A paper-based bulletin opened up a position that many people thought were “stable”。
On 5 june 2026, the national monitoring board website of the central disciplinary commission and the monitoring board of the regional disciplinary commission of guizhou jointly informed:Liannan stateMembers of the npcsc party group, deputy director zhu binji, suspected of serious disciplinary offences, are under disciplinary and supervisory investigation。
A lot of people are staring at the position of “deputy state chief”, but i think the more secure part is on the other side: he's not the first young cadre and he's not the new face. He was born in march 1969, a quizhou qiang, joined the workforce in august 1991 and joined the party in december 1996, and has been at the grass-roots and state levels for many years. In particular, in the sandu aquarium autonomous district, he was not a hasty visitor, but a man who had been in power for almost seven years。
It's the easiest thing to screw. It's right here。
A cadre who hasn't done anything, he's been investigated, and he's gone. But that was not the case of zhu bizun. From the beginning of the city, he served on the standing committee of the equal city council, the deputy permanent mayor, and later on at the organizational department of the commission, the state civil administration, and at the end of 2017, he was officially elected secretary of the sandu aquator autonomous district in october 2021. In february 2022, he was elected deputy director of the standing committee of the state people's congress at a meeting of 15 seniors of the state of luang nam, and became a deputy management officer. Since then, he has served as deputy director of the standing committee of the cantonal people's congress and as secretary of the sandu district council, who did not leave office until around the end of 2024。
In other words, he was not “released for a long time and suddenly turned over”, but was informed of his departure for about a year and a half。
It is hard not to think of one step at a time: are there some questions that come later or are buried long ago
Of course, the findings were not available and could not be concluded for the commission. But why would ordinary people be particularly sensitive to this kind of thing, to be honest, is not because of the insatiableness of the rise and down, but because this place is so specific。
Three are the only aquatic autonomous districts in the country, with a minority population of more than 95 per cent, with a thin base and mountains and difficult to develop. When zhu bong has gone, this is the most intense phase of the fight against poverty. In 2020, all three withdrew from the poverty district sequence one year ahead of schedule, and the third party assessed their performance as “zero understatement, zero misevaluation, zero error”. These are the results that are visible. That year, he also took a team to yunnan for a business tour to find a way out of the industry。
That's why it's hard to finish。
If a person has nothing to accomplish, there are only problems, then the judgment is simple. It is difficult now, and it is because of what he did in office that he did something he could see, and it is because of it that this post-notice will be boring. The most uncomfortable thing for many people is not “he didn't have the skills”, but “the people who did the things that he did, or who might have problems elsewhere”。
Can't you make a difference? This is probably the point of disagreement that many people will have when they first react。
One would say that a hard job like poverty can never be wiped out. It will also be said that the more the project, the funds and the cadres are in charge of these key powers, the less they will be able to use the word “work” as a shield. In particular, in a once-deeply poor district, roads, bridges, dangerous housing improvements, industrial support and educational support are not on paper figures, and for many families, hope is a step forward。
That's the problem. People look at the cadre, not with a magnifying glass, but at the end of your career。
In one place, hats were removed, followed by not only applause, but also sustained investment in rural revitalization, infrastructure and industrial development. The number of projects, the amount of funds, the approval, allocation and promotion of each of them is a test. What is truly disturbing is that it is never someone's position, but if there is a problem with this place, this stage, this most prudent node of power, it is often not the abstract public interest, but the most specific, unimpaired ordinary person。
This is also why there is always another kind of inquiry: if the problem of infractions had long existed, had he been sifted out when he was elected deputy director of the standing committee of the state people's congress in 2022
This is not an excuse for the parties; rather, it is. A man has a problem, of course. But many people are staring at “no signs before being promoted” because it is clear to all that the costs are often incurred simply by aftercare. It's not just one person's future, it's the public's choiceTrustI don't know。
That's what's getting worse。
Rather than “how could something happen to him”, it is “why does it always happen that it is after something happens that everyone finds out that something is wrong with him”. It's not just one person's luck, it's probably when the whole set is sensitive。
In other words, what is most important now is the de facto boundary. The circular merely states that serious disciplinary offences are suspected and are under disciplinary review and inspection, what the specific issues are, at what stage they take place, what matters are involved and follow-up information is required. He cannot be replaced, nor can he write conclusions for the investigating authorities。
But one thing is that many people already have a judgment: the more special the position, the less they can offset the rule by “doing what they have done”; and the harder a place, the harder it is to fail on key money and projects。
Some of the books, not in the forms。
Particularly in places like the three, the people remember that year, perhaps not the document, the meeting, but who said what and did what at the most difficult time. They are willing to believe that it is more important than anything that the day is difficult and that it captures a solid core. But once this “dominant heart” is found to have its own problems, the loss is not simply a “waiting finding” that can be digested。
In the end, it was not one of the 57-year-old cadres who had been retired for three years but was suddenly investigated, nor was the line between the county secretary and the deputy director of the standing committee of the state people’s congress broken。
It's another sentence: trust in a place that's hard to build is too expensive。
It's slower than promotion. It's easier than notification. It's going to take years to build, and it's going to collapse in a second。
