• 291 .. Insight of the art forumOnline languagesAnti-normative phenomena and thinking —DitheringThe language in the review is a good example (gilin teacher college, faculty of arts, jilin changchun 130000): with the development of time and information technology, the internet is becoming the main means of communication. Online language is also part of people's lives. The paper is based on four main aspects, based on the theory of emulation, of the study of the current situation, of the causes of the irregularities in the language of the internet, of the analysis of the language of the voice of the voice and of the rational analysis of the language of the language of the irregularity, and of the phenomenon of the language of the web, for example of the language of the sound of the sound. Keywords: web language; symmetry; shivering; the rapid development of the anti-regulating information age has contributed to the development of networks, which are increasingly becoming the main means of communication, even when people are connected every day. As a web platform that is rapidly evolving and popular in a new era, the web language has its own unique features, the most distinctive of which is the review language. In view of the extensive review of the language, which has been found to be transcribed, abbreviated, semantic, and verbological variation, this paper will explore and think rationally about the web-based language of the nascent platform represented by tremors, from the point of view of tremors, for example. There are three main points of view as to whether web language should be regulated: the first view is to speak purely, and to say so, "the online language destroys the purity of chinese " . From the perspective of linguistic transmission and purity, the author believes that, although language is conventional, the way in which it is in our own hands is that we should make a reasonable agreement and not let it develop, otherwise it will lead to greater negative consequences for future generations. [1] in the web, cultural responsibility cannot be ignored when we express our personal opinions freely. The second view is “normative”, in which scholars believe that cyberlinguistics cannot be allowed to develop and need to be regulated by human beings, but have different views on which language phenomena should be regulated and how. One side believed that there should be tolerance, understanding, facilitation and direction. The status of online languages and their normativeization, as written by kim zhi, states that online languages should be viewed with greater tolerance, in particular by providing them with the necessary guidance to ensure that their construction can be carried out in an orderly manner and ultimately contribute to their prosperity. Zhou hong bo and su xin also share similar views. On the other hand, it was felt that the regulation of web language should be hierarchical. At the root of the web-language overview, it was noted that the regulation of web-languages should be hierarchical and have its own requirements, but in general it was the only measure measured by the degree of availability and communication values, as well as li jian-eun, gangnam and others. The third view is “prematurely speaking”, as clearly stated in chen guang's post-modern reading of “emerging translation” in the web language — the regulation of the web language — that the meaning and legitimacy of the web language are to be seen on the basis of an analysis of the underlying causes of its occurrence, while the right or wrongs of the web language phenomenon are to be examined in time and history. In his view, there is no need and no possibility of regulating online languages. The fact that internet language is not regulated is the reason why internet environments are uniquely open and unique, that everyone is covered by a mysterious veil and that anyone can participate in the network, precisely because the quality of people is not uniform, that there is no real sense of inferiority or inferiority on the network, and that there is no real conflict of interest. There are many internet users who use the network to vent negative emotions, with a negative impact, while at the same time having some impact on language regulation. Network communication is not face-to-face, but spatial and temporal. It also determines the use of different web-based languages for communication, leading to irregular language phenomena. 2. 2 the special reality of the internet community is marked by stress and burden, which allows people to attempt to find a place to vent pressure and a breakthrough in emotional disclosure, a requirement that the internet meets as one of the means of reducing pressure. People are trying to alleviate their internal depression, loneliness and stress in the form of funny and ridiculous language. It is also in this spirit that they have misinterpreted and adapted the internet language at random. 3 the memorization of tremor comment language is 3. 1. The memorization of the memorology is so-called, i. E. Because the genes are the same, so there is some similarity. Understanding at the cultural level and the replication and dissemination of ideas among specific persons. 3. 2 an analysis of the imitation and reproduction of the cause of the failure to describe the model requires the same original language as a copy in terms of form, content, etc. According to the model, at the time of reproduction and dissemination, the language mosaic is mainly expressed in two ways, one in the same form, but with a difference in content, which is a deformation, the other in the same content, but in the same form, which is a genetic type. The internet language is generally the latter. The tremors are short video social software with more than a billion downloads, and there is irregularity in the commentary while spreading positive energy. (1) the content takes different forms. First, a tuning of the sound, in short, is to replace the word with a pronunciation or acoustic. In the language of the shivering comment, such harmony often gives rise to a strange expression that attracts attention and great interest. For example: 555 (wheat, cry), 666 (sliding, strong expression), 7456 (breathing me), 9494 (just as it is), “sweetness” (sleeping), “sweetness” (sweetness), “smoothing” (gay), “smoothing” (smoothing), “good” (all right), “phalian in pharmacies” (push face), “many” (self), “rabbit” (breath), “di” (brothers), and my jio's (i think) words, mainly sounding in chinese, digital and alphabet. It's funny or new. Second, the abbreviations, known as the abbreviations, are reduced to a relatively long term, which eventually leads to the formation of a term, or to the extraction of the initials from a particular article, which constitutes a capital word. For example, dumb whites (persons without a heart), whites (fruits, rookies), opens on their knees, bgms (backround... Music, background music), abbreviations are mostly spoken, rarely written, but some are abstract and difficult to understand. (2) modular shape of the homogeneity. First, semantic variations. Some people in the network do something new to change the original meaning of the word and the emotions, for example, "a red hat, a red hat, a red bag" "a pure pig without you" "a step out of the six-person "i laugh the pig's voice" "suspecting the cat." the above examples, which are deficient in grammatical terms, are mostly expressions of humorous cyberlinguistics that die overnight, so the dissemination of same-sex dissent is also prominent in the network。the expression of words, or their own nature
