South wind
From 10 to 11 november, i was discussing it with class two of the campCurrent affairs reviewsPlanning and writing. It was a very interesting event for academic and industry exchanges, a combination of theory and practice. In my discussions with you, i found that students have a good basis for their current sensitivity, their choice of subject and their basic work in writing, but there are still a few issues that are generally confusing and where they share their personal views, in the hope that they will be inspired。
I. What is a current matter? Focus on “time”
The current-life review, by definition, is a review of the hot news in the current society, which focuses on “time”, that isTime limitsI don't know. For example, some of the students focused on the hotspot of the people's café, which was debated at the legal level; others criticized the phenomenon of the “health card shopping” and the “web abuse of young people”; others focused on the recent games in guangzhou; and others on the development of special agricultural products in the context of rural renewal. As we can see from these selections, the time-bound nature of the current review, the “hotness”, has been highlighted in both recent days and periods, with a longer-term focus. In other words, as long as people are particularly concerned and concerned, it is hot spots, and it is time-bound, it can be the subject of current reviews. Of course, we would also like to stress that a hot news time or a news phenomenon must be universal and public in order to be the object of comment. Otherwise, a hotter event or example cannot be the subject of current events — it is of little value。
Ii. The perspective of current affairs reviews should be focused and refined hiro
Many of our fellow students, in drawing up their perspective on the comments, liked to set out a broad framework, like a paper, listing one, two, three, four points for the comments. It is thus too broad to speak in general terms at every point, without being able to speak in depth, to speak out and instead lose the value of commentary. In fact, the focus of current-life reviews is on one thing, and as long as the core issues of news events, or points of contention, are drawn out, it is good to have a layer of analysis, like onions, of the core issues, social impacts, causes, and solutions. After all, a comment of about 1,000 words could clarify events, and it would be difficult to argue strongly. When it comes to everything, it's usually just everything, but nothing。
Iii. Commental languages with points and points
Some of them are confused about the difference between news reviews and news reports, and often are written in a multiplicity of cases, lacking analysis, refining and summarizing. It was a pity that arguments had been given, but could not be put at the service of the point of view. Thus, in our commentary, we need to focus both on the arguments and on the selection of cases, and more on how to translate these cases into our own views through our own analysis, especially with regard to language processing, with a focus on clear positions and attitudes in order to be more clear and powerful in reaching and influencing audiences. Otherwise, comments without position and attitude are like a food that doesn't have enough cooking to eat. But often a single sentence or two makes the whole article look good and good。
