Journalist survey: who is buying and who is selling
Who's selling itShort videoAccount number? Journalists viewed the “fish claw net” and found that there were two main sellers. One short video, with a certain amount of fans, is from the media, which sells accounts for “no time to clean”, “no account number to earn”, “no content production efficiency”, etc. The other is a professional adoption. They often produce a series of numbers from scratch, which is repeated when the number of fans, the number of hits and the number of playouts reach a certain level. Selling accounts is a mature oneIndustrial chainI don't know. And on this chain of industries, there is already a mass-breeding team。
As buyers, journalists were exposed to one of the head of the “fish-claw net” studios, who lived under the catch sign. The officer-in-charge indicated that three or four of them were dedicated to operating various accounts, covering food, education, childcare, music, etc. “when we register, we change the data to a normal user, see the preferred video, click on someone else's home page and look at his other video.” the officer-in-charge introduced the idea of imitating a normal user to the extent possible. The latter part of the term, which is familiar with the rectification and recommendatory rules of each platform, allows attention to be given to the number in a very short period of time. It is then sold on the platform and in groups, and then, in the same way, a group of accounts. The chief researcher of the cybersecurity and crime research base of the security management department of telecommunications stated that “such sellers do not operate accounts for content purposes, usually by raising accounts in the form of handling, simple graphics, etc., for sale”
So, does anyone really buy short video accounts? Journalists see on the “fishclawnet” that there is a “trading dynamic” section on the web page, in which there is ongoing trading information rolling. According to the head of the above-mentioned maintenance studio, there are two main types of persons who purchase short video accounts, one for the purpose of attracting traffic and the other for the purpose of engaging in the black industrial chain of short video, and who buy the accounts in the past in order to carry out various illegal or grey acts of covert identity. “fake to sell is one of the motivations for them to buy accounts.” according to previous media reports, some video producers openly displayed the process of “homemade” lipstick and powder, which was then branded, transferring shipments by leaving micro-messages, creating a black industrial chain. As a result, there was an alarming presence of amani, diau, 35 dollars in lipstick, lv double shoulder bag, 430 dollars, second-hand apple x phone, 3,500 dollars..
The law regulates violations of the adoption number
The consequences of the short video account were manifold. In addition to the above, the use of short video platforms to forge and sell off to become “false window” beyond that, what is really hurt is the fact that short video, which has an innovative content-capacity capacity, is from the media, and is certainly not as good as a studio in terms of portability, operational capability, liquidity, etc. When a short video account becomes a commodity, it means that content creation is reduced to a simple duplicate output of streaming lines. In this way, the short video platform is bound to have a “bad currency to expel the good currency”。
“it is true that there is no law that outlaws the sale of short video accounts, but only violates the relevant provisions of the platform and, if found, may be merely sealed. However, various irregularities against short video account providers and low-seat buyers can be regulated by law.” menmiko indicates that, on the path of the law, acts such as malicious registration of a seller or even theft of a number may be guilty of violating citizens' personal information, or of providing tools for intrusions into, illegal control of computer information systems, or sabotage of computer information systems. “in cases of `knowledge' of crime committed by downstream buyers, there may also be a violation of article 297, paragraph 2, of the criminal code, regarding activities to facilitate information cybercrime.”
