It's at homeWater purificationMy friend, the most annoying moment is when it reminds you to change the filter core. After all, it means -- it's going to cost more
Many of the water purifications are especially frequent today, as if they were pushing you to change, otherwise the filters are not "purified water" but "dirty water"
But when the water cleaner tells you to change the filter core, do you really want to change it right away? Wait
I'm a five-year-old water cleaner who dares to talk to you as a man for a filtration。
In these five years, i have never changed the core on time, except for the first year, which is not simply to save money, but is really unnecessary, and listen to me for analysis。
Many water-purificationers do so not by monitoring tds values (i. E., dissolved content in water) in real time, but by very mechanical and error。
One is to remind you of time, for example, half a year or a year, to change the core without taking into account the quality, quantity, frequency of use of the water in your home, which leads to either the core being clean, completely wasted, or already dirty, but not yet changed。
In this case, isn't it unreasonable to change the filtration cores according to this water purification device
The other thing is that it's not very reliable in terms of the flow of water, and many people are located in areas where water quality is good and the filter core is not really dirty, but has already reached the level of 5,000 l, which is a direct reminder to change the core, which is a waste。
A little more precise, depending on the pressure of the filter core to enter and leave the water, or the need to replace the reference lifting core for the pump hours, is also a vague scope that is not very precise。
And what i'm saying above is that the type of filtration core alarm that is most commonly used in mainstream water purification is, on the one hand, less costly and, on the other, probably related to the desire to increase the frequency with which you switch cores..
So how exactly should we judge the timing of the change of the filter core? There are some ways。
I've used a stupid method before, which is to remove the filter core (saw it) after changing the core, and to observe internal contamination, which tends to be dirty, but then more expensive active carbon or ro re-infiltration cores are much cleaner。
The contamination of the pp cotton filter core can be used as a reference, and an approximate frequency can be estimated by comparing the new alarm, the one month after the reminder and the two months after the reminder。
Some families with good water quality and pre-positioned water filters have not changed for two months after the alarm core was replaced, and water purification is still good。
There is also a way to buy a tds test pen directly, and generally the tds value is below 40, or if the tds is less than 600 mg/l, it is safe to drink。
After the water cleaner has pressed you to change the filter core, you just have to get a glass of water and use the tds test pen to detect the tds values below, so you know clearly whether or not to change the filter core。
Following a reminder, only once a week can be measured until a significant increase in the value is observed, indicating that the filter core has reached its limit, that the minimum pre-positioned pp cotton core has been dirty, and that, in order not to affect the discharge of water and back-band filter cores, it will be ok to change the core decisively。
3. Together, we can optimize the final solution。
This is the way to decide whether or not to replace the filter in a truly reasonable range that would ensure daily water safety, without the fact that the water-purifier “pulls you to change the cores” is the only reason why the filters have been replaced and clean, and that they have cost a lot of money for nothing。
It's been five years since my house used a water purification machine。
Seeing here, if i ask you again when the water purification machine reminds you to change the filtration core, should we change it right away
It's from the internet. It's a violation
