National 2026TwoThe curtain falls, a lot of focusPeople's livesThe proposals and recommendations generated popular debate, including the removal of unreasonable transfers and the phasing out of public housing, directly stoke the pain of ordinary people's daily lives and reaped an all-round positive response. There were no slogans, no vague statements, representatives with solid research data and people's claims, and the authorities had given clear ideas for moving forward that had really put people on the table and put them on the agenda。
Almost every employee and house-buyer has a deep sense of it, and for many years they have given up their hopes. This year, instead of being a spontaneous civil discussion, it has moved up to the national level, from proposals to policy responses, where it has become clear that each of these two topics is in keeping with the people's will, which is the central reason why both topics can continue to resonate and resonate。
In this paper, the latest proposals for the lifting of the break, the cancellation of the stands, the advancement plan, the meaning of the people's lives are set out in plain and complete terms, based on the official publication of the two meetings, the public proposals on behalf of the members of the commission and the responses of the authorities. The data are true, logical, non-exaggerated and inflaming, so that people can see what real changes these two initiatives can make in their lives。
I. Electronic: not empty slogans, two-party proposals
A lot of people wonder if it's an online rumor to cancel the break, cancel the stand. It is not true that these two meetings were held in 2026, when representatives of the national people's congress and members of the national political consultative council formally submitted written proposals in the context of a multi-year study on human life, and received positive responses from the authorities concerned, and were included in the agenda for moving forward with the reform of the people。
First, the proposal to eliminate unreasonable transfers should be eliminated. The national people's congress made public proposals during the two sessions to gradually eliminate the compulsory transfer of holidays and not to create extended holidays by collating weekends, but to increase the number of days of statutory holidays, returning them to the nature of rest and guaranteeing the right to normal rest for workers. In his proposal, he mentioned that the multi-year break pattern, which appears to have prolonged the holiday period, had disrupted the pace of life and work for the general public, and that it had not only affected the efficiency of work, but also reduced the well-being of workers, and that the proposal had just been put forward by major media reports, which had made a sudden rush to search, with the support of over 90 million internet users。
At the same time, zhao zhengping, the representative of the national people's congress, has continued to focus on the optimization of vacations. He has proposed for many years the extension of spring holidays and the reduction of transfers, and the nine-day arrangement of spring 2026, without excessive transfers, is the result of the recommendations. At both sessions this year, he further recommended that the arrangements for small leave such as early morning, midday and mid-autumn should be fully optimized and that natural leave should be granted as far as possible, while at the same time a system of paid leave should be put in place so that people could arrange their own rest periods without any further diversion。
The proposal to phase out the share of the housing stock was then considered. The representatives of the national people's congress formally submitted proposals during the two sessions to phase out the public share of housing during the “155” period and to promote the sale, pricing and payment of housing on the basis of the actual size of the housing stock, so that every penny spent by the population on the purchase of the house is spent on the area in which they actually live. In her proposal, she points out, in the context of practical cases, that part of the building is currently untransparent, and that the high share not only allows the purchaser to pay more than the cost of the house, but also to pay for property and heating, depending on the size of the building, which in the long run increases the cost of living and eliminates the share, which is one of the most pressing livelihood demands of home buyers throughout the country。
These two proposals, which have no high-profile professional terminology, are the daily pains that the representatives of the commission have felt, with the voices of the people and the positive response of the authorities concerned, resulting in a virtuous interaction of “the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, the people, and the people。
Ii. Cancel the transfer: a long line of goodbyes and a real break for the holidays
When it comes to transfers, almost every worker has a hard stomach. It was originally intended to ease the rest of the day, with six or seven consecutive days of work ahead of each short and long leave, and to return immediately to high-intensity work, with a number of people saying, “sabbatical is more tiring than work” “disturbing the whole holiday”. In 2026, the proposal for an unreasonable transfer was cancelled, and it was completely stated that it struck the heart of the worker。
1. The pain of the current break is shared by everyone
Under the previous holiday arrangements, long holidays such as spring festivals and national holidays were mostly carried out through the misappropriation of weekends, with three days of small vacations such as dawn, midday, mid-fall and so on, and often with the need for a change of weekends. This arrangement, which seems to have a long leave, poses many problems:
(a) first, severe disruption, continuous work before the festival, physical and mental overdrafts, and the fact that the holidays have not yet slowed down, and that work has yet to return to work, after which the sense of fatigue has continued for several days and the efficiency of the work has significantly decreased
The second is the extremely poor travel experience, which has led to long vacation zones, high speeds, total traffic congestion, out-of-the-house visits to people's heads, a waste of vacation time at home and a significant loss of happiness
Third, the normal double break was taken away from the rest of the weekend, amounting to a “dismantling of the wall” and the workers' actual rest time was not increased, but instead lost the regular rest rhythm。
