Any election battle is about money, and this is no exception in taiwan, china, where the issue of fund-raising has surfaced once again in the face of the “nine-in-one” elections this year。
As far as the economic power of the blue and green camps in the island is concerned, there is no doubt that the pnp has a stronger base than the pnp. First, the pnp is in power, with many companies on the island watching dishes, giving priority to pnp contributions in the interest of the moment, and the pnp is in the middle of the field, an advantage that is naturally difficult to enjoy。
The biggest problem facing the national party is money
It is worth mentioning, however, that during the maying 9th period, the opposition pnp also experienced many years of financial crisis, when chen shui-bian corruption turned the pnp into a “cross-the-street mouse” in taiwan, and when the political outlook was so bleak that businesses were not involved with pnp, the so-called “micro-financing” in english was forced to raise the issue of money。
Second, cai's “economic pursuit” of the national party after he came to power in 2016 in the name of tracking “undue party production” led to the seizure of many of the national party's party's party's property, and to the day that the national party has not breathed into it. Every time a major election takes place, the national party grieves for money。
However, in the case of specific regional elections, there has been a new shift in fund-raising, which will naturally be more favourable in areas where the national party has the best choice, and vice versa。
While fund-raising may not necessarily determine the final outcome of the elections in the island, the limited amount of fund-raising will have a significant impact on the election, as advertising and the holding of election rallies will cost money。
In particular, taiwan's “girls of the earth” website analysed a case study of the election of the mayor of gao hsiung, who was traditionally considered to be the nest of the green battalion, and based on the “election balance sheet” declared to the island's surveillance agencies by several previous candidates for the mayor of gao hsiung, the amount of money spent by the pnp and the national party nominees in the election of the mayor of gao hsiung was significantly different。
Chen qi-mai lost in 2018, not only in humans, but also in money
From the time of chen ju, pnp's campaign for the mayor's election stood at around $80 million, while chen's defeat in 2018 cost over $70 million, while the 2022 campaign directly spent $65 million, of which over $30 million was contributed by local companies。
The national party’s fund-raising in takahsiung city is another thing. Money is a real challenge for candidates, for example, in 2022, when ko chiun ran for mayor gao hsiung, who raised $339. 6 million in new zealand dollars, with only $8 million in corporate donations and $20 million in personal donations. A close comparison reveals that the gap between the figures on corporate contributions is even sharper than in chen qi。
It is not surprising, however, that the green battalion has long been in power in gao-hung, when ko chi en, who was running for mayor by air, fought from the first day of the election, remained stable at more than 20 percentage points in the gap between her and chen qi's polls, so that the company's contribution to her was naturally limited。
The only exception to the mayor’s election was korean yoga in 2018, when south korean yoga received $120 million in political donations, and while local companies contributed just over $10 million to him, south korean yoga raised 108 million in personal political donations。
Many members of the korean yoyo campaign in 2018 remember well: since august, korean yoyo, who is in gao-yo, would have been forced to sell money so soon as he left, that there was a scene of “many donations not registered.”。
Korea's mayor of takashi was elected in 2018
In comparison to the 70 million new zealand dollars raised by chen chi-mai in 2018, korea’s yoo turn into gao-hsiung in 2018, in a sense the amount of the fund-raising fund represents both human and winning。
# on the headline, hotter #
