
If your life and your work are almost untrustworthy, you usually have to open a web-based version of micro-intelligence or micro-intelligence mac to improve communication efficiency, while trying to cover a growing number of devices, such as ipad; but if you are a “compulsive patient”, you should be reluctant to install an iphone app on the ipad and endure the ambivalence of being stretched out of a clear interface. “unfortunately”, i have two of the above-mentioned features, so, after a long time of patience, when i learned yesterday that the ipad version of weibo had been released, i thought that i could finally experience the ipad in a smooth way。
I experienced a new version of the message first, and on the whole, i was satisfied with the ipad's message: the large screen, with more space for content and more efficient input; unlike computers, the use of the ipad's message is more flexible and functional, with wallets, labels, public signs, games, and, on the interface between discovery and me, the ipad's message is not blindly wider to fill the screen。
The ipad version provides two types of login - regular login and scan of 2d login. Ordinary login means that ipad and iphone use different micro-messages to be “online”, while scanning 2-dimensional login inherits the logic of the mac and web-based version micro-in. Moreover, ipad twitter does not co-exist with the twitter version of mac and the web version, currently supporting only one device online, except for mobile phones。
So, even though the ipad version has more functionality than the mac version of the message, which looks more like a complete one, in fact, the cell phone is used as the main device to log in the message, and the rest of the terminal is merely a supplement。
But in addition to allowing users to log in on twitter on more platforms, at the specific level of experience, the ipad version of twitter makes me a bit uncomfortable for this coercive patient。
For example, today, using web-based or mac-based micro-mail links, users can choose between iphone and mac receiving reminders at the same time, or “stop the mobile phone notification” at the cellular interface. However, there is no option to stop mobile phone notification when ipad versions are connected to mobile phones, which means that if i play the ipad game while i have to get two devices vibrating or bells harassing, and if tweets are sent more frequently, it would be a disaster..
Another thing that bothers people about coercion is the reading mechanism for micro-information. Although, like the web-based version and the pc version, micro-letters take into account the fact that whenever a user has read the message on one device, the message is automatically synchronized with the read state by opening a micro-letter on the other end (although this mechanism often has problems of synchronization). In the ipad version, however, it appears that the letter has forgotten to consider a new “notification” area — the circle of friends. That is to say, when you look at the iphone and respond to new information from the friends' circle, there is still an earlier reminder on ipad that for a “compulsive patient” like me, you have to click on the choice to empty it again。
In addition, every time i return to the wi-fi interface on ipad (withdrawing wi-fi to run it backstage and activate it from backstage), there is a notification reminder on iphone that the ipad micro-mail has been opened. And if the iphone version is running at the front desk, then the ipad version will have to click on the upper left corner to continue using it. A similar situation would not occur at the mac and web sites。
The last thing i'm uncomfortable with is the ipad version of the micro-letter font -- although the ipad version is much more clear than the ipad version, its text display is still appropriate for the size of the cell phone screen, even if i have changed the font selection to the maximum. Clearly, this sense of discord is due to the fact that the product suitability of the twitter team is not yet comprehensive。
These design mechanisms are “distressed” to a large extent because of the prematureness of the ipad version of the micro-intelligence — and, you know, there is no reference to the function of “adaptability ipad” in the wi-information of the ipad update, which you will find only in the wi-infibre-system notice — the main update of wi-in 5. 4. This seems to indicate that ipad micro-credit is not yet complete and may be a test version。
These details, however, are not satisfactory enough to obscure the importance of the ipad version of twitter itself, or to allow users to log in on the ipad and clarify its location as a message receiving terminal, which is the most important task of the ipad twitter at this time:
A mobile im social tool such as wireless, which places users in a “networking” situation in any setting, is the most basic requirement. So, of course, mobile phones are the most important devices. The web-based twitter and twitter mac version, which removes the circle of friends, provides only basic communication functions, depending on the availability of a fixed environment network for its own computers and is suitable only for supplementing the cellular version of twitter. The ipad is in between - it has wi-fi and 3g versions, it requires a fixed network environment as much as very computers, and it has the "always online" attributes of mobile devices. As a result, it was decided that the ispad version would be based on web-based ims, while at the same time bringing it closer to cell phones。
It can be said that the ipad tweet is neither a continuation of web-based twitter nor another iphone tweet, but an ipad tweet — a special product of both。




