I'm sorry, but i want to spray anonymous users this time

I knowIt's been shelled again。

The founder of the network, huang yinpu, wrote an open letter to the founders of the network, which he couldn't bear because of his anger over the "faceless" slander。

What kind of anonymous slander

Some of the questions that have been raised over the years are similar to the question “do you think huang yinchu will be able to roll up money?” there are some questions that say that he has emptyed his investors and spent money on new york university business college, often from anonymous users, and that the source of information is “allegedly”。

Slide up

Huang yingpu, with his own advice, tried to communicate with zhou xian xianxi, and as a result he did not reply。

As a result, huang sent this open letter declaring war on an "anonymous mechanism"。

It is not just a mouth-to-mouth, but it's already started with the middle-to-mouth, and huang says he's going to go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about the question of whether zhou zheng is stupid or not, asking anonymously for answers, and reporting to the national political consultative council about zhou zhou’s creation。

It is known that there has been a response: there are well-known mechanisms of community governance against the fabrication of false information, malicious defamation of others, etc. Users are welcome to provide feedback through the "reporting" channel, and the platform will verify and process it first。

But it didn't come to an end with a response, and in addition to the big deal, there were a lot of internet users in the comment section who really talked about the "faceless mechanism."。

There were many comments from the critics, and one of the netizens even directly said that the strict regime of anonymity, as huang yingpu put it, was not answered and no one made it up。

It's inappropriate to look at it as pure, to ignore the fact that it's true, but on the other hand, there's probably a lot of people who feel that a lot of interesting questions and answers do come from "unnamed users."。

"what's the most embarrassing thing you've ever experienced?" with this problem, everyone dares to throw out their most embarrassing and festivities because of their vests。

And not just ordinary people, "what's it like to be a star," but there's a lot of anonymous stars, like the english from early weibo, who say "real."。

In addition to this, there is a direct demonstration of the dark side of humanity。

Once these people are wearing their vests, they don't care about anything. They fall out, and some of the respondents even feel the pleasure of being released。

In reality, even in the world of the internet, these are things that are absolutely invisible in the day, and in a sense, "anonymous users" have become a distinct "situation line" on the internet, by virtue of which people refuse to perform, and to reveal their secrets。

What's the difference between these answers

I'm sorry, nobody cares, it's hard to verify。

And that's what makes "hidden" a lot of fascinating answers, but it's becomeFictionThe soil。

Because it takes one mouth to make it up, to say nothing, to make a joke, and you don't even know if it's his idea to go to the bathroom at night。

If it is a fabrication, it does not affect anyone, but there are questions about attacks against prominent individuals, and some answers fool the public and have a huge social impact。

18. 8 million bride price, remember

The 18. 8 million-dollar bride price was the work of an anonymous user who was later investigated and found to have been fabricated, and because of the incident, it was almost sifting。

To judge the judge, "unnamed" is itself a game of fire, and it helps communities harvest huge traffic and interesting content in the early days, but if it doesn't work, it's sooner or later。

Knowing that just waiting for this day。

Why do you say that

I don't know if anyone has noticed that anonymous social software has erupted in the early years, and in the saturation of social markets, it is called the future of social software, but these years, the "future" are almost dead。

A series of anonymous social apps, such as the “unhidden” service in the country, “toast”, “words”, “packet mt”, “popi question box” and others, all end up the same。

The same goes for those abroad。

In 2014, almost half of silicon valley people were playing an anonymous social software called secret。

This is an anonymous social software based on acquaintances, which was launched 45 days ago with $8. 6 million in financing, which was first on the download list of applications stores in eight countries, but it took only nine months from first in the ranking to stop operating。

Although the software is red with all the secrets of silicon valley, in fact, time’s journalists have come to the conclusion that these secrets are generally of several kinds:

The secrets of technology companies

The technology company scandal

Insulting a few of silicon valley personalities or companies they run

Complaints against all types of enterprises in silicon valley

Secret software itself

I don't know.

Does it look familiar

While anonymous information, by virtue of its real nature and privacy, attracts the eye and once drives anonymous software towards social rankings to download top1, why does anonymous software fail to sustain its advantage and quickly collapse

We might as well do an experiment。

The following two messages, which one do you think will spread more

1 he's been in love with his girlfriend for years and is recently getting married。

2 he had been in love with his girlfriend for many years and had recently been planning to get married, but his girlfriend had suggested that, in accordance with the customs of his home country, he needed an 18. 8 million bride price。

In theory, negative, poaching, gossiping and strange things are much more contagious than the debris that is everywhere in normal life。

When you can speak freely, it's a lie, slander, and sexual harassment. It's an "anonymous user," it's not about you on the internet, it doesn't affect reality。

There is no sense of responsibility in speaking, and it is inevitable that someone will magnify the evil inside。

In a classic case, a student at the lincoln branch of the university of nebraska posted on the anonymous software yek yak that he had planted a second bomb in the office of the principal。

Of course, the police didn't find anything. The student told them that he was just kidding and thinking about eyeballs。

Some u. S. High school students used yikyak as a pit of shit, where they attacked a fellow student by name with bitterness and hatred。

Since rumours and defamation can be amplified by anonymity, is it possible to filter them

At one time, secret created a team of 90 full-time owners, but it did not solve the problem。

So, for these masters to play anonymous apps, no matter how brilliant at first, they tend to lead inevitably to the end of the pit。

The small platforms are not yet secure, and this function is even more dangerous for large platforms covering hundreds of millions of users。

When qqc goes online, you'll find that if you have the weapon to speak anonymously, you can get a lot of moths out of your normally peaceful class。

In previous years, a student was asked to attend training by a counsellor at the fatty college, which resulted in an anonymous expression of the face of the student, who said that he wanted to make a joke, but the counsellor went off and said that he had contacted headquarters to find out who。

This was followed by the posting of images on the internet, which triggered a public outpouring of opinion and a large number of unknown netizens attacked the academy together。

Slide up

The now widely known "mysterious organization" momo army, too, could lead to danger。

Momo, fully known as "the dragon momo", belongs to the micro-intelligent genesis package ip series. When the user has a micro-intelligence to log in to other software, the momo will be defaulted to id and the pink little dinosaur will be the initial header (or possibly a nerve frog or white)。

At first it was a bunch of people who didn't want to change their faces。

In recent years, however, the internet environment has become increasingly angry。

Many have volunteered to join the mo army to gain a kind of psychological protection by hiding themselves in the collective, and as more and more people have taken the initiative to become momo, momo is essentially an anonymous group of people。

It is true that most people have no bad intentions for fun and privacy。

But for a small number of people, this skin means that in the comment section, a mo does everything。

These events also reminded the jury of a psychological experiment that had been conducted by the psychologist kimbard, who had targeted female university students, and had made the women students involved in the experiment punish those who had made mistakes。

The women students were divided into two groups, one with their names on their chests and the other with their heads covered and their faces invisible. After being dressed as the wrong person by the staff member, the psychologist asked the female university students who had participated in the experiment to give instructions to punish the wrong person by electric shocks。

The result of the experiment was that the group of people with their heads covered up, and those with electric shocks, for longer periods of time。

No one is sure whether the distribution will be good or cruel when the name is erased from the internet。

We have always believed that people understand one another as the internet develops. But now, it appears that there are many internet by-products that are moving toward unexpected routes。

I am confident that more of the future platform's efforts can remove the fierce malice behind anonymity。

But at the moment, the gap between people has not been filled. In most cases, true identities give real responsibility, while false carnivals cannot be grasped。