After more than two months, after the market of 20-25 million luxury medium cars compared bmw 3 with the introductory, mercedes-c, and cadillac ct5, i finally got into the 2025 audi a4l 2 million enjoyable 40 tfsi luxurious b&o night editions. Eight months now, 13,000 kilometres away, business receptions, family trips, long distances across the city, and today, in your capacity as real car owners, talk to your friends who have similar needs about how i chose my car, and the real advantages and disadvantages of a4l, to help avoid the wrong car。

The core needs for car selection were clear: brands were transient and able to sustain business; space was practical and allowed for family trips; and power was smooth and the cost of post-care cars was low. By contrast, the combined performance of audi a4l is the most striking -- first, brand recognition, the acceptance of the four axes in business is higher than second-line luxury, and clients are more trusted to come in; and second, the balance of configuration, with more than 21,000 dollars to take down the virtual cabins, reverse images, fast cruises, the functional configuration of the bmw 3 system, mercedes c class entry, which has too much conscience; and second, space and power, with a wide range of 2 908 mm, a full day-to-day movement of 2. 0 t power and an acceptable level of fuel consumption。
Eight months after the lift, the advantages are indeed remarkable. In business receptions, the body line is not too high, the customer feedback is “the audi's specialty”; the car travels well in the city, and communication with the client does not have to increase the volume. When a family travels, the back seat is easy enough for parents to be tired for long enough, and the trunk can easily be filled with baby cars, camping equipment and snacks. The power-neutrality of 2. 0t+7dct is exaggerated, except for a slight setback at a low speed, and the other shifts are smooth, and the speed goes up to 120 km/h, and there's still more to be done, and long-distance travel can significantly reduce fatigue when it starts。

The cost of raising cars is also lower than i expected, with the city fuel consumption of about 7. 5 l/100 km plus gas 95, which is more than $500 a month; the first small maintenance cost 750 dollars, which is much cheaper than i expected, and less stress on later maintenance. Virtual cabins also have a higher-than-anticipated sense of technology, navigation, music interface visualization, voice control responsiveness, less distraction and more secure driving。
However, there are also a number of minor shortcomings that require early psychological preparation. It's a little awkward to have friends sit in the room and say, "this isn't enough for audi." 7 the two-sided low-speed conjunction does exist, with a slight pull at the peak and in the car, which eases the habit, but cannot be completely avoided. High speeds exceeding 110 km/h are visible, affecting intra-car traffic; there is no back-winding, family leaves in the summer, a little heat in the back, pre-cold, some trouble. In addition, the application of motor systems is less ecological and cannot be downloaded too often from third-party apps, and is based on basic navigation and music functions, with the hope that they will be optimized through ota。

Again, the choice of different configuration versions depends entirely on the individual car scene and budget. I chose the 40 tfsi luxurious b& o night version (after a discount of 21. 93 million), which is the most balanced and worthwhile version, with all the practical configurations required for business and household use, and enough brand-modification for most users. If the budget is particularly tight, just want to have the audibine, and two million tfsi styles can be selected (after a discount of 19,270,000), but less image and fast cruises, less practical and less suitable for users with business needs. In the case of northern users, who often encounter ice and snow surfaces, or those who pursue performance, two million tfsi quattro four-way systems can improve stability, but southern users and ordinary household users do not really need to spend more than 20,000 more than that, neither performance nor configuration。
Finally, there are a few practical car-buying stickers: first, to buy a car with as little as possible of the windfall decorations and basic maintenance, saves a lot of later spending; second, to have to add gasoline 95 to ensure engine stability, so that it does not affect the condition of the car in order to save a small amount of money; third, to buy a live charcoal bag or car-car-car-car-load cleaner, which can be effectively mitigated if you feel that the interior-covered taste is too high; fourth, to switch to manual mode when there is a low-speed blockage, which can alleviate frustration; and fifth, to have fewer engine applications, which can compensate for ecological deficiencies with carplay or carlife connections。

When you're choosing a 200,000-grade luxurious medium car, do you give priority to branding, configuration, or internal taste? If it were you, would you choose audi a4l or the other type? The comment section