According to a survey of the population published by the national statistical office in 2025, over 85 per cent of the workers in the workplace are dissatisfied with the current mode of rest and over 70 per cent indicate that it will take longer to adjust their status, with nearly half of the employees in the enterprise saying that the working efficiency of the week after the festival is around 60 per cent. The right to rest and well-being of hundreds of millions of workers, which appears to be a minor matter of holiday arrangements, is also the underlying cause of popular resonance in the proposal to cancel the break。
2. Optimal direction given by the two conferences: no mandatory transfer, additional statutory leave
This year, in response to calls for the cancellation of the transfer, there will be a clear line of excellence, not one-size-fits-all, but a gradual optimization and steady advance, with three core directions:
First, to put an end to unjustified forced breaks, future holiday arrangements, to follow as much as possible the natural weekends, and to give priority to “weeks on weekends without shifts” and to refrain from the arbitrary diversion of weekends for the purpose of collating long vacations. The 2026 holidays of dawn, midday, mid-autumn, etc., have been piloted on natural holidays, without changes, and have yielded a popular review, a model that will be fully replicated。
Secondly, the appropriate increase in the number of days of statutory holidays is no longer dependent on the transfer of long holidays, but rather on the provision of genuine long holidays, such as spring holidays, to be optimized, to reduce the number of days off, to increase the number of days off, and to enable people to spend their whole year in peace and harmony。
Thirdly, the introduction of a system of paid leave is mandatory, and in response to the difficulties encountered in the implementation of paid leave for persons working in the workplace, it is clearly stated that greater supervision is required to ensure that enterprises implement paid leave in accordance with the law, so that workers can arrange their own rest periods, travel and rest at faults, avoiding concentrated congestion and guaranteeing the quality of the rest。
The ministry of human rights and social welfare has also responded during the two sessions, taking into account the proposals made by the delegates and the demands of the public, to optimize the programme of holiday arrangements as soon as possible, to phase out unreasonable transfers, to restore the right to rest to the workers and to return it to the nature of “relaxion, accommodation and leisure”。
3. What changes can be made in the lives of ordinary people following the abolition of transfers
For ordinary people, the removal of unreasonable transfers has brought about changes that are visible and felt:
First of all, it is not necessary to stay up all night to work, to be normal, to be healthier in physical and mental health, and to wear out after the holidays
(b) secondly, vacation arrangements are more liberal, with no hiking, weekends and holidays being taken separately, allowing for short trips and home relaxing, and a straight rise in holiday happiness
Finally, a more balanced working life with a regular rest rhythm can effectively relieve workplace stress, improve productivity and truly achieve “work well and rest well”。
This initiative, which appears to be a minor adjustment to the leave arrangements, is a real guarantee of workers ' rights and interests, leaving the daily care of every worker。
Iii. Canceling the stall: buying a house that is clear and clear, and not spending any more money
If the break is the pain of the workers, the share is the heart of the buyer. When buying a house, there is a wide gap between the size of the building in the contract and the actual area of the condom in hand, the share is not transparent, the fees are non-transparent, the cost is high, the money is spent, and the long-term payment of property and heating fees for the share is a common problem for countless buyers. In 2026, two meetings were held to eliminate the proposal for shared space, giving all buyers hope。
1. The pain in the area of the share, the knowledge of the buyer
The area of public areas such as buildings, elevator wells, halls, fireways, etc., is allocated to each set of houses, taking into account the building area. For a long time, however, there have been many irregularities in the area:
First, there is a lack of transparency in the share, a wide gap between the share of public share of different buildings and buildings, with some high-level housing shares ranging from 25 to 30 per cent and 100 square metres, which are actually only 70 square metres, and the purchaser has no right to know and is passively accepted
(b) second, it would be unreasonable to repeat the charges, to pay for the house on the basis of the building area at the time of the purchase, and to pay for the property, heating, maintenance funds, etc. At the time of occupancy, which would be tantamount to repeated spending on the share area, which would be a significant expense in the long term
Third is the inconsistent calculation criteria, the complex calculation of the area to be shared, and the fact that ordinary buyers simply do not understand it, which is prone to the development of the developers' falsely increasing area to the detriment of the buyer。
According to a study conducted by the national chamber of commerce and industry in 2025, over 90 per cent of home buyers consider the area to be non-transparent, and over 80 per cent support the elimination of the area, at a price based on the actual area of the flat, in which everyone would like to buy the house “whatever they see” and every penny spent is clear。
2. Two-step plan: phase-out, full land landing within five years
In response to the proposal for the elimination of the share area, the ministry of housing and construction responded positively during the two sessions and will develop an implementation programme for the phasing out of the share area, taking into account the representative's proposals and the need to regulate the development of the real estate market。
There are three steps forward:
(a) as a first step, to regulate the existing pool standards, to harmonize the calculation of the pool area in the short term, to enforce the development of public share rates and areas, to make the purchaser aware of the situation and to put an end to the proliferation of the pool and boxing
In the second step, the pilot will be rolled out gradually, with some municipalities selected to take the lead in eliminating the share area and selling it on a permafrost basis, and once the pilot has matured, it will be rolled out to all major cities throughout the country
