Foreword
The official statistics are clear: the year 2026 will see the peak in the size of junior high school students, whose numbers will reach historical peaks. In other words, the average number of junior high school students will only fall gradually from that year onwards, making it difficult to return to a “peak” of the same size。
This information alone is worth considering — why is the recent “cancellation of the examination” repeated in the circle of friends? Why is the tension and anxiety in the family spreading
When students reach their peak, access to education, the supply of degrees and diversions are expected to be amplified, making emotions and rumours more likely to ignite。
Education resourcesCrisis, school "overload"
In the current situation, the educational environment had reached a “overload” state in 2026, school capacity had reached its limit and classrooms in many places had become “crowding grounds”。
In some cities, popular schools are more overcrowded, competition for entry is high, and students are studying “dock-down” in classrooms where there is little room for breathing, which has a huge impact on the burden on students and their mental health。
In the face of such a large group of students, teachers are not only unable to provide effective individualized counselling, but even minimal classroom interaction becomes extremely difficult. The stress and physical and mental burdens on teachers are increasing, and the quality of students'studies is declining。
The problem is much more than space, and the distribution of educational resources has become increasingly uneven following the influx of large numbers of students into schools, and the educational gap between urban and rural areas has widened further。
While leading schools in large cities are still able to attract a large number of high-quality sources, in some small cities and even in rural areas the level of education in schools has fallen sharply。
In addition to inadequate hardware facilities, the quantity and quality of teachers are not guaranteed in many remote schools, and in many places teachers are forced to maintain their teaching in “crowded” conditions, a situation that is worsening, with severe imbalances in educational resources, which places students in these areas in even more difficult educational conditions。
In response to the surge in student numbers, some local governments have embarked on a “wall-breaking” reform that seeks to “release” school teaching pressure through various means。
However, such so-called “short-term solutions” can only relieve immediate pressures and, in the long run, cannot address them fundamentally. The core of education — the interaction of teachers and students, the quality of the classroom — has long been reduced to the limit。
More importantly, this disguised “overload” has not only put a great deal of pressure on students but has also made teachers less effective in teaching, and the decline in the quality of education has become a reality that cannot be ignored。
Educational policy reform to try to save the education system before the collapse
In the face of such severe educational pressures, national and local governments have embarked on a series of policy adjustments, with no greater concern than whether the mid- and senior-level examinations will be abolished。
Although there have been numerous official rumours that the “middle and higher examination” will not be removed easily, the voices of society are still silent, and many parents and students look to this crucial issue of future destiny。
Because, in their view, the mid-level and higher examination is no longer a purely selection tool, but rather an overriding “promotion pathway”, which, once blocked, will greatly affect the mobility of the entire society and the educational dreams of many families。
On a practical level, the ministry of education has begun to gradually reduce the weight of examinations in some disciplines, trying to reduce pressure by adjusting the fractional system。
For example, the weight of science disciplines, such as physics and chemistry, has been reduced in some areas, while the weight of basic disciplines, such as language and mathematics, has gradually increased。
The underlying reasons behind this adjustment are, to a large extent, to make the examination system more responsive to current educational needs and to reduce the burden on students and teachers, but the effect of this adjustment is a more complex and blurred score systemEquity in educationThe problem of sexuality is even more pronounced。
For some small and medium-sized cities, although they have reduced pressure by reducing the content of examinations and adjusting the scoring criteria, this change has also made education resources more “preferenceful”。
Schools in large cities are still able to attract more high-quality sources of life, and in some areas where educational resources are scarce they are still coping with short-term education。
Even where national and local governments have embarked on a series of reforms, such reforms have been difficult to fill the huge gap created by the imbalance in education, and the issue of equity in education has yet to be fundamentally addressed。
Parents are anxious. Poor information increases educational anxiety
In 2026, with the dramatic increase in the number of primary and secondary school students, the anxiety of the parent group reached its peak, and discussions and rumours about the cancellation of the mid- and high-level examinations were once the subject of much debate on social platforms such as twitter and qqq。
Many parents, in the context of asymmetrical information, have begun to generate strong mistrust of the education system, fearing that educational opportunities that might otherwise rely on hard work will be dashed by one-size-fits-all reforms。
In order to cope with this “anxieties”, many parents have opted for a more radical approach to securing more opportunities for their children, such as high supplementary costs, choice of private schools, etc., creating a vicious circle。
This poor information and anxiety have led some to overstretched concerns about the adjustment of the future education system, and some parents have begun to believe that the “elimination of the secondary and higher education examination” is only a matter of time and may even choose to prepare in advance for this extreme change。
As the government claims, the educational system will not easily make such drastic changes, especially with regard to the elimination of the mid- and high-level examinations, and its social impact will be far greater than expected。
Even so, parents ' and students ' anxiety persists, and the vicious cycle of anxiety and poor information makes it more difficult to move some educational decisions forward, and parents ' panic actually complicates the adjustment of educational policies and makes reform of the education system difficult。
Concluding remarks
Each policy adjustment, every change in the education system, is designed to keep the system from collapse, and the government and the education sector are doing their best to address this “education flood” through reforms and adjustments, but existing resource constraints and policy bottlenecks remain challenges that cannot be ignored。
For parents and students at large, the future course of education is fraught with uncertainty and, as the selection mechanisms for mid-level and higher examinations are adjusted and educational resources continue to strain, the competition for educational equity, quality of education and access to education has become a game for many families。
In this battle without smoke, how the education system will emerge from a path that will both ease stress and guarantee equity remains an unresolved challenge。
Source
