Apples can be detected, but they usually require back-to-work depth tests. Behind this is a technical battle between black production and apples, while ordinary consumers may be innocent。
Black-born blinding
Black production has evolved from rough to hidden. Early, they replaced the original screen with damaged screens and returned the goods on the ground that they were “unable to turn on”. But the apples were quickly introduced into the ct scan process, the x-ray was followed by a picture of physical damage, which was blocked。
As a result, black production upgraded its tactics by purchasing a properly displayed by-product screen (at a cost of about $300-700) and then transplanting the ic chip on the original screen. The ic chip is like an "identity card" on the screen and contains information like serial numbers. After the transplant, the mobile phone was turned on in a normal and intact manner, and the ios system was still reading the original serial number, so it was not reported to the police。
It is difficult for the front desk of the direct camp to recognize itself on the basis of physical appearance and simple software tests. This operation is extremely covert, making profits up to $1100-1150 (in the case of iphone 17 pro max)。
Apple's "flaming eye."
In the face of this “technology upgrade”, apple's response is to tighten the process and replace on-site verification with a full back-to-work inspection. In apple store, in key cities, the return no longer supports on-site refunds and equipment needs to be returned to the plant for full hardware testing。
Refunds will not commence until the back-to-back inspection covers screens, main panels, tactile ic, internal components, etc., confirming that the equipment has not been scrapped, replaced, tampered with without hardware, and completely out of the plant state. The apples also make it clear that “if the product is dismantled, it can be detected”
While specific technical details are not disclosed in the reference article, in-depth testing allows for the checking of hardware matches and the search for physical traces of dismantling (e. G., waterproofing glue, screw twists, etc.), which cannot be completely concealed by ic transplants. The early black production was replaced with damage screens, which were identified by the ct scan, and now with sub-plant screens, back-to-work testing can also detect anomalies through integrated means。
Who's paying for the leak
The policy adjustment of apples is essentially a leak, but the side effect is that the return experience of ordinary consumers has deteriorated. Previously, the users returned the goods at the camp shop, provided that they were well-dressed and fully equipped, and that they were able to do so on-site, after on-site verification by the shopkeeper, and did not dismantle the aircraft. Now, all returned shipments may have to undergo back-to-work testing and the process becomes cumbersome and time-consuming。
But apples are based on friendly and convenient policies that are based on the integrity of the buyer, but they show these bad traders the so-called `blackouts'。
The black-born act goes beyond the “shell” and is suspected of having committed an offence. Ultimately, the environment of good faith has been compromised and the policy of easing has been tightened, with consumers who shop honestly becoming indirect victims。
So, the answer is clear: apple's back-to-work test can spot the i. C. Transplant switch, but the price is that the return is no longer easy。