The third step is to eliminate the accompanying reforms and, once the shares have been eliminated, all property and heating expenses are charged to the actual size of the flat, while the relevant laws and regulations are being improved to guarantee the legitimate rights and interests of the purchasers and to make the purchase of the house and the whole process transparent。
The national people's congress also mentioned in the proposal that the elimination of the share area was not simply a measure of size, but rather an important initiative to regulate the real estate market and safeguard the rights and interests of the population, which would make it easier for the population to buy a home, make housing more affordable and truly achieve the goal of “home-to-house”。
3. What are the real benefits for buyers of housing from the elimination of shareholdings
For ordinary buyers, the benefits are very direct:
(a) first, the purchase of a house is clearly and clearly priced on the basis of the actual size of the condom, as long as it is available, without the need to pay for the excessive size of the building area, and with a more transparent cost, which can effectively save on the purchase of a house
(b) second, long-term costs are reduced and the costs of property, heating, etc. Are covered by the interior area, which saves an annual amount of money and reduces the burden of living in the long term
Thirdly, there is greater security of rights and interests, a uniform standard of sales and fees, an end to the exploitation of the rights and interests of buyers, and a greater sense of security in buying houses。
Both young people who are just about to buy a home and families who have improved their homes, the elimination of public stands can effectively reduce the cost of buying and housing, allow housing to return to residential identity and truly benefit people。
Iv. Why are the two proposals so popular
The removal of the break and the elimination of the stand, which appear to be two unrelated issues of livelihood, can at the same time generate universal resonance for a simple reason: they are close to the daily lives of ordinary people and address the most concerned, direct and realistic issues of interest to all. They are nothing more than public attention。
For many years, diversions and stalls have been a problem for ordinary people, seemingly small matter, but concern everyone's daily happiness. The disruptions affect the daily living and quality of life of the employees, the public stalls affect the personal interests and housing burdens of the purchasers, and everything is related to the salt of wood, food and clothing, and is a daily problem for the people。
In both sessions this year, instead of evading the sufferings of these people, the delegates took the initiative of listening to the people's opinions and reflecting them, without delay, giving clear plans and timetables for moving forward, an attitude of “popularity and responsiveness”, which gives the people a real sense of the fact that the two will always put life first and will always contribute to the well-being of ordinary people。
These two initiatives also convey a clear human orientation: the ultimate goal of development is to provide a better life for the general population, whether by guaranteeing workers ' right to rest or the legitimate rights and interests of home-buyers, in order to improve the quality of life of ordinary people, to enable them to work easily, to live comfortably, and to enjoy a greater sense of happiness and enjoyment。
V. Sustainable strengthening, non-current, between people and practice
It needs to be made clear that the elimination of diversions and shares is a steady advance and a gradual landing, without a one-size-fits-all, one-stop brake, with a full balance between social functioning, market norms and the needs of the population, and with a view to ensuring that reforms are smooth and orderly and do not affect normal productive life and market order。
The elimination of unreasonable transfers is not the abolition of all holidays, but the optimization of leave arrangements, while guaranteeing workers ' right to rest, taking into account the productive and normal functioning of the enterprise, and achieving a balance between rest and work by increasing the number of statutory holidays and introducing paid leave; the elimination of the share area is not an immediate and total stoppage, but rather the regulation, subsequent piloting, extension, giving the real estate market sufficient time to adjust, ensuring that the market is stable and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of home buyers and developers。
This steady advance responds to the demands of the people and takes into account the realities of the situation. It reflects a pragmatic and rational approach to reform, so that people's initiatives can be truly effective and benefit everyone。
It's no big deal. Heart
In 2026, the two popular proposals for the abolition of the break and the elimination of the pool appeared to be minor reforms, but they showed a deep sense of commitment. Life is never an abstract concept, but is hidden in every holiday arrangement, in the interests of every dwelling, in the daily fireworks of ordinary people。
From optimizing the holidays, guaranteeing the right to rest, to regulating the housing market and reducing the burden of buying housing, it is a matter of concern to the general population, which is responsible for solving all the problems, and it is clear that the state has always focused on the lives of ordinary people and has been working tirelessly to improve their well-being。
The advancement of these human reforms will not only make our lives more comfortable and reassuring, but will also convey positive values: hard work will be treated well, hard work will be secured, the demands of every ordinary person will be heard and heeded, and the days will pass。
End interaction
Which one do you expect first to land? Have you ever been disturbed by a break or a stand? What are your expectations and proposals for these two reforms? We welcome the exchange of comments in the comment area to talk about the human changes around us。
The content of this paper is based on the official publication of the two national conferences in 2026, public proposals on behalf of the members and the responses of the authorities, for personal information purposes only, and the cancellation of the break, the cancellation of the share, the execution of the programme, in accordance with the latest national policy and the official circular of the competent authorities。
