Recently, a bunch of station chiefs came to me and said that they sent a lot less than a day, and the ranking fell down like a slide
It's true, now there's a lot of treachery about pseudonyms, especially those that change synonyms and sequences, and they've been labeled as "low-quality" and they've stepped through the pits, and they used to eat together, and now they're giving you power in minutes, and they don't even have a chance to complain
I've done this before, i've bought a fake original, i've run a lot to the station, and i've lost a third of the index for six months, and i've got a superstition of the "blast title" party, and i don't even know my mother's name, and it's up there, and i can jump out of the rate sheet, and i'm sure it's not relevant and it's not worth it
In fact, there's only one thing at the core -- deep original -- to make algorithms think that you're really useful, that you're really thinkin', and that's just a couple of steps, and i don't like you
Don't change the title. Read the log
The first reaction is to change the title, add the key word, put the seo "flow" in it, and so on, and so on, and so on, there's a lot of people here who get mixed up, and there's a lot of people who look first at capture and reconciliation, and there's no 200 in the log, and you can't write the title, and it's no use
I used to smoke a spider log for five minutes a day to see which pages had not been climbed, which had not been deciphered, sometimes the url structure was too messy, the parameters were piled up, the spider was tired of walking around; sometimes the page was too slow to load, over three seconds, and it went away, fixed the roads first, the spiders came, and there was a scene
And i didn't want to go through the log manually, and i did it with the ai smart seo assistant, but it's more accurate. It's got a high frequency of 404, slow-crawling pages, and it's got some ideas for optimization, saving me a lot of effort to keep an eye on the screen
Don't count. It's deep
To put it simply, now that users and algorithms are so sophisticated, you can see whether you've worked so hard or whether you've worked so hard, for example, by writing "how to speed up the website" and simply saying "compress pictures, use the cdn" is too shallow, and you have to take it down to the specific scene — how wordpress adjusts the cache plugin parameters, how static resources are divided into domain names, and even the best strategies under different bandwidths
Don't worry, it's not for you to write a paper, it's for you to tell a point, and for the user to read it, and i've tried to break a common problem into three dimensions, each of which is based on measured data, and then it's indexed in three days, with a long flow of words
It's a lot easier to write a piece that a. I. S. E. O.'s assistant can write in bulk. It's a lot easier to tell the subject, but it's just a frame for you. On the surface, the algorithm is unrecognized
Don't believe what's going on all night. Learn
Some of the trainings are "send and record," but most of them are on a new site protection period, or the content is on a hot spot, normal site, three days to one week of recording cycle, and if you stare at "site: domain name" every day, you'll lose your mind
My approach now is to get the content online and then use a chain guide, to tie up the new page and the high-weight page inside the station, and then push the "ordinary entry" at the point of the 100-degree search for the resource platform, instead of pushing the whole brain and picking out the right quality, otherwise it will be easy to label it as a spam
And then there's a little trick, so don't hand it over, and wait half an hour for the spider to climb a circle, and then you push it manually, and you have a higher success rate. I'm guessing the 100-degree algorithm is looking at the "naturality" and it's being deliberately downgraded
Don't be blind. It's logical
Someone pointed all the inner chains to the front page for “centralization”, and the result was that the head page was increased and the interior pages were completely dead, and the anchor text would follow the logic of content, such as “mobile-end fit”, and the chain to specific technical document pages, which would be much more useful than the front page of the chain
You know, there's more chains, spiders, and users get lost, and i usually keep every new piece in three to five inner chains, with as many anchors as possible, and not all with the same keyword, otherwise the algorithm may think you're making it
Don't even think about putting it in place, because it's slow work, because i've seen people change it for two weeks and give it up, but it's late for the algorithm, especially in depth, and it takes time to judge whether you're doing it for a long time
Others say that i can only laugh at the immediate effect of the hair chain, which is now “naturally recommended”, and that you're going to the forum to keep links, mostly as garbage, to attract spiders, so why don't you get a couple of old trades to switch to friends' chains, or write a dry article to make people turn around
After all, it's not quantity, it's quality, you've got it solid, spiders come to eat, users come to stay, traffic and ranking are by-products
Why would q do this
A, because now 100-degree algorithms are getting more and more sophisticated, and it's natural to record them
Q, i don't want to do it manually
A-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-seo-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-s-e-e-e-e-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-e-e-e-e-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a freeze
How soon can q do that
A needs to see how you're doing it
What if q doesn't change
A turns back to logs and grabs, maybe the technical details are stuck. Sometimes it's not about content, it's about road failure and spider failure
It's..
