see the first year, the start is the key. As the year when the “155” began, the two national congresses in 2026 gained prominence, not only as an important window for observing china's macroeconomic policy, but also as a basis for a blueprint for development over the next five years. On the occasion of the 2nd national congress, the chinese economic times has asked members of the higher school and the think tank to write theoretical articles to focus onTechnology breakthroughThe central issues of domestic demand, “three farmers” development, fiscal reform, macro-policies, and the silver economy are among those that have contributed。
Member of the national political council, chen xiaohong
Core perspective: it is essential to firmly grasp the core orientation of industrial issues and scientific and technological responses, to make science and technology breakthroughs the first engine of future industrial development, to build on the demands of new quality productive development, to integrate original innovation, technological imperatives, transformation of results and ecological creation, to build a chain-wide, systematic and efficient pattern of innovation development, and to strive to take the lead and win the initiative in global competition for science and technology and industryQuality developmentInjecting durable kinetic energy。
Chen xiaohong
The year 2026 marks the beginning of the “fifty-fifty-fifty” and is also a crucial year for the advancement of the scientific power. Increasing the development of new and dynamic energy and accelerating the strategic positioning of high-level technological self-reliance。
In recent days, during the twenty-fourth collective study by the central political bureau of the communist party of china on forward-looking layout and the development of future industries, the secretary-general of xi jinping has pointed out in depth: “the extent of technological breakthroughs has largely determined the pace, breadth and depth of future industrial development”. This assertion, which is based on a new wave of technological revolution and the evolution of industrial change, has revealed the decisive role of science, technology and innovation in the future industry, providing guidance for the future deployment of industries, the development of new quality productivity and the construction of modern industrial systems。
Deep knowledge of the speed, breadth and depth of technological breakthroughs in future industrial development
Science and technology breakthroughs determine the pace of industrial development in the future, stemming from technology overlay and efficiency in the transformation of results. The future industry is based on subversive technologies, cutting-edge technologies, the original breakthroughs from “0 to 1”, and industrial fissiones from “1 to n”, all premised on technological breakthroughs. The more solid the basic research, the more sophisticated the core technology, and the smoother the transformation chain, the faster the industry lands, and the more efficient the expansion. Without a first breakthrough in the bottom-of-the-ground technology, the future industry will have to stay at the conceptual and experimental stages; only by accelerating the critical core technology cut-off and closing the metrotechnologies can laboratory results be quickly translated into real productivity, leading by technology to pre-empt industry, and winning the lead and initiative in global competition. In a new context geared towards accelerating the evolution of the new scientific and technological revolution and industrial transformation, it is important to focus on improving the efficiency of the transformation of results, strengthening the chinese test platform, the industrial base, the application demonstration landscape, and shortening the cycle of technology from research and development to its application in order to efficiently transform the fast pace that underpins high-quality development, so that science, technology and innovation can truly become powerful engines of industrial efficiency。
Science and technology breakthroughs determine the breadth of future industrial development and stem from technological penetration and transborder integration of radiation. Major technological breakthroughs have a strong permeability and spillover effect, breaking industrial barriers, reshaping industrial boundaries and generating new business models that are multidisciplinary, multi-chamber, multi-story, multi-species. From artificial intelligence, big data endowments, to the expansion of quantum information, biotechnology, space science and technology, to the deep integration of digital technology with the real economy, the wider the boundaries and depths of technological breakthroughs, the wider the coverage of future industries. Science and technology breakthroughs have not only created new industries, but have made it possible to upgrade traditional industries and to create “frontier lead, global empowerment, cross-border symbiotic” industrial ecology, which has led to a shift in industrial systems from single-point breakthroughs to systems. As digital technologies, biotechnology, new materials technologies and new energy technologies intersect, industrial boundaries become increasingly blurred and integration becomes more evident. Only by proactively promoting cross-cutting, interdisciplinary and cross-subject synergies can new spaces for industrial development in the future be expanded and new patterns of multi-point, global-intensity industrial development developed。
Science and technology breakthroughs determine the depth of future industrial development and stem from the high levels of technology and value creation. The core competitiveness of future industries is reflected in the originality of technology, industrial chain control and value creation levels. The closer the technological breakthrough to the source, to the bottom principle and to the “killer” technology, the more resilient and powerful industrial development is. Key core technologies are subject to people's control and industries remain at the middle and low levels; only a fundamental breakthrough in basic theory, core components, critical equipment and standard norms can lead to higher value chains, with a self-controlled, secure and competitive future industrial system firmly in their hands. This requires a combination of objective- and issue-oriented approaches that focus on the global scientific frontier, while building on the real needs of industrial security, continuously increase investment in research and development, strengthen strategic scientific and technological capacity-building, create irreplaceable technological advantages in key areas, support industry's progress towards high-end, intelligent and greening, and constantly raise the profile and influence of our future industry in the global division of labour。
The central orientation of industry issues, technical responses
Following up on the important statement of secretary-general xi, it is important to firmly grasp the central orientation of industrial issues, scientific responses, to make technological breakthroughs the first engine of future industrial development, to build on the requirements of new quality productive development, to integrate original innovation, technological imperatives, transformation of results and ecological construction, to create a chain-wide, systematic and efficient pattern of innovation development, and to strive to take the lead and win the initiative in global competition for science and technology and industry and to inject sustained energy for high-quality development。
First, to strengthen forward-looking layouts and to build a firm base for innovation。
