Tangshan
"i have an internal connection, and the project has been packaged in a steady and almost 100% pass rate." this is an oral commitment made by some intermediaries to university students applying for a business start-up subsidy. At present, the lump-sum entrepreneurship subsidy rate varies from several thousand to tens of thousands, and in some places there is a specific policy of funding university start-ups. According to the workers' daily, the money was targeted by intermediaries: some were charged for services and high-cost deductions under the name of “opportunity application” and others were even compensated for by the establishment of a handbag company and the purchase of services to impersonate results, creating a grey chain of industry。
The entrepreneurship subsidy, a policy support fund established by the government to encourage and support university graduates to start their own businesses, helps to lower the threshold for university students to start their own businesses, relieves the financial pressure on start-ups, helps to encourage, guide, guarantee the personal development of university graduates and promotes social progress, which is clearPublic servicesProperties, known as “water for the public good”. However, the fact that an intermediary has allowed this “public good” to slip through a “transit” of “transit” into the middleman's “private field” has led to a significant deterioration in the functioning of public services, contrary to the original policy intent。
The fact that intermediaries use poor or artificially poor information makes it difficult for university graduates to see the “no-deposit” alert of government departments and the procedural guidance for applying for entrepreneurship subsidies, deliberately creating two illusions: first, that the process of applying for entrepreneurship subsidies is more complex and difficult, and second, that intermediaries work with government departments, where “inner people” are so powerful that they can easily resolve problems in the process. Under these two false pretences, some university graduates chose to “cooperate” with the intermediary, some of whom even became the intermediary's illegal collaborator, intentionally or not, on the vessel of the broker。
The middlemen's subsidy for university student start-ups is based on a number of options, the simplest of which is to charge a certain percentage of the business start-up subsidy for intermediary services and for substitute services; the progressive chain is to induce university students to enter their designated writing buildings, recommend additional services such as proxy bookkeeping, registration of software copyright, etc., which are much higher than the market price. Under the intermediary's chain of “helps”, university graduates are subject to a chain of harvests and business start-up subsidies are subject to a chain of interception. The worst and most serious is the use by intermediaries of fake start-up projects by hand-bag companies, in conjunction with university-level entrepreneurs, in order to impersonate, fraudulently collect entrepreneurship subsidies and talent subsidies。
These paths of intermediaries undoubtedly touch the bottom line of policy and law. Student entrepreneurship subsidies and employment subsidies should be used 100 per cent to support university graduates in starting their own jobs, and intermediaries should eat a large amount of money and let the subsidies shrink. Even if entrepreneurship is real, even if an intermediary does provide some sort of proxy service, it would constitute a malicious crowding out of public services, undermining the effectiveness of public policy, contrary to public order, and should be legally invalid. In response, a number of judicial cases have been clearly characterized and alarm bells have been sounded for undesirable intermediaries。
An intermediary and a university graduate “entrepreneur” who conspires to take advantage of various subsidies and, if the threshold is met, is guilty of fraud. Students involved in the scheme may be simply “cooperative signatures”, but if they know or ought to know that the business project in question is false and that the material requested is false, they are also liable for a joint offence。
Undergraduate entrepreneurship subsidies, which are earmarked for policy purposes, must be earmarked and used for real purposes, and must be zero-tolerance for any enterprise, organization or individual “stopping” of entrepreneurship subsidies and fraud of entrepreneurship subsidies. The authorities such as the human welfare, finance, public security, and the courts should further improve the rules governing the granting of business subsidies to university students in response to the confusion of middlemen with various titles and paths, strengthen supervision and supervision of the receipt and destination of subsidy funds, allow for the transparent operation of subsidized funds, and ensure that subsidies are used for real business and real business through monitoring and monitoring of business projects, subsidy funds and the whole process。
The application for the use of a negative list of business start-up subsidies should be drawn up, and it should be made an offence for intermediaries to eat “tang monks” of business start-up subsidies in the name of the costs of acting services, high withdrawals, designated additional services, etc., and prohibited by law. At the same time, attempts to impersonate intermediaries or “entrepreneurs” or to defraud them of entrepreneurship subsidies and talent subsidies have been severely combated, criminal liability has been pursued and typical cases have been brought to light, releasing the disciplinary and deterrent effect of governance. A typical case warning should be given that graduates of educational universities are free from deception and vice-brokering, and that if a fraud has been committed, the proceeds of fraud must be returned in a timely manner in order to obtain a light penalty or exemption。
It is also important for the relevant sectors to simplify the process of obtaining entrepreneurship subsidies, reduce the threshold and difficulty of applying for entrepreneurship subsidies and provide better guidance on how to make the process widely known and increase policy awareness and accessibility through multiple channels. It is only through a combination of containment and better integrated management that the public good of student entrepreneurship subsidies can be ensured that they do not flow to “private fields”。
