On 4 october, the cool self-made comedy comedy comedy comedy came back in the second season. Surprisingly, the host of the first season of "funny headline" peopleJia niangIt was his good brother chen heh who was replaced before the broadcast。
While chen hek and the video red man zhang's premiere also received a lot of “media appreciation”, the excitement triggered by the sudden change of the first season's middle-middle-moderate jani light is rapidly fermenting, ranging from whether chen jia's “brawling” would lead to rumours of brother-in-law, to speculation about the high cost of the show, to questions about the headline's return to the talk show, and the confusion that the entertainment environment is “sprung up everywhere” and “spring with fruit and fruit”。
Will it last long after 90
Thanks to the cool platform, " funny headlines " were once viewed for its big data advantage, and the data-rich combination of popular searches and popular videos were well known for its post-90 user taste. The first season was broadcast with a win-win performance of 200 million copies and a good reputation。
According to the production team, the first season of programming, whether the first talk show was sponsored by jia niang, or the performance of guests such as zhang, han and marco, was an accurate invitation to analyse the big data of the target user. It is easy to imagine that this round is either a new one or a new one for business purposes, an organic combination of chen's brand-new style of hosting, programming set-up, etc., or a more up-to-date audience style designed to recreate the cross-border interpretation of the programme。
As a topic comedy conglomerate, the moderator's talk show and the funny short film have been important two parts of the fancy headline, and the moderator's task is to be responsible for the whole series, which can be said to be the success or failure of his or her choice. Chen heh, who is also an actor, has defeated the “paternal effect” of janai in a ghost-style style, which should be seen as a breakthrough in the modern curry of the curry with the cool potatoes。
Chen's cross-border hosting of the premiere, which has grown up as an all-embracing curator of the country like runners, does not appear to be rigid, and a combination of “herbocks” with zhang's full-blown eggs makes the internet friends who are used to the host's self-speakers buy. Its eclectic style, which is fun and cheap, gives a new sense not only of the first week's impact, but also of the fact that the first week's coverage of the topic has reached 180 million, and of the second quality on the microblogging list, prompts speculation about the next 11 issues。
The author's expectations for this programme can also be seen in a set of commercial tweets: “since the social topics of interest to young audiences, 12 different comedy themes have been created. The scene host's talk show and exterior comedy scenes alternately, balancing the percentage of content of comedy and outdoor comedy in the shed, increasing the narrative rhythm of the programme, allowing the studio and outdoors to form two powerful comedy magnetic fields, and successfully attract members of the internet to watch on a continuous basis...”
At first glance, this seems to be the case, and it is true that topics that are very close to young audiences are more likely to resonate with young people, but whether “new and old” young people can buy on a long-term basis is a common dilemma for all-art producers. Looking closely at the commentary of "the big head" is a bit harsh in terms of the half-spectrum, but the complimentary words are generally directed at the host or the way he behaves: "it's too good to find the host, the most funny people on the web!", "it must be wrong to open it, i can see chen red and the thick cp feeling!", and so on, which is a source of concern。
When it's still the same one
And at the other extreme of the commentary, it's full of screens, "why don't i find it funny!" and "the story is too old!"。
The first season of " funny headlines " , which resulted in the selection of 56 people from more than 700 sections, was one of the main factors that it reaped for a wide range of users. Of the users, 53 per cent are men and 47 per cent are women, 40 per cent are 17-24 years old, 25 per cent are 25-40 years old, and the majority are young viewers, with a significant proportion of university students。
On the basis of this, the re-emergence of "funty headlines" continues in its previous style, featuring a "real comedy is a time of trouble and can be thought-provoking" with 12 different themes, namely, 12 slots for young people, with the greatest enthusiasm to engage young people. In terms of expression, on the basis of outdoor comedy clips and studio talk shows, studio smalls, sound, fun tests, chorus, poetry reading, dance, interviews with virtual characters, etc., were added to the show from 10 to 30 minutes。
In the official commentary, this type of support shows the sincerity of the team's efforts to make fun of it, such as the first talk show, "what is the logic of the parents, what is not " , " what is not " , " , " what is not " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , " , "。
But is that really funny
Would it really resonate with everyone's smile, instead of having to look at the talk show and dance in 30 minutes? The new bottle is filled with old wine, which may attract a drink, or the one that opened up yesterday, which is now a chilling temperature, which is hard to reach。
A good comedy show sometimes doesn't take too many fancy forms, like little in-laws. If it's fun, it's not gonna change in half an hour. Over-consumption of the ensemble makes the lack of comedy elements a constant concern for the industry, and a real classic coming out takes a long time to settle, but it is hard to think about new things when viewers see more of what they do on stage。
It's worth over a billion
In the past two years, one of the effects of the all-articular blow-outs — the homogenization of content。
In the general context, after the 2012 “recreational restraining order”, david saw a sharp decline in homogeneity; it was not until 2013 that " where's dad going " , which led to a new round of seasonal contests for ensembles, which resulted in a large pattern of more than 200 ensembles a year. With a lot of ensembles, the guests have become fragrances, and the season's news continues to spread, culminating in the issuance last year of a circular on strengthening the management of reality shows by the national general directorate of radio and television, which limits the starization of reality shows。
To go to the stars, to be precise, to go to the first-line stars, the road stars of yoon peng, jalling, and zhang wei xue-hye-hye's properties, which both ensure a laugh on the ensemble and save more space for the group at relatively low cost, have become “suspense” for the big ensembles; and the artists who are popular with their own “web sense” have become the network, and are accepted by more people through realistic shows, interviews, and become the conglomerates。
In february and july of this year alone, we received more than 20 consecutive invitations to join the show, making a leap to becoming a small artist. As the media quoted in the interview, “when there were projects for big zhang wei and xue xin before spring, their offer was still around 300,000/periods, but now it is almost 700,000 and 800,000. In this way, artists participate in 20 or 30 programmes each year and the target of over billions of dollars annually is significant。
Readers learned that, like the chorus comedy, song xiaobao, huo yun peng, etc., the price of going on the show has reached around 1 million times, and that even if shena and jia niang were to perform the "packing price", the price would follow a single star — and is there a cost factor in removing the content from the title of the funny
Maybe there's a reason? After all, the high-paying ensembles, which are generally worth four times more than the 30 million in the first-class movie, are more expensive than the 8-12 million in the first-class film; the time frame for the ensemble is lighter and flexible compared to the monthly cycles of the film, with a considerable amount of time to take on the rest of the job; and the ensemble is much easier compared to the requirements of the film series
The awkwardness of high pay, the variation of the art market, and even the evils of the star circle of “stars focusing on art and filming as sidelines”, may ultimately be constrained by the policies of the agencies concerned。
