Do you want a test on the head antibiotic or not? It's always been a problem for many doctors, nurses, pharmacists and patients' friends! Antibiotics are a well-known drug for treating pathogen infections, such as bacteria, and probably penicillin and headgillin. Many people do a leather test before it is used, and some friends have allergies in the course of their drug use, even if they have had a head test. So there's a lot of controversy in the medical world as to whether or not to do a pictorial test of the gill. Recently, the national commission for health and health has issued a clear message that antibacterial drugs with a head spas are not subject to a leather test, except in two exceptional cases,
There is no need for a dermatological test for head spasm antibiotics, but the following two special cases are required: pie test
Penicillin has a well-defined antigen structure and has a high incidence of allergies, so it requires a decorative test, as opposed to a hemorrhage, whose allergy mechanisms are not clear, and there is currently no listed sepsis test agent. Most importantly, evidence from clinical evidence indicates limited sensitivity, specificity and prognosis. So most of the gills don't recommend a leather test. Unless:
(1) patients who have previously had β-neamide type i (fast hair) allergies
In the case of patients who use headgills, it is more important to ask for allergies than to do a piping test, which should be given priority if there has been a previous explicit allergy caused by penicillin or piping. There is also a need to ensure that emergency conditions are in place to avoid a sensitive shock and that timely and effective treatment is available。
(2) medicines for which a medical examination is required
Because of the different types of precipitosis in different producers, the risk of allergy varies depending on the production process and structure. The listed drugs are clinically tested, so those drugs that require a physical examination are indicated in the instructions. It is important to note that the requirement for a pictorial test is not constant in the capaceous drug description, for example in the case of a pictoria pine injection fluid, which was added to the piline test requirement in 2013 but was again revised in july 2015 to remove the piline test requirement。
The change in the leather test requirements for twilight is mainly due to the increased awareness of twilight and the related clinical trials, which revealed a low compliance rate of twilight, i. E., lower predictions of twilight tests, which in cases where indications are not sufficient, will result in medical staff being less vigilant and less responsive. In the absence of a dermatological examination, however, health-care workers closely monitor patients ' allergies and can respond positively and effectively when they occur。
It also reminds us of the need for careful monitoring of the use of headspray drugs, which, even without a skin test, is not in any way the possibility of allergies occurring, and that careful guardianship is always right
Concluding remarks
In most cases, headgills are not subject to a dermatology test, with the exception that at present all antibiotics are prescription drugs, are not self-admissible to patients ' friends and need to be used on the basis of an assessment by a specialist physician, bearing in mind the inaccuracies of the skin during their use and the need to contact doctors in a timely manner to prevent possible adverse reactions。
