Hello, my friends. I'm liu, your master. Focusing on our ordinary people's daily clothing, food, living and everything, sharing practical warnings, prescriptions and pit avoidance techniques with big words, without exaggeration, without anxiety, but with true truth。
In the recent past, there has been a large-scale transmission of information across the internet alleging that on 30 june, a new new regulation on traffic accident compensation will be formally introduced, and that a large number of changes have been introduced. A number of drivers, ordinary people who travel frequently, have transmitted collections, fearing that they will miss out on important travels。
I have long been working in the area of practical legal literacy, and i have always adhered to the principle of rigorous creativity, and i have never been free to pass on any kind of new policy. After a careful review of the existing legal provisions, judicial interpretations and standards of implementation prevailing in different parts of the country, today we have a serious statement to make:
There are currently no new national regulations to harmonize landings on 30 june and to comprehensively adjust the standards for traffic damages. Most of the so-called heavy-heavy changes that are being circulated on the internet are a mixture of old and old rules, routine court practice, local temporary transfer measures, deliberately packaged into fresh hot-spot traffic and misleading a large number of ordinary people。
Today, i leave behind all the traffic jams, i don't make new rules, i don't put together old pieces, i get the facts straight, and i give you the most practical, constant traffic rights-based goods for daily trips, and i help you to avoid cyber-intelligence。
I. Transmitting the truth: the new june of 30 june, what's wrong
First, to clarify the core facts, to help all to understand and avoid continuing to be misdirected。
First, the official judicial interpretation of the proceedings for damages in road traffic accidents that are now in circulation has been refined and fully implemented many years ago, and has been implemented steadily so far, with no new new compensation packages scheduled for centralization at the end of june in recent years。
Second, the most popular so-called new rules that are being circulated online are all well-established rules that have been in place for many years and are not new changes in the near future。
1. The division of responsibility for accidents involving vehicles that are attached to operations, used vehicles that are not in the household, vehicle sets and scrap vehicles is well documented in the current legal interpretation of traffic, which has been applied throughout the world for many years to deal with accidents, without a readjustment at the end of june。
2. The insurance settlement process for accidents caused by the opening of cars and the allocation of liability and liability for the operation of vehicles are also long-term, stable and consistent common sense of compensation and are not new to the recent adjustments。
3. Persons over the retirement age claim the cost of work-wrecking work, the accounting of care costs for family care, the harmonization of standards for urban and rural compensation, and the rationale for determining the primary responsibility for accidents, all of which have long been widely applied to the ground and integrated into the day-to-day incident management。
Thirdly, while it is true that a few areas will be introducing partial hand-over measures in june, such as the optimization of processes at the light-fast, road traffic control, parking management adjustments, etc., such initiatives are limited to local traffic management and have nothing to do with standards of compensation for physical and property damage in traffic accidents, let alone new rules for uniform compensation across the country。
A brief summary: on june 30, a major change in traffic compensation was reported, essentially to tie up old laws and small local policies, to create false rumours of a heavy-heavy atmosphere and not to have the legal force of uniform national application, without excessive anxiety or blind transmission。
Ii. Definitions: the reparation rules have been contexted for years
A lot of friends are attracted to the new rules online because they don't know the basisLegal literacyIt is not clear which criteria have been used for routine accident compensation. And then i'm going to use the big words to sort out the common sense of rights that is valid for long-term stability and that ordinary people have to understand when they go out, and these rules apply at all times。
1. Compensation for work losses no longer restricted by age
Whether they have retired from domestic work, part-time work outside the home, or work as porters, keepers, or casual manual work, they can normally claim compensation for the cost of the accident if they can produce reasonable proof that they have a steady working income on a daily basis. This approach has long been consistent and has not changed over the years。
2. Borrowing of a car, making a mistake or making a mistake
The principle of fixed liability has always been followed by the borrowing of cars between relatives and friends. The principle that the owner of the vehicle is in good condition and in good order, and that the borrower holds a legal licence and is not liable for subsequent accidents, is consistent and consistent only if the owner of the vehicle knows that the vehicle is malfunctioning and that the other party is still borrowing without a permit。
3. Physical compensation has long been harmonized between rural and urban areas
A few years ago, the criteria for calculating compensation for personal injury had been harmonized and no distinction had been made between urban and rural households. The victim's place of permanent residence and actual source of income had been used as the main basis for the determination, and the same level of compensation had been awarded, without discrimination on geographical grounds。
4. Normal settlement of daily reasonable losses
In the case of traffic accidents, the costs of transportation, nutrition during rehabilitation, care for close family care, as well as personal effects such as mobile phones, helmets, clothing, etc., which were directly damaged during the accident, can be claimed in accordance with the law, provided the facts are clear and well documented, which is the long-standing scope of compensation。
5. Legally protected indirect loss of an irresponsible party
