On the night of november 19, when xinhua news agency (journalist feng tai peng yang jing) waited for two months, the anyang “dog bite” incident finally settled and the dog owner went to the injured old man's home to apologize。
It's a simple civil dispute, why do you ferment to the heart of the web? The fact that xinhua journalists went to anyang, henan, and conducted a field mission revealed several sectoral failures and the failure to put in place mechanisms for the resolution of disputes has led to minor problems。
Q: how hard is it to admit a dog bites
Sub-district surveillance videos provided by the property show that two black high-sized vip dogs fell on elderly people on narrow sub-district roads and broke free from the old ones. The photographs provided by the family of ms. Guang, who was injured, showed that the elderly had been injured in the back and that there were signs of bites in the waist。
Ms. Guang's daughter-in-law wang fong stated that she had been bitten and filmed by surveillance, and that the owner of the dog had not acknowledged that the old man had fallen and had been forced to confess until after widespread social attention。
The journalist met with the injured elderly in the community of jinhua, anyang city, who had been vaccinated and was still weak and in need of family support。
Q: is it really a counseling dog
In interviews with journalists, it became clear that two of the dogs in the incident were black vip dogs, with 64 centimetres above their shoulders, one registered under the name of lee xiaobai, who held the dog at the time of the incident, and the other under the name of his daughter wang。
According to the head of the office of special governance of the city administration of anyang, guo's army said that although the two vip dogs belonged to the large dogs, the person concerned stated that they were used for psychological support and that they were special work dogs who could be issued with documents. “... When registration of the dog certificate is processed, the owner of the dog is required to provide an identity card, an immunisation certificate for the dog, a registration certificate for the dog issued by the chinese association for the management of working dogs, and a commitment to a civilized dog is completed.”
Ms. Guernsey's family indicated that wang was in need of psychological counselling and that the two dogs were not psychological help dogs and were able to obtain a dog certificate, and looked forward to the precise conclusions of the official in-depth investigation。
Three questions: why are public officials still lying to the truth
On 20 september, at 1300 hours, li xiaobai was informed that after the incident in which the dog had been injured, she had taken medicines such as iodine from her home to wipe out ms. Guang, and that he had been informed by telephone that wang had taken ms. Guang to the vaccination station with her car. When wang xin arrived on the scene, communication with ms. Guang's family was unsuccessful, resulting in verbal clashes. Subsequently, ms. Geng and her family took their own vaccinations。
Wang fong stated that she and her family were disappointed by the fact that wang xin had just become a public official and had refused to acknowledge, apologize and ignore the civilian police investigation。
According to the investigation, the inspector of food medicines at the level of the integrated administrative enforcement unit for the supervision of the markets of anyang city, wang xinxiang, was the inspector. Following the incident, the team leader spoke to wang xingang himself on several occasions to criticize him and educate him on the timely resolution of the dispute。
Question four: why is it taking so long
After her injuries, ms. Guang's family took a series of measures to defend her rights by calling a 110-call call to the community residents ' committee of china luo-thai, the city board of the main department responsible for dog-keeping in the city, the public security department of anyang city, the integrated administrative enforcement unit for the monitoring of the markets of anyang city, the letter visiting board of anyang city, the monitoring board of the disciplinary commission of anyang city, and to henan television. In the interest of legal defence, ms. Guernsey's family also retained a lawyer。
Wang fong told journalists that after the incident, the public security department had claimed that the dog bites were a civil dispute, that the owner of the dog had not driven the dog to deliberately injure him and to go to the city administration, which had initially claimed that the large dog was not responsible for the city and would not testify, but had later produced the dog certificate。
Over a period of two months, ms. Geng's family and henan tv-related journalists ran repeatedly between different departments. Wang fong said, “how difficult it is to say this time that some of the departments in anyang city are not doing anything, pushing us around and pushing us around.”
It is understood that ms. Guang's family was advised by the city department of anyang to take legal proceedings to court. According to li ji-hoon, a lawyer at the court office in kanda (chengzhou) in beijing, the state is currently implementing a mechanism for the settlement of disputes. A minor matter brought before the courts would be a waste of judicial resources, and local authorities should effectively assume responsibility for resolving conflicts。
Five questions:Social governanceCan you be more proactive
The incident attracted widespread online attention, as did xinhua journalists during their field interviews, who were not only pushed, but also denied interviews, some of whom said that they were waiting, and others that they were fighting “taiwan” with journalists and playing “deception”。
In the midst of this passion, the party group of the anyang city market supervisory authority has decided to suspend wang xin from office on 19 november and to cooperate with the organizational verification. On the evening of 19 november, wang xin just arrived at ms. Guang's home to apologize and to say that he would no longer have dogs in the district。
