In this case, we can only regret the fact that the media colleagues who have commented on the three days of the roll-out of "dr. Shanjia" - if it is understandable that the comments transmitted by the netizens are still in the form of unprofessional and irrational spontaneous behaviour, then the media, as a social organization, are doing a lot less to reveal themselves than the professional qualities of the netizens, and to say that there are still...
Microblogging spreads several screenshots of a young man in his early 20s. This has led to a @ah cal youth red net, which has also led to a number of media blockages. Some say it's a report letter. Some say it should be thoroughly checked. Some say it's ironic that young people follow the “top-level route”, some say it's the bad mood of chinese officials, and some say it's the failure of chinese education. As the new kyoto simply said, “he actually lives in a `rai sung steel'”。
From the point of view of all these reports, it is feared that they are committing an old problem that is common to many media: unverified。
This reminds me of a scene after last spring: a shanghai girl and her boyfriend went home for a new year and left the table because they were not happy with the poor cold. At the time, it was also like the “dude through the mountain” incident, where many media were scrambling to comment on china's countryside, the arrogance of urban residents, and the plight of young people getting married。
However, the results of the incident are well known: the so-called shanghai girl incident has proved to be a lie. According to a survey by the beijing youth reporter, this news, which was generated by a web-based post, was first published in a micro-mail public number that operated agricultural products, which appeared on the internet four years ago, and was thus referred to as false news。
It became a model for “news reverse” in 2016, so that, after all kinds of news had been reversed in 2016, the logic of “no backsliding news” had even emerged。
Turning back to this “burma through the mountain” incident, it is equally unverified. Who's this guy? Who's he having dinner with? Does he eat through the armour? Did he go to the flight room? Did he really take the "high ground" route? Did he have his picture
So far, only the guangxi investment promotion agency has responded that the photographs in bo are carefully identified and that there are no directors or staff of the authority who eat in the photo。
So the author saw a replica of last year's shanghai girl incident: unverified facts, online scoldings, media sieges..。
It is only regrettable here that those media colleagues who have commented on the three days of the roll-out of "dude through the mountain" - if it is understandable that the comments transmitted by the netizens remain unprofessional, irrational and spontaneous - that the media, as a social organization, do not reveal themselves as much as the professional qualities of the netizens, and that many of them are self-proclaimed, high-end, emotional, conscience-based media
So would the "shanghai girl incident" be perjured or simply a joke? In fact, i do not know, but i think that one of the basic guidelines for engaging in the media industry is to admit that i am ignorant of all aspects and, on that basis, to explore the truth, rather than to talk “in the heart” on the basis of unverified facts, after all, that only he knows who lives in the heart. And if, as some people say, he's a high-ranking x-two generation, it's not easy to judge whether rezheng steel flows live in his heart。
So, on the basis of that principle, let's just comb through what we know: an internet friend who claims to have been in contact with officials and who ate a mountain armour and went to the airport of civil aviation, all of which are currently unproven。
So we can only draw three conclusions:
1. The mountain armour is a protective animal, so the picture of the sun “eating through the mountain armour” is not good
2. The event referred to by the netizens is suspected of violating the eight provisions of the act on the protection of animals and should be investigated by the authorities concerned
3. We do not currently know anything about the truth of this matter。
It was to be hoped that a clear finding would be made as soon as possible。
