To ensure that goods are sourced, transported exclusively, and secured for a month. From march 2022, over a year, 67Truck driverAttracted by ads like this, fell inFraudThe team's well-designed “routing” trap accumulated over $2. 3 million。
In recent days, the first case in the country of “routing” in the area of trans-vans and metro-cars, which was prosecuted for fraud, was finally decided by the cheng city intermediate people's court, which upheld the first instance judgement, with three principals serving sentences of 11 years and 6 months, 10 years and 5 years, and six accomplices serving sentences of 6 years and suspended sentences of 1 to 3 years。
“roading” is a complex fraudulent technique targeting truck drivers and internet drivers, which occurs in many cities throughout the country。
Nine individuals involved in the sentencing of the “routing” fraud, through the establishment of a shell logistics company, posted “one million monthly” on the recruitment websiteFalse advertisingAttracting job-seeking drivers to use “corporate guarantees for the purchase of vehicles” as an incentive to purchase designated vehicles at a high price and to profit illegally by way of misrepresentation of the cost of the vehicles and the use of poor information and fees。
Such routes, which range from recruitment, sales, loans to transport operations, appear to be legally compliant and often disguised as “economic disputes”, are difficult for public security authorities to initiate investigations. But this time, it's different。
Since 2023, 12 departments, such as the provincial department of transport and communications, have been engaged in a three-year chain-wide approach, focusing on business access, car shopping, production and the fight against illegal crime, with provincial governors addressing 1,046 claims related to priority “routing” and 219 companies. The department of public security, the public prosecutor's office, the courts and the ministry of transport at the provincial and district levels have worked closely together to combat the criminal offences of “road-set” and have eventually led to the conclusion of the case of “road-set” in the capital district。
The core of the “routing” cases in the twilight mansion district is shown in 3 links and 12 “pits” where a large number of drivers are requested not to step on the pits。
Number one, recruitment
Pipe 1, publish false job advertisements. The outlaws set up shell logistics companies, posted false job advertisements such as “securing the source of goods, dedicated transport, and well-paid” on the recruitment website, and lured victims to the logistics company for employment by means of active microblogging, telephone solicitations, etc。
Pipe 2, cheat on intent. During interviews with victims, the fictional company has long-term cooperation with large local enterprises and factories, ensuring a live and monthly intake to attract victims to the job, from which it has fraudulently obtained an offer of employment ranging from $400 to $10,000。
Second, loan for car purchase
Pipe 3, seduction to buy a loan. In the case of uncar-less job-seekers, a false guarantee for the purchase of a car for the shipment of goods can be used as a bait to induce the victim to enter into a contract for the commissioning of a car purchase。
Pipe 4, loan to designated institutions. Victims are required to make loans to designated financial lending institutions。
Pipe 5, designated agencies buy cars. The victim was required to purchase the specified van at the designated truck sales company。
Pipe 6, cheat the difference. The difference between $2500 and $54,000 was fraudulently obtained by concealing the real price of the car。
Pipe 7, deceiving other costs. After the financial lending institutions had fully paid the vehicle price, insurance premiums, etc., and the auto sales company had registered the vehicles, they continued to take down down the down payment and insurance premiums for vehicles ranging from $1,000 to $3,000 on the grounds that the loans were insufficient and insurance costs were not paid。
Pipe 8, false promises of property rights. The victim was promised to drive for the company, which could arrange for other drivers to take over if it was not operating well, while hiding the “sets”。
Third, transport operations
Pipe 9, contract for a “setaway”. The contracts entered into for the operation of trucking services are vague or manifestly unfavourable to the victims, such as management fees, the length of service, household transfer fees and documents, terms of default and default money. For example, when 28 days of transport are scheduled per month, which does not seem to be the norm, “sets” are hidden。
Pit 10, continuous "sweety wool". Under the “set-a-way” contract, vehicles were prevented from moving and operating under normal conditions by means of “delayed, withheld documents, forced collections” and were charged high management fees, insurance premiums or liquidated damages。
Pipe 11, “set-a-way” driver defaulted. By effectively not sending a single or long-distance transport order, which prevented the driver from reaching the agreed transport time, was not profitable and was not available, the victim was deliberately prevented from completing the 28-day transport mission per month, and the “set” driver himself filed a breach。
Pipe 12, shift risk. As the victims did not meet expectations, they offered to return the vehicles, and the company would arrange for additional drivers to take over, lead the parties to enter into a transfer-of-title agreement, and explicitly take over the drivers to repay the loans. However, at a later stage, the chauffeur who took over was no longer repayable on time, the victims were unable to contact the company and take over the driver, were heavily indebted and some of the victims ' vehicles were unaccounted for。
The transport sector reminds a large number of its friends that prior to the purchase of vehicles, it was found that there was a risk of “sets” requiring the purchase of vehicles by a designated vehicle sales firm, the operation of a designated business or platform, and that, in particular, a number of recruitment websites committed to the recruitment of drivers to $20,000-$30,000 per month, which would certainly be “sets” and not to believe that “cakes” would fall from the sky; when contracts were entered into, there could be “sets” where management fees, service periods, transaction costs, default money, etc. Were vague or clearly unfavourable to drivers. In the event of a “set”, a telephone call can be made to “12345, 12328” or to the public security authorities。
