São won milk powderSuspected childrenEarly sexThere was an official result. On 15 august, the ministry of health announced that, as a result of a survey, early child sexual intercourse was not related to milk powder。
The tests run by the government are past, but the sacrament of the sacrilegious dollar in the heart of the consumer has grown。
The milk market environment has deteriorated dramatically, as the sanctuary of the sanctuary during the entire hormonal response has been accompanied by a very low-level and foolish response, resulting in a loss of consumer confidence in the chinese milk market environment. Not only is the trouble of the sacrament continuingNational milk powderIt's all fucked up! The s. E. L. Website says "can finish" and it's delusional。
A few days ago i wrote a blog called "the holy episode, heaven or hell." now, the results of the national tests have saved the life of the holy see, which has not been allowed to go to hell, but it is impossible to go to heaven because of a series of inappropriate measures taken by the holy see that have deprived it of a great opportunity to go to heaven. Now, the sacrament cannot live and die. Throughout the process, the sacrament did not show openness, frankness, science, accountability to consumers, nor did it win the most precious hearts and minds. The results of the tests have come out, and the doubts of the consumers have increased。
In its attitude and approach to the hormonal door, the sanctuaries cast doubt on the sanctuary, on the national milk powder and even on the government。
In the face of suspicion, why does the sacrament of the sacramental dollar insist that the product is harmless without national testing? Is that a scientifically responsible attitude? If you are confident, you have to produce your own data, ask a third party to test and dare to match the numbers。
Why has there not been an open and proactive invitation to national authorities to test the product? The bottom line is not enough to be sure that a problem is actually detected? Even the carrots are pulled out of the mud。
In july 2007, the general directorate of quality inspection found that several batches of natural styl (a supplier of milk powder material to the são tomé international group) contained sakazaki coli. In august 2009, the same problem re-emerged, while another batch of powdered milk deteriorated. In march 2008, the tianjin inspection and quarantine service tested multiple batches of de-salinized low-protein powder in euroserum, france. In september 2008, when the crisis of melamine broke out in the country, violations were also detected in products under the saint-martin flag。
If it is not for the outsiders, why do you want to be aggressive against the media? Why not cooperate openly and bring the media to business and follow it all the way?
It is often said that raw materials come from the holy dollar of the european union, and when the media question their origin, the european union is and will be considered only in the past。
Previously, the sacrament was not proactive in demanding public testing. Subsequently, the results announced by the government were said not to be relevant to the sacred dollar, which was immediately welcomed and thanked. If there was a problem with the sacrament, would the sacrilegious sacrament of the government?
Zhang liang and the são tomb remain silent in the são tomb incident, and then a parchment pellet pushes the problem to the government and is even blown out of disgraceful means of conspiring with consumers。
In my country, testing is a mess and, to a certain extent, has helped the sacraments intentionally and inadvertently. The testing unit is confused, the sampling is confused, the testing process is confused and the testing specialist is confused. One thing's clear, one can't send it to another!
The sacrament may steal joy in the face of this system. But this is the big deal that consumers attach great importance to the big deal. How can testing itself be perceived as being public and fair? Why not take the initiative to call for public justice? Is the test qualified to be published and the data modified to be tested for non-compliance?
The stags hurt the liquid milk of the country, the consumers cannot drink the liquid milk of europe; this time, the sundae kills the milk of the country, and the parents will not kill their children. The sanctuary helps parents with limited incomes break their last illusions, and national milk powder can't drink anything!
It's too passive, too bad, lost the opportunity to be a big, respected enterprise and to take the lead in leading the industry up!
In the face of the crisis, when the national focus was on the holy dollar, the holy episode did not take on the responsibilities and responsibilities of a well-known enterprise, lost the dignity and self-confidence of a large brand, and thus could not take the lead and lead the whole industry in raising its responsibility, nor did it take the initiative to work with the national authorities to improve the testing system. On the contrary, the holy episcopalism is like an active suspect, and all efforts are to clarify themselves。
The failure and negligence of the leading companies in the face of the great britain and northern ireland have resulted in the loss of their own market value of more than rmb 2 billion and, more importantly, the disappointingness of the entire industry。
It's not about milk powder. It's a good thing that são paulo decided to donate rmb 10 million to set up a special fund for “sex precious childhood”, but it's too late to save the são paulo brand. How can a firm that saves its own business now win consumer confidence?