No fault of its own was involved in the collision of vehicles on normal journeys, the reasonable costs incurred during the transportation of vehicles to maintenance, and the loss of income from the suspension of legally operated vehicles, which are within the scope of reasonable compensation and do not lead to any loss or loss on the part of the irresponsible party。
Reasonability: two transport-related adjustments that can easily be confused
Many netizens are unable to distinguish between traffic management measures and civil compensation rules, and it is easy to confuse them with one another. Here, the distinction is clear and the difference is understood at once。
The first category is traffic order management. Most of these items are introduced by the local authorities in due course, in accordance with local travel conditions. They include peak deadlines, parking violations, motor vehicle traffic regulations, road pass optimization, and simplified procedures for the rapid handling of minor accidents. Such adjustments would only alter the daily travel restrictions and would not alter any amount of compensation for accidents or items of compensation。
The second category consists of adjustments in the legal category of civil compensation. This type of content is highly hierarchical, the revision process is cumbersome and, once it has been introduced, there will be clear channels of publicity and uniform application, involving core interests such as personal injury, loss of property, insurance claims, etc., and there has been no significant and centralized revision in recent years, and the current standards are sufficiently stable。
You've got the relevant information on a daily basis, and you've got to know what kind of content you belong to before you can easily be misled by false new rules。
Iv. Operational dry goods: ordinary people encounter traffic accidents and the correct processing process remains the same
The most effective way to protect oneself is to keep in mind the static incident management process, as opposed to the false rules of web-based faxing。
First step, priority should be given to the security of the person. First, we evacuate the dangerous driveway to check on the physical condition of the person with whom we work, give priority to medical treatment in case of injury, and always take first place in safety of life。
Step two, complete retention of evidence on site. The scene of the accident was photographed from multiple angles, the location of the collision between the two vehicles, the road profile, the perimeter traffic markings, the preservation of images of the site and the need not to move the vehicle at random to damage the site。
Step three, timely reporting of formal channels. Depending on the preferred approach to the incident, an injured person is called to the police for medical treatment in a timely manner, with only a slight tumble to the point where the parties are not in dispute and can be dealt with in accordance with the local fast-track process。
Step four, secure all documents. The preparation of medical examination reports, medical fee documents, vehicle maintenance bills, travel consumption records and certificates of income earned by workers is the most critical basis for subsequent consultations to settle claims。
Step five, reasonable consultation rejects extreme treatment. The parties consulted amicably and in accordance with the established criteria for compensation, neither demanding high amounts of compensation nor renouncing their legitimate rights and interests easily, and were unable to reach an agreement to deal with it in a formal manner and in accordance with the law。
V. Current course: the survey is always more than all reparation
For so long, i have been convinced that a more refined standard of compensation and a clearer rule of rights defence are only means of redress after an accident has occurred。
While monetary compensation can compensate for economic losses, it can never compensate for physical injuries, time-consuming efforts and the ensuing concerns of families。
Here again, all travelling friends are reminded that driving is a denial of speeding, distraction, fatigue and strict adherence to the rules of road traffic; that riding electric vehicles must be equipped with safety and security equipment, not to reverse, not to break a red light and not to cross the main road at will; and that daily walking is focused on road conditions, far from the large vehicle visual blind zone, creating a good habit of civilized travel and careful travel。
The new rules of travel on the internet, of all kinds, are too numerous to be seen. Rather than spending a lot of time with the wind and anxiety, it is better to keep your own travel safe and to stay away from traffic accidents。
Vi. A rational view of web-based information and a proper sense of identity
Today, short video and social platform information is being disseminated very quickly, and many accounts are being used to capture the flow of information, to create heat by creating a new deal that is fabricated and linked to all kinds of people's lives, and to use the psychological attention of the public to the interests of life。
It should be recalled that, in the future, policy messages relating to electricity, gas, transportation compensation, social maintenance, medical benefits, etc., and everyday life will be drawn up, so as not to believe the transmission in the first place. Priority can be given to the sources of information dissemination, and the heavy new deal issued by informal authoritative channels can be used to maintain a wait-and-see attitude and avoid being influenced by false information。
The major rule-making changes that really affect the rights of the whole population are interpreted through formal government platforms and official channels of livelihood, and do not rely on mass media dissemination。
Interactive exchanges
Have you ever heard of this new traffic code for june 30th? Which kind of travel security do you care about when you go out? What false news have you seen that can mislead the public? You are welcome to share your comments in the comment area and to work together to identify false information on the internet。
Disclaimer
It's about people's livesA rumourWith reference to the day-to-day travel law, all interpretations are based on the laws and regulations relating to transport that are in force for a long time and on the standards of local implementation. This document does not constitute any legal basis for the settlement of disputes arising out of daily traffic accidents, all of which are governed by the findings of the local authorities, the criteria for consultation with insurance agencies and the legal provisions in force, and complex disputes are recommended for the assistance of legal professionals。
