A lot of people thinkGeneralIt's just a regular journal. It's all the same. It's all available. It's not true at all. There's a huge difference between the average and the average。
There's a popular magazineEvaluation titleThere was a high degree of accreditation and a high number of points; in some cases, general publications were issued in the form of white hair, which was not accepted at all。
Today, as editor of a senior journal, we will be able to explain to you, in one instance, the grade, the difference, what works and what does not, and never again。
First of all, we often refer to generic academic journals, divided into provincial and national periodicals, which are not part of the core categories of the north, cssci, science and technology。
However, within the universal publication, there are also 369 classes, not all of which can be used for job titles。
Category i, highest grade, highest level of accreditation and most conservative rating:Online intakeThe quality of the popular magazine。
This type of journal is the first in the popular publication, is accessible only to the internet and is regularly recorded on the first page of the website, with influence factors, compound factors, strict copy clearance, high quality and good reputation。
Virtually all units and institutions of higher education have a 100 per cent recognition of their titles, which is very high, in some cases, and even in the case of high-quality popular publications, as the equivalent of the normal core。
It is characterized by relatively strict audits, high repetition rates, a general requirement of less than 20 per cent, relatively high layout costs, but a sound publication, an absolutely good rating and no pedaling。
The second category, which is medium-acceptance, has the highest value for money: know-your-network, all-powerful, and the regular popular edition of the whip。
Such periodicals are the most common, most author-selected generic, regularly recorded in the three main mainstream databases, accessible by the press and publications agency, with a formal double number, quality and academic discipline。
The vast majority of institutions of higher learning, career qualifications and graduate studies recognize such periodicals and fully meet basic requirements。
It is characterized by moderate auditing, a repetition rate of less than 30 per cent, high recruitment rates, fast drafts, moderate prices, and sound ratings, which are the preferred choice of the majority。
The third category, low-level, generic, partial non-acceptance: universal, universal and non-existent。
Such periodicals, which are also formally registered, have double numbers, but are available only in the thousands or in the web。
In many establishments, institutions of higher learning, the title of the post is not recognized, except for periodicals received on the internet. In particular, undergraduate schools and major urban enterprises are essentially the only publications on the cognitive web。
If you send a journal of this type, the final unit will not approve it, and it will be completely white。
It is therefore important that you look at the unit's request and clearly approve which database and not publish it。
The fourth category is extremely poor quality and poorly qualified: garbage water, electronic periodicals。
Such periodicals, although documented, are very confusing in their collection, receiving all their articles, and being audited in a false manner, with extremely low quality and poor reputation, many of which are blacklisted。
Most of the evaluation titles do not recognize such publications, even if they are not explicitly blacked out, and the judges see them, which directly lowers their impressions, to the detriment of your evaluation。
In category v, there is absolutely no possibility of issuing or evaluating the title of the post, which is null and void: fake, package, supplements, supplements, collections of papers。
This type of non-formal popular publication, which has been stressed on many occasions, is not recognized as such, and there may be a risk of academic misconduct, which must be avoided with determination。
I'm going to tell you how to judge whether a popular magazine works or not:
1. Access to the internet is the core criterion. (a) access to the internet is much higher than that of the tens of thousands of users
2. The reading and examination of drafts is not rigorous. A good popular journal that reviews the quality, logic, innovation of the papers, not just the money
3. Read the impact factors of periodicals. Net collections, compound factors and impact factors are good quality and good quality publications
4. Read the journal slogan. Is there a water magazine that's been pulled black by the unit, and that's what's been thrown down all year
5. Read the issue. Weekly, revue, larger and more watery; monthly, bimonthly, more stable。
I'll give you one of the most practical suggestions:
The award, which is published in a universal form, gives priority to internet collections, regular double titles and periodicals of stable quality, and is approved 100 per cent on a secure basis。
Do not pass a final rating for the sake of saving money, making a good distribution, issuing a poor quality publication。
