Hey, look what happened. The shark's skin door in the swimming world is blowing up again! Our flying fish phelps was asked about his amazing shark skin swimsuit. When he mentioned it, it was like eating a fly。
You're saying that this american captain has been in the pool for years, has taken 23 olympic gold medals and has been stuck in a bathing suit? But by the way, it's not just a swimsuit. It's a high-tech thing. It was said to have been custom-made for phelps, and to have it worn so that it would run across the water like a shark, it would have been a dead end。
But god forbid! When phelps mist thought he was an invincible swimming platform, he suddenly killed a young chinese boy, pang. The little brother pan dumped phelps behind him in a costume. 100 meters free to swim, phelps 47 seconds 51, pan xerox 45 seconds 92, exactly one second 59! So, phelps is a pain in the ass。
Phelps, this is embarrassing. That was another time. "come on, man, you're throwing a pot!" "don't say my shark skin is bad," "my 23 medals have nothing to do with this." well, what's that supposed to sound like
But by the way, this shark skin swimsuit does have something. Designed to imitate shark skin, it is said to reduce current friction and increase speed. This thing helped phelps kill all fours at the 2008 beijing olympics. Eight gold medals. If there's something wrong with the u. S. U., what kind of business is that。
It's a mess. The swimming world is fried. Some say phelps wins by equipment, others say it is a manifestation of technological progress. But anyway, it's hard not to remember the old saying: mules and horses, pull out。
To be honest, phelps is indeed a swimming genius, and there's no doubt about it. But how fast can he swim without this costume? I'm afraid only god knows. But then again, the performance of pan chau has revealed to us that technology is important, but human potential is infinite。
It is also a matter of thinking about how to balance the science and the human factor in sport in this era of rapid technological development. Shouldn't all athletes be wearing armor to see whose equipment is better? Or should we go back to being real
At the end of the day, isn't the spirit of sport a level playing field, beyond self? What's the point of a bathing suit? Besides, if phelps was to wear shark skins and pan's funky, wouldn't that be funny
But then again, it's interesting. Think about it. Wouldn't it be cool if we could go swimming at sea and swim like sharks? However, it is estimated that prices are not cheap and may have to sell kidneys to be affordable。
In general, we have a lesson from the sharkskin incident: whether in the pool or on the course of life, the real victory is not in what you wear as a "suit of war" but in how you use your potential. Phelps and pan are great athletes whose achievements should not be defined by a bathing suit。
Finally, let's think about what kind of a world would be if, one day, technology developed so that ordinary people could move in the water like fish. Perhaps then we will not have to argue about who is fast and who is slow, but will really enjoy swimming. After all, life is like swimming, not speed, but whether you enjoy every moment of it。