Strengthening the strategic, forward-looking, systematization of basic research and building the foundations of original innovation are prerequisites and the bottom line of scientific and technological responses. Basic research is the total source of science, technology and innovation, and determines the depth of technological breakthroughsIndustrial upgradingBackwards. At present, global science and technology competition moves forward to the basic frontier, and the core competitiveness of future industries is intrinsically rooted in the original breakthrough in basic research. In keeping with industry, it is necessary to refine basic science issues and avoid “two skins” for basic research and industrial applications in the long-term needs of future industries. Focus areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum information, biomanufacture, low-altitude economy, human robotics and so forth will be targeted at strengthening top-level design, building a “strategic lead, forward-looking layout, system support” basic research model, increasing long-term stable inputs and supporting joint advanced exploration by universities, research institutes and enterprises. Focus on the original direction of “0 to 1” principles, core algorithms, key materials, infrastructure, etc., encourage free exploration and target orientation, improve basic research evaluation and incentive mechanisms, and create a climate of scientific research that is ready to sit on benches and work hard. The technology base of the future industry will be consolidated through a systematic layout that will provide an inexhaustible source of supply for key core technological breakthroughs and ensure that technological responses are grounded, backward and bottom-up。
Secondly, to focus on strengths and tackle core challenges。
Using the new institutional strength of nation-building to focus on the “crawling” challenge is a key challenge for technical responses. The new nation-state system represents the country's institutional advantage in achieving its key core technological autonomy and control, enabling it to effectively integrate innovative resources, rally its strength and break the technological bottlenecks that are hard to break in a single subject and in a single area. At present, some of the frontier areas are still dependent on imports of core components, subjection of basic software to people and inadequate levels of process equipment, which directly constrain the security and autonomy of future industries. Industrial demand must be targeted, focusing on strategic areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum information, biomanufacture, low-altitude economy, human robotics, and so forth. Optimizing the allocation of scientific and technological resources by pooling high-quality funds, top-notch talent and high-end platforms, introducing “show-and-show” “military order” for key core technologies, without even-handedness and pepper cover, and ensuring that resources are spent on blades. In order to stay issue-oriented, to focus on the break points, blockages and pain points of the industrial chain, to break through the core technology in a phased manner, to complete the key niches, to achieve ownership of the key links, and to hold the future industry's initiative firmly in its own hands, and to use hard nuclear technology to break through the key issues raised by the industry。
Thirdly, smooth the transformation path and deepen the four-chain integration。
Accelerating the transformation of science and technology results by taking the landscape to the next level, validating the value of innovation in the market, promoting innovation chains, industrial chains, financial chains, and deep integration of the talent chain is the path to the drop-off of technological responses. The ultimate goal of sti is to serve the industry and to benefit society, with poor transformation of results and a disconnect between innovation and industry, leaving science and technology breakthroughs in the laboratory and in the paper. Insisting on industrial questions and technical answers requires opening the way from technological to industrial and economic strength, so that innovation can quickly be translated into real productivity. It is necessary to strengthen the scenario-driven and open a series of demonstration, leading applications to focus on future industries, to upgrade technology in reverse with real demand, so that technology matures in its application and is refined in it. To improve the system of results-based conversion services, building platforms such as conceptual validation centres, test sites, markets for technology transactions, reducing conversion costs, increasing conversion efficiency, and breaking the “labour to industrialization” dilemma of the valley of death. It is necessary to promote the integration of innovation chains, industrial chains, financial chains, and the deep integration of the talent chain, to deploy innovation chains around industrial chains, to organize industrial chains around innovation chains, to channel capital to focus areas, to move talent to front-line jobs, and to form a virtuous circle of “innovation-empowerment industries, industry-resilient innovation”. Through four chains of synergy, science and technology results can be put on the ground quickly, industry needs can be responded to quickly, and innovation values can be realized quickly, so that science and technology responses can be truly effective and beneficial to development。
Fourthly, the institutional environment should be optimized and ecological development should be strengthened。
Improving an inclusive and prudent institutional environment, encouraging innovation, tolerance and failure, and creating a good ecological environment conducive to the emergence of subversive technologies and the growth of future industries, are the guarantors of scientific and technological responses. Future industries rely on subversive technologies with high-risk, high-input, high-return and long-cycle characteristics, and grow in an inclusive, open and stable institutional environment. Traditional regulatory models, with rigid constraints, can easily discourage frontier exploration and misinnovation, and must establish governance concepts that are compatible with future industries and insist on encouraging innovation, keeping the bottom line and inclusiveness. In order to optimize regulation, new technologies, new business practices and new models are to be put in place for “trigger” regulation, “soft regulation”, which gives creative subjects the right space to test them appropriately and avoid death and disruption. Innovative mechanisms must be developed to address the concerns of the innovators by including diligent, unselfish and undesired exploration in the context of science and technology, the transformation of results and the fall of industries. Systems such as intellectual property protection, factor-marketing, fiscal support, etc. Need to be improved to lower innovation thresholds, stimulate innovation dynamism and attract a global set of high-end innovation elements. At the same time, public awareness and social guidance are being strengthened to create a social environment that respects innovation, promotes exploration and supports future industrial development, providing fertile ground for the emergence of subversive technologies and future industrial growth。
(by a member of the chinese academy of engineering, member of the 14th national political consultative conference, director of the shangjiang laboratory)
Chief inspector, the zhao wang army
The king of chen, the king of yang yu
He's the editor, the editor, the editor, and the editor
