I. Concluding issues
Briefly describe the editorial principles governing relations with authors。
In dealing with the relationship with the author, the editor of [the answer] follows two basic principles:
(1) respect for the work of authors
Editorial respect for authors facilitates the establishment of an equal collaboration between editors and authors. The editorial respect for authors is reflected in both the composition and the revision of the work。
In grouping activities, authors understand the purpose and motivation of the editor in identifying a particular reporting line. The editor should also seek the author's views and views on the editorial guidelines and, to the extent possible, accept the author's reasonable suggestions. When editing a draft, attention is drawn to:
(a) repeated work on its own draft plan to base it on basic science and practicality。
B. When formulating their views, the language shall be clear, specific, sincere, frank, cordial, consultative, consultative or religious。
(c) adequate and correct understanding of the author and the ability to take his or her views and opinions into account in his or her place and to react in a flexible manner with understanding or with further clarity, or with the necessary additions, or with appropriate amendments to the planned coverage。
In revising the text, the editor shall respect the author, his labour and the author's copyright。
(2) understanding the author's mind
Different authors have different characteristics and even the same author has different backgrounds in different contexts, and editors should be aware of the author's mentality and circumstances when dealing with the author. Psychologically familiar with the author's mind, which is often one of the recipes for editorial and author friendly relations. In revising the text, the editor also studies the author's mentality and does appropriate work. In general, authors are likely to have three broad categories:
The authors are modest in their respect for the work of editors and their own open-mindedness and personal gain and loss. Such authors fall into two categories:
A. Talented, self-confident, but also styled authors, whose work is of good quality and who accept editorial modifications。
(b) authors with a certain talent, but with insufficient self-confidence and even a certain weakness, prefer to be guided by editors, who, in their minds, are teachers, whether positive or negative。
2 authors have a high self-esteem and are too confident that they are the first in the world to be edited. Such authors fall into two categories:
Page 1, totalling 5 pages
